Hi Scot,
please download the olfaxprefixer.exe from this side. Its Freeware and maybe
it could solve your problem
http://home.arcor.de/andreas.roeder-...OL_Prog.htm#12
--
Ich habe nichts gemacht, gestern gings noch
"Scot" <(E-Mail Removed)> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:7pHed.6101$(E-Mail Removed)...
> Using OL 2002
> When trying to address email by clicking "To," how do I see which of the
> entries for the person is the correct address I want to use? Many people
> have a personal address and a business address, and one or two fax numbers
> as well.
>
> When trying to address outgoing email I do this:
> 1. click "To".
> 2. The OL Addressbook opens
> 3. I enter the person's name
> 4. I see two to six enteries for the person
> 5. I have no idea which entries are email or fax -- WHY?
>
> In OL 98 each entry displayed "E-mail 1," or "E-mail 2," or "Fax 1" etc.
In
> 2002 there is no such designation unless we scroll each entry far enough
to
> the right to discover if it's an E-mail address or a Fax number. Why
would
> the Microsoft programmers make it so bloody difficult to see the
addresses?
> Yes, I tried shifting the width of the address book columns but they
return
> to their default position on the next launch of OL.
>
> If anyone at Microsoft is listening, this makes sense:
>
> 1. Make the address book window large enough that we can see the relevant
> info, or at least make the window flexible so we can make it larger.
>
> 2. ...or...Add a column to the far left containing a symbol that tells us
> info, such as E1, E2, E3, F1, F2, F3. This option is the least desirable
> because we still won't be able to actually see the address to be sure
we're
> choosing the correct one.
>
> If there is a way to rectify the problem I'm having, and I've simply
> overlooked it, please tell me. I'm going nuts with this nonsensical
quirk.
> I'm boggled as to why anyone would make a change to a program that would
> render it more difficult and cumbersome to use.
>
>
>