This is off topic, BUT - there are a finite range of choices for anti-virus.
McAfee has good detection record, but I am finding a continuing problem with
corrupted components. IN other word, it "breaks easily." Forget Symanatec.
I understand that Kapersky is excellent but that it is a beast, hard for some
machines to handle. Any info on that? What is your preference?
--
Old Rebel: Too Old to Rebel; Too Young to just take it!
"Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE" wrote:
> "Bill Sanderson" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:64465CBB-E41C-4573-AA0C-(E-Mail Removed)
> > Thanks - I haven't used McAfee except to see it briefly as a trial on
> > a new Dell in an office for a few months--since it was a dos app.
>
> I don't allow anything from McAfee or Symantec into the building.
>
> --
> Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE
> Please respond in Newsgroup. Do not send email
> http://www.fjsmjs.com
> Protect your PC
> http://www.microsoft.com/security/protect/
>
>
>
>