PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

Active Directory Integrity, Phantoms, Windows 2003 AD Upgrade

 
 
=?Utf-8?B?dHNhbGNpY2NpYQ==?=
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      22nd Nov 2006
I'm getting ready to upgrade my 2000 Active Directory to 2003. I have a
single domain (no child domains) with 3 Win2k DC's. I ran NTDsUtil » Files »
Integrity, which looked to my under-trained eye to exit without reporting any
problems.

I then ran the Semantic database analysis with "go fix". The summary
reported the following:

DC # 1
Active Objects 8834
Phantoms 8
Deleted 290

DC # 2
Active Objects 8835
Phantoms 6
Deleted 291

DC # 3
Active Objects 8837
Phantoms 10
Deleted 289

I understand the Phantoms to be deleted items past the Tombstone period
referred to by other objects.

Running analysis again without the "fix" and got the same results.

I don't know how to see what these Phantoms are, what other objects are
referring to them, or how to clean these up. I haven't found any relevant
articles. The closest tells you how to extract deleted AD objects using LDP
(258310), but doesn't tell you about identifying and/or resolving these
Phantoms.

Do these need to be cleaned up before upgrade to Win2k3 Active Directory?

Will these Phantoms persist forever, or is there a way to clean them up?

Any guidance would be appreciated.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Joe Richards [MVP]
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      22nd Nov 2006
Phantoms are not objects and so they aren't viewable from the standard
interfaces.

You can determine what the phantoms are by doing a database dump and
looking for the objects that have "false" listed in the OBJ column. Not
all items listed with false will be phantoms but you should be able to
pick them out. If something is referencing them you will also be able to
chase those references as well.

Phantoms are completely normal and quite honestly you are probably
digging into something you likely don't need to dig into but if you are
having fun, knock yourself out.

joe


--
Joe Richards Microsoft MVP Windows Server Directory Services
Author of O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition
www.joeware.net


---O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition now available---

http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm


tsalciccia wrote:
> I'm getting ready to upgrade my 2000 Active Directory to 2003. I have a
> single domain (no child domains) with 3 Win2k DC's. I ran NTDsUtil » Files »
> Integrity, which looked to my under-trained eye to exit without reporting any
> problems.
>
> I then ran the Semantic database analysis with "go fix". The summary
> reported the following:
>
> DC # 1
> Active Objects 8834
> Phantoms 8
> Deleted 290
>
> DC # 2
> Active Objects 8835
> Phantoms 6
> Deleted 291
>
> DC # 3
> Active Objects 8837
> Phantoms 10
> Deleted 289
>
> I understand the Phantoms to be deleted items past the Tombstone period
> referred to by other objects.
>
> Running analysis again without the "fix" and got the same results.
>
> I don't know how to see what these Phantoms are, what other objects are
> referring to them, or how to clean these up. I haven't found any relevant
> articles. The closest tells you how to extract deleted AD objects using LDP
> (258310), but doesn't tell you about identifying and/or resolving these
> Phantoms.
>
> Do these need to be cleaned up before upgrade to Win2k3 Active Directory?
>
> Will these Phantoms persist forever, or is there a way to clean them up?
>
> Any guidance would be appreciated.

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
=?Utf-8?B?dHNhbGNpY2NpYQ==?=
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      23rd Nov 2006
I'm not necessarily having fun, but I have learned a few new things.
Generally, I'm paranoid and fearful of having everything unravel into a heap
on the floor.

Many thanks for the advice. =t

"Joe Richards [MVP]" wrote:

> Phantoms are not objects and so they aren't viewable from the standard
> interfaces.
>
> You can determine what the phantoms are by doing a database dump and
> looking for the objects that have "false" listed in the OBJ column. Not
> all items listed with false will be phantoms but you should be able to
> pick them out. If something is referencing them you will also be able to
> chase those references as well.
>
> Phantoms are completely normal and quite honestly you are probably
> digging into something you likely don't need to dig into but if you are
> having fun, knock yourself out.
>
> joe
>
>
> --
> Joe Richards Microsoft MVP Windows Server Directory Services
> Author of O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition
> www.joeware.net
>
>
> ---O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition now available---
>
> http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm
>
>
> tsalciccia wrote:
> > I'm getting ready to upgrade my 2000 Active Directory to 2003. I have a
> > single domain (no child domains) with 3 Win2k DC's. I ran NTDsUtil » Files »
> > Integrity, which looked to my under-trained eye to exit without reporting any
> > problems.
> >
> > I then ran the Semantic database analysis with "go fix". The summary
> > reported the following:
> >
> > DC # 1
> > Active Objects 8834
> > Phantoms 8
> > Deleted 290
> >
> > DC # 2
> > Active Objects 8835
> > Phantoms 6
> > Deleted 291
> >
> > DC # 3
> > Active Objects 8837
> > Phantoms 10
> > Deleted 289
> >
> > I understand the Phantoms to be deleted items past the Tombstone period
> > referred to by other objects.
> >
> > Running analysis again without the "fix" and got the same results.
> >
> > I don't know how to see what these Phantoms are, what other objects are
> > referring to them, or how to clean these up. I haven't found any relevant
> > articles. The closest tells you how to extract deleted AD objects using LDP
> > (258310), but doesn't tell you about identifying and/or resolving these
> > Phantoms.
> >
> > Do these need to be cleaned up before upgrade to Win2k3 Active Directory?
> >
> > Will these Phantoms persist forever, or is there a way to clean them up?
> >
> > Any guidance would be appreciated.

>

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
question on upgrading from active directory 2000 to active directory 2003 Gary M Microsoft Windows 2000 Active Directory 2 16th Mar 2007 08:57 PM
Active Directory, Active Directory Federation Services and Microsoft Integration Identiy Server Mas Libman [MSFT] Microsoft Windows 2000 Active Directory 0 6th May 2005 10:55 PM
[Active Directory] On what ground does LDAP connect to Active Directory RTT Microsoft VB .NET 0 12th Apr 2005 04:20 PM
Arguments for 2003 Active directory versus 2000 active directory? =?Utf-8?B?c3RlcGhlbmJiYWtlcg==?= Microsoft Windows 2000 Active Directory 4 23rd Dec 2003 05:40 AM
compatibility between W2K Active Directory and W2k3 Active Directory Dani Microsoft Windows 2000 Active Directory 1 15th Sep 2003 11:03 AM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:37 AM.