PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

AdAware, Spybot S&D and CPU cycles

 
 
Peter
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      14th Aug 2004
In addition to AVG, I run AdAware and Spybot on my Win2K machine: 1,33
Athlon with 512 megs of memory on a dial-ip connection. I notice that
running AdAware and Spybot takes takes up 99% of processor capacity,
with some variation. Why so processor intensive? Is this normal?

-PS
---
Change offline to online to mail




 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
madmax
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      15th Aug 2004
Peter wrote:

> In addition to AVG, I run AdAware and Spybot on my Win2K machine: 1,33
> Athlon with 512 megs of memory on a dial-ip connection. I notice that
> running AdAware and Spybot takes takes up 99% of processor capacity,
> with some variation. Why so processor intensive? Is this normal?
>
> -PS
> ---
> Change offline to online to mail



I use XP Pro but adaware and spybot taking 99% does not seem normal to
me.Perhaps you have some malware.Try scanning your system with an online
scanner.I have links to some on my site.
-max

--
To help you stay safe see: http://www.geocities.com/maxpro4u/madmax.html
This message is virus free as far as I can tell.
Change nomail.afraid.org to neo.rr.com so you can reply
(nomail.afraid.org has been set up specifically for
use in Usenet. Feel free to use it yourself.)
 
Reply With Quote
 
john smith
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      15th Aug 2004
dont know about spybot but ad-aware is processor intensive during a scan,
but while fiddling in its gui with settings and what not, 0-1% cpu

ad-aware running at 70-99% cpu a in depth file scan of windows, and
documents and settings, 40280 objects, took 2mins 42 here

ad-aware running at 10-30% cpu (had another process running 70-90% cpu to
throttle ad-aware), took 6mins 22, so, im happier with it taking as much cpu
as possible if it finishes the scan much quicker

with in-depth turned off same scan takes 7 seconds :-)


"Peter" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> In addition to AVG, I run AdAware and Spybot on my Win2K machine: 1,33
> Athlon with 512 megs of memory on a dial-ip connection. I notice that
> running AdAware and Spybot takes takes up 99% of processor capacity,
> with some variation. Why so processor intensive? Is this normal?
>
> -PS
> ---
> Change offline to online to mail
>
>
>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Peter
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      15th Aug 2004
madmax wrote:

> I use XP Pro but adaware and spybot taking 99% does not seem normal to
> me.Perhaps you have some malware.Try scanning your system with an
> online scanner.I have links to some on my site.
> -max


I've run a couple of online scanners and they told me my machine was
clean (Trend Micro, Bit Defender).
Ran TrojanScan but it crashed IE.
http://www.windowsecurity.com/trojanscan/. Anyone else experienced
this?
Found Ewido, downloaded it and it told me my machine was clean (except
for a bunch of tracking cookies).
http://www.windowsecurity.com/trojanscan/.

It appears that John Smith is correct..Ad-aware is very CPU intensive
during a scan (and Spybot even more so from my experience).

Thanks for the reply.

--PS
---
Change offline to online to mail





 
Reply With Quote
 
madmax
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      15th Aug 2004
Peter wrote:
> madmax wrote:
>
>
>>I use XP Pro but adaware and spybot taking 99% does not seem normal to
>>me.Perhaps you have some malware.Try scanning your system with an
>>online scanner.I have links to some on my site.
>>-max

>
>
> I've run a couple of online scanners and they told me my machine was
> clean (Trend Micro, Bit Defender).
> Ran TrojanScan but it crashed IE.
> http://www.windowsecurity.com/trojanscan/. Anyone else experienced
> this?
> Found Ewido, downloaded it and it told me my machine was clean (except
> for a bunch of tracking cookies).
> http://www.windowsecurity.com/trojanscan/.
>
> It appears that John Smith is correct..Ad-aware is very CPU intensive
> during a scan (and Spybot even more so from my experience).
>
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> --PS
> ---
> Change offline to online to mail


Sorry,I misunderstood your question.If you open the configuration
window,there is a setting under"scanning engine"that you can change to
"run scan as background process"
Also spybot has a setting under "scan priority" you can set to low.
-max

--
To help you stay safe see: http://www.geocities.com/maxpro4u/madmax.html
This message is virus free as far as I can tell.
Change nomail.afraid.org to neo.rr.com so you can reply
(nomail.afraid.org has been set up specifically for
use in Usenet. Feel free to use it yourself.)
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
use Adaware and/or SpyBot SD anonymous Spyware Application Compatibility 1 24th Jan 2005 06:46 PM
now! which is better? Spybot or AdAware? az0000000 Windows XP Security 3 26th Oct 2004 01:36 AM
Adaware and Spybot S&D Thomas Windows XP General 7 29th Jun 2004 01:37 PM
adaware/spybot - are they the same? ngalbrai Windows XP 6 28th May 2004 08:48 PM
AdAware/SpyBot Mike Microsoft Windows 2000 5 21st Apr 2004 09:25 AM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:20 PM.