Not all these dopes have even the first clue about Usenet, and have
less of a clue about the fact that changing the header title makes a new,
completely detached thread.
On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 16:01:05 -0600, "Fred Smith" <(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote:
>Thanks for the update. People could save themselves (and responders) a lot
>of time if they stuck to the same thread.
>
>Regards,
>Fred
>
>"Joe User" <joeu2004> wrote in message
>news:%23$9wjf$(E-Mail Removed)...
>> "Fred Smith" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>> You're making the problem a lot more difficult than it is.
>> [....]
>>> If you want to discard anything after the first decimal, use:
>>> =round(a1*24,1)
>>
>> You are at a disadvantage because JB has been splitting his question among
>> several postings. So you are not seeing the question in the proper
>> context, I presume.
>>
>> Although ROUND(A1*24,1) should round time the minute, ROUND((A1-A2)*24,1)
>> does not result in 0.2 as expected when A1 is 22:43 and A2 is 22:34, even
>> though their difference is displayed as 00:09 when formatted as hh:mm, and
>> (A1-A2)*24 is displayed as 0.15 when formatted as Number, unless we format
>> to 15 decimal places.
>>
>> As David explains in the thread that has all the context (klunk!), the
>> reason ROUND "fails" is because (A1-A2)*24 is infinitesimally less than
>> 0.15 for those particular values.
>>
>> Consequently, the problem of rounding hh:mm to fractional hours exactly
>> according to JB's table is indeed more difficult than simply using ROUND.
>>
>> And while David and others suggested tweaks to the subtraction formula to
>> make it work, the more general solution (e.g. if the result of the
>> subtraction is already a value in A3) might be:
>>
>> =ROUND(TEXT(A3,"hh:mm")*24,1)
>>
>> PS: In yet another thread (and context, sigh), David suggested using
>> MOD(A1-A2,1)*24 instead of simply (A1-A2)*24 in order to cover the case
>> where the time difference crosses midnight. JB neglects to explain that
>> in subsequent threads, leading to well-intentioned, but misleading
>> suggestions that the use of MOD is unnecessary.
>>
>>
>> ----- original message -----
>>
>> "Fred Smith" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> news:e6yyNJ$(E-Mail Removed)...
>>> You're making the problem a lot more difficult than it is. The conversion
>>> table you are using simply rounds the minutes to the nearest tenth of an
>>> hour.
>>>
>>> To convert an Excel time in a1 to a number, use:
>>> =a1*24
>>> Format the number with one decimal place. It will display what you want.
>>>
>>> If you want to discard anything after the first decimal, use:
>>> =round(a1*24,1)
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Fred
>>>
>>> "JB Bates" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>>> news:AC29CC8E-4EFC-4FDA-83E4-(E-Mail Removed)...
>>>>I am looking to do the same thing but we do not use the government time
>>>> calculation for our flight time.
>>>>
>>>> We use
>>>>
>>>> 0-2 = .0
>>>> 3-8 = .1
>>>> 9-14 = .2
>>>> 15-20 = .3
>>>> 21-26 = .4
>>>> 27-32 = .5
>>>> 33-38 = .6
>>>> 39-44 = .7
>>>> 45-50 = .8
>>>> 51-56 = .9
>>>> 57-59 = 1.0
>>>>
>>>> Any suggestions?
>>>>
>>>> "Teethless mama" wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> A2: T/O
>>>>> B2: LAND
>>>>>
>>>>> In C2: =ROUND(MOD(TEXT(B2,"00\:00")-TEXT(A2,"00\:00"),1)*24,1)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Hercdriver" wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > I need to add aircraft takeoff and land times in a 24 hour (military)
>>>>> > format
>>>>> > to come up with flight hours in a decimal format across days (the
>>>>> > date itself
>>>>> > is not important).
>>>>> > Example:
>>>>> > Takeoff 2231 to land 0138 the next morning is 3.1 hours of flight
>>>>> > time and
>>>>> > would look like this:
>>>>> > T/O LAND Hours
>>>>> > 2231 0138 3.1
>>>>> >
>>>>> > The tenths of hours are standard flight time accounting and go like
>>>>> > this:
>>>>> > 0-5 min= .0, 6-11 min= .1, 12-17 min= .2, 18- 23 min= .3, 24-29 min=
>>>>> > .4,
>>>>> > 30-35 min= .5, 36-41 min= .6, 42-47 min= .7, 48-53 min= .8, and 54-59
>>>>> > min= .9.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I'll be using Excel 2002 to do this, if it can be done at all.
>>>>> > Thanks in
>>>>> > advance.
>>>
>>