| Home | Forums | Reviews | Articles | Register |
 |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
| |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
| |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi Rod
I haven't been able to find much on this. Similar issues usually end up resolved by re-running the forestprep operation. My understanding is that checks are made before carrying out an operation so that you don't end up with dups. Bottom line is take a backup before you try again  There's one or two loose references to using the workaround section in: 329194 IPSec Policy Permissions in Windows 2000 and Windows Server 2003 http://support.microsoft.com/?id=329194 I'm not sure how this is relevant given the object you're having problems with however. Sorry I'm not more help. Just doesn't seem like a common problem. Kind regards -- Mark Renoden [MSFT] Windows Platform Support Team Email: (E-Mail Removed) Please note you'll need to strip ".online" from my email address to email me; I'll post a response back to the group. This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. "lazyadmin" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:(E-Mail Removed)... > It was run on the Schema Master. I have two DC's and this one holds all > the FSMO roles. I ran the adprep on this DC. > > Something I just noticed when I went to ensure I was on the Schema Master. > I loaded up the AD Schema MMC and tried to view the Operations Master and > it said it was offline? I reloaded the schema and I can look at the > Schema again and the Operations Master is showing online again. I also > verified that I did run adprep on the correct DC. Now I am not 100% the > Schema was online before, but I can't imagine how it went offline. > > I did check with DCDIAG and REPADMIN the day before and everything passed. > > Would it hurt to run adprep /forestprep again now that I am sure that the > Schema Master is online? Or is there a way to verify that the changes > were applied to the schema? I wouldn't want to run it again and end up > with a few hundred DUP records :P > > Thanks! > > Rod > http://dortoh.ca > > > > "Mark Renoden [MSFT]" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message > news:(E-Mail Removed)... >> Hi >> >> It seems to be saying it couldn't contact the Schema Master during the >> forestprep. What's the setup for your domain? Where is the Schema >> Master in relation to the DC you ran this on? >> >> Kind regards >> -- >> Mark Renoden [MSFT] >> Windows Platform Support Team >> Email: (E-Mail Removed) >> >> Please note you'll need to strip ".online" from my email address to email >> me; I'll post a response back to the group. >> >> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no >> rights. >> >> "lazyadmin" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message >> news:%(E-Mail Removed)... >>>I am running adprep /forestprep against my native Windows 2000 domain. I >>>was logged on as Enterprise, Domain, Schema admin and I was performing >>>the upgrade on the Schema Master FSMO role holder. >>> >>> At the end I got the following message: >>> >>> http://dortoh.ca/crap/error.txt >>> >>> Ldap Error 0x33 is LDAP_BUSY??? So I did some digging in the other logs >>> and it looks like everything completed successfully. >>> >>> schupgr.log http://dortoh.ca/crap/schupgr.txt >>> >>> ldif.log, and ldif.log.0 through ldif.log.16 all end with: >>> >>> ## entries modified successfully. >>> >>> The command has completed successfully >>> >>> The entire ADPrep.log is here: >>> >>> http://dortoh.ca/crap/adprep.txt >>> >>> Any ideas? It looks like everything completed successfully, besides the >>> error at the end. I looked it up and LDAP Error 0x33 means LDAP_Busy. >>> I guess it is possible LDAP was busy at the time but how would I know if >>> everything did indeed complete successfully? >>> >>> Is there a command I can run to verify my schema is ready for >>> /domainprep? >>> >>> Rod >>> http://dortoh.ca >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Well I ran it a 2nd time, not much happened, looked like it was just
verifying everything. But! Adprep successfully updated the forest-wide information. So I guess that is a good thing. Wish list? Adprep /verify  Thanks! Rod "Mark Renoden [MSFT]" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:(E-Mail Removed)... > Hi Rod > > I haven't been able to find much on this. Similar issues usually end up > resolved by re-running the forestprep operation. My understanding is that > checks are made before carrying out an operation so that you don't end up > with dups. Bottom line is take a backup before you try again > > There's one or two loose references to using the workaround section in: > > 329194 IPSec Policy Permissions in Windows 2000 and Windows Server 2003 > http://support.microsoft.com/?id=329194 > > I'm not sure how this is relevant given the object you're having problems > with however. > > Sorry I'm not more help. Just doesn't seem like a common problem. > > Kind regards > -- > Mark Renoden [MSFT] > Windows Platform Support Team > Email: (E-Mail Removed) > > Please note you'll need to strip ".online" from my email address to email > me; I'll post a response back to the group. > > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no > rights. > > "lazyadmin" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message > news:(E-Mail Removed)... >> It was run on the Schema Master. I have two DC's and this one holds all >> the FSMO roles. I ran the adprep on this DC. >> >> Something I just noticed when I went to ensure I was on the Schema >> Master. I loaded up the AD Schema MMC and tried to view the Operations >> Master and it said it was offline? I reloaded the schema and I can look >> at the Schema again and the Operations Master is showing online again. I >> also verified that I did run adprep on the correct DC. Now I am not 100% >> the Schema was online before, but I can't imagine how it went offline. >> >> I did check with DCDIAG and REPADMIN the day before and everything >> passed. >> >> Would it hurt to run adprep /forestprep again now that I am sure that the >> Schema Master is online? Or is there a way to verify that the changes >> were applied to the schema? I wouldn't want to run it again and end up >> with a few hundred DUP records :P >> >> Thanks! >> >> Rod >> http://dortoh.ca >> >> >> >> "Mark Renoden [MSFT]" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message >> news:(E-Mail Removed)... >>> Hi >>> >>> It seems to be saying it couldn't contact the Schema Master during the >>> forestprep. What's the setup for your domain? Where is the Schema >>> Master in relation to the DC you ran this on? >>> >>> Kind regards >>> -- >>> Mark Renoden [MSFT] >>> Windows Platform Support Team >>> Email: (E-Mail Removed) >>> >>> Please note you'll need to strip ".online" from my email address to >>> email me; I'll post a response back to the group. >>> >>> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no >>> rights. >>> >>> "lazyadmin" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message >>> news:%(E-Mail Removed)... >>>>I am running adprep /forestprep against my native Windows 2000 domain. >>>>I was logged on as Enterprise, Domain, Schema admin and I was performing >>>>the upgrade on the Schema Master FSMO role holder. >>>> >>>> At the end I got the following message: >>>> >>>> http://dortoh.ca/crap/error.txt >>>> >>>> Ldap Error 0x33 is LDAP_BUSY??? So I did some digging in the other >>>> logs and it looks like everything completed successfully. >>>> >>>> schupgr.log http://dortoh.ca/crap/schupgr.txt >>>> >>>> ldif.log, and ldif.log.0 through ldif.log.16 all end with: >>>> >>>> ## entries modified successfully. >>>> >>>> The command has completed successfully >>>> >>>> The entire ADPrep.log is here: >>>> >>>> http://dortoh.ca/crap/adprep.txt >>>> >>>> Any ideas? It looks like everything completed successfully, besides >>>> the error at the end. I looked it up and LDAP Error 0x33 means >>>> LDAP_Busy. I guess it is possible LDAP was busy at the time but how >>>> would I know if everything did indeed complete successfully? >>>> >>>> Is there a command I can run to verify my schema is ready for >>>> /domainprep? >>>> >>>> Rod >>>> http://dortoh.ca >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > > |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Good to hear it worked out!
-- Mark Renoden [MSFT] Windows Platform Support Team Email: (E-Mail Removed) Please note you'll need to strip ".online" from my email address to email me; I'll post a response back to the group. This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. "lazyadmin" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:(E-Mail Removed)... > Well I ran it a 2nd time, not much happened, looked like it was just > verifying everything. > > But! > > Adprep successfully updated the forest-wide information. > > So I guess that is a good thing. Wish list? Adprep /verify > > Thanks! > > Rod > "Mark Renoden [MSFT]" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message > news:(E-Mail Removed)... >> Hi Rod >> >> I haven't been able to find much on this. Similar issues usually end up >> resolved by re-running the forestprep operation. My understanding is >> that checks are made before carrying out an operation so that you don't >> end up with dups. Bottom line is take a backup before you try again >> >> There's one or two loose references to using the workaround section in: >> >> 329194 IPSec Policy Permissions in Windows 2000 and Windows Server 2003 >> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=329194 >> >> I'm not sure how this is relevant given the object you're having problems >> with however. >> >> Sorry I'm not more help. Just doesn't seem like a common problem. >> >> Kind regards >> -- >> Mark Renoden [MSFT] >> Windows Platform Support Team >> Email: (E-Mail Removed) >> >> Please note you'll need to strip ".online" from my email address to email >> me; I'll post a response back to the group. >> >> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no >> rights. >> >> "lazyadmin" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message >> news:(E-Mail Removed)... >>> It was run on the Schema Master. I have two DC's and this one holds all >>> the FSMO roles. I ran the adprep on this DC. >>> >>> Something I just noticed when I went to ensure I was on the Schema >>> Master. I loaded up the AD Schema MMC and tried to view the Operations >>> Master and it said it was offline? I reloaded the schema and I can look >>> at the Schema again and the Operations Master is showing online again. >>> I also verified that I did run adprep on the correct DC. Now I am not >>> 100% the Schema was online before, but I can't imagine how it went >>> offline. >>> >>> I did check with DCDIAG and REPADMIN the day before and everything >>> passed. >>> >>> Would it hurt to run adprep /forestprep again now that I am sure that >>> the Schema Master is online? Or is there a way to verify that the >>> changes were applied to the schema? I wouldn't want to run it again and >>> end up with a few hundred DUP records :P >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> Rod >>> http://dortoh.ca >>> >>> >>> >>> "Mark Renoden [MSFT]" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message >>> news:(E-Mail Removed)... >>>> Hi >>>> >>>> It seems to be saying it couldn't contact the Schema Master during the >>>> forestprep. What's the setup for your domain? Where is the Schema >>>> Master in relation to the DC you ran this on? >>>> >>>> Kind regards >>>> -- >>>> Mark Renoden [MSFT] >>>> Windows Platform Support Team >>>> Email: (E-Mail Removed) >>>> >>>> Please note you'll need to strip ".online" from my email address to >>>> email me; I'll post a response back to the group. >>>> >>>> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no >>>> rights. >>>> >>>> "lazyadmin" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message >>>> news:%(E-Mail Removed)... >>>>>I am running adprep /forestprep against my native Windows 2000 domain. >>>>>I was logged on as Enterprise, Domain, Schema admin and I was >>>>>performing the upgrade on the Schema Master FSMO role holder. >>>>> >>>>> At the end I got the following message: >>>>> >>>>> http://dortoh.ca/crap/error.txt >>>>> >>>>> Ldap Error 0x33 is LDAP_BUSY??? So I did some digging in the other >>>>> logs and it looks like everything completed successfully. >>>>> >>>>> schupgr.log http://dortoh.ca/crap/schupgr.txt >>>>> >>>>> ldif.log, and ldif.log.0 through ldif.log.16 all end with: >>>>> >>>>> ## entries modified successfully. >>>>> >>>>> The command has completed successfully >>>>> >>>>> The entire ADPrep.log is here: >>>>> >>>>> http://dortoh.ca/crap/adprep.txt >>>>> >>>>> Any ideas? It looks like everything completed successfully, besides >>>>> the error at the end. I looked it up and LDAP Error 0x33 means >>>>> LDAP_Busy. I guess it is possible LDAP was busy at the time but how >>>>> would I know if everything did indeed complete successfully? >>>>> >>>>> Is there a command I can run to verify my schema is ready for >>>>> /domainprep? >>>>> >>>>> Rod >>>>> http://dortoh.ca >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > > |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
| |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Q Adprep/forestprep and Adprep/domainprep | Jason8888 | Microsoft Windows 2000 Active Directory | 3 | 5th Jan 2004 07:28 AM |
| adprep /domainprep fails when upgrade to 2003 | Thomas Nilsson | Microsoft Windows 2000 Active Directory | 4 | 19th Sep 2003 02:35 AM |
| ADPREP /forestprep fails on sch18.ldf (Line 333) | Stephen Tukavkin | Microsoft Windows 2000 Active Directory | 6 | 8th Sep 2003 04:30 AM |
| Re: schema change using ADPREP | Matjaz Ladava [MVP] | Microsoft Windows 2000 Active Directory | 5 | 5th Aug 2003 09:59 PM |
| Adprep /Forestprep | nielsen | Microsoft Windows 2000 Active Directory | 1 | 8th Jul 2003 02:53 PM |
