Seconded. I'm using both (and don't disable one when the other is
scanning). No problems so far. Windows 2000.
On Sun, 5 Mar 2006 18:45:29 -0500, "Debby Hanoka"
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>Yes, I tested Ad-Aware SE with Windows Defender Beta. There were
>no slow downs.
>
>Debby
>
>"Bill Sanderson" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
>message
>news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>> Have you tested this combination with Windows Defender, the
>> beta2 version of Microsoft Antispyware?
>>
>> http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...displaylang=en
>>
>> --
>>
>> "Debby Hanoka" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>>>> How compatible is MS AntiSpyware Beta version and AdAware Pro
>>>> Se version?
>>>> Any issue that I might need to know about?
>>>
>>> I found that when MSAS is loaded in the system tray, and you
>>> try to scan with Ad-Aware (any version), Ad-Aware takes longer
>>> than usual to scan -- actually slows to a crawl.
>>>
>>>> I'm thinking of adding MS to the rouster of tools, and I'm
>>>> wondering if the
>>>> two programs will eat each other up, conflict with each
>>>> other, cancel out
>>>> aspects of each other,...etc etc etc?
>>>
>>> Best advice is to close out MSAS before scanning with
>>> Ad-Aware, and then go back into MSAS when you're done.
>>>
>>> Debby Hanoka
>>> dhanoka at earthlink dot net
>>>
>>
>>
>
--
All the best
David Millen
Xativa, Valencia
www.fincacasablanca.com
please reply in group
if you have to email me, remove the obvious:
(E-Mail Removed)