I need ACDSEE32 software .... can someone help me pls.

"Flyboy73" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

> I need ACDSEE32 software .... can someone help me pls.

Did you perform a web search? I guess not.

Zepos

Once Upon A Time (on or around 25 Jul 2006 06:33:56 -0700), in
alt.comp.freeware, "Flyboy73" <(E-Mail Removed)>, by way of Message-iD
<(E-Mail Removed)>, wrote:

>I need ACDSEE32 software .... can someone help me pls.

Ah, but _Freeware_ (as legally-defined) ?

Rich_on 25-Jul-2006, Vrodok the Piglet lover <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

> Once Upon A Time (on or around 25 Jul 2006 06:33:56 -0700), in
> alt.comp.freeware, "Flyboy73" <(E-Mail Removed)>, by way of Message-iD
> <(E-Mail Removed)>, wrote:
>
> >I need ACDSEE32 software .... can someone help me pls.
>
> Ah, but _Freeware_ (as legally-defined) ?


For some reason there is some interest in acdsee at the moment
For some reason there is some interest in old versions of acdsee at the
moment
usual advice goto
http://www.oldversion.com

--
rich

Rich_on 25-Jul-2006, "rich" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

> For some reason there is some interest in acdsee at the moment
> For some reason there is some interest in old versions of acdsee at the
> moment
> usual advice goto
> http://www.oldversion.com

for some reason my b. multiclipboard is doubling everything up.

--
rich

Flyboy73 wrote:
> I need ACDSEE32 software .... can someone help me pls.

Rather than expecting to find that non-freeware here, why don't you try
either Irfanview:

http://irfanview.tuwien.ac.at/

(it will try to install some toolbar or whatever, but you just tell it
not to)

or the excellent XnView:

http://perso.orange.fr/pierre.g/xnview/enhome.html

--
Regards from John Corliss. I don't reply to trolls like Andy Mabbett.
No ad, cd, commercial, cripple, demo, nag, PROmotion, share, spy,
time-limited or trial wares or warez for me, please.

John Corliss wrote:

> Flyboy73 wrote:
>
>> I need ACDSEE32 software .... can someone help me pls.
>
>
> Rather than expecting to find that non-freeware here, why don't you
> try either Irfanview:
>
> http://irfanview.tuwien.ac.at/
>
> (it will try to install some toolbar or whatever, but you just tell
> it not to)
>
> or the excellent XnView:
>
> http://perso.orange.fr/pierre.g/xnview/enhome.html
>
John (et al);

Which do you prefer (and for what tasks)? Reason I ask is that I'm more
familiar w/the Gimp-Irfanview-Picassa2 cabal and haven't played much
w/XnView.

tia,
-Craig

"Craig" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:ukrxg.12092$(E-Mail Removed)...

> Which do you prefer (and for what tasks)? Reason I ask is that I'm more
> familiar w/the Gimp-Irfanview-Picassa2 cabal and haven't played much
> w/XnView.

XnView matches Irfanview almost feature for feature. (In fact, the author of
Irfanview takes a shot at his competitor on his website, implying that they
have been lifting their features from his program for several years.)

However, each has just enough strong individual features that I use them
both. Irfanview is better for the image batch process features but I like
XnView export features better. Both good programs. . .

HTH

M

Michael Laplante wrote:
> "Craig" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:ukrxg.12092$(E-Mail Removed)...
>
>
>>Which do you prefer (and for what tasks)? Reason I ask is that I'm more
>>familiar w/the Gimp-Irfanview-Picassa2 cabal and haven't played much
>>w/XnView.
>
>
> ...Irfanview is better for the image batch process features but I like
> XnView export features better. Both good programs. . .
>
> HTH
>
Excellent,

thx!

-Craig

Michael Laplante, 7/25/2006, 12:15:49 PM,
<Vsrxg.59921$B91.3150@edtnps82> wrote:

> "Craig" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:ukrxg.12092$(E-Mail Removed)...
>
> > Which do you prefer (and for what tasks)? Reason I ask is that I'm
> > more familiar w/the Gimp-Irfanview-Picassa2 cabal and haven't
> > played much w/XnView.
>
> XnView matches Irfanview almost feature for feature. (In fact, the
> author of Irfanview takes a shot at his competitor on his website,
> implying that they have been lifting their features from his program
> for several years.)
>
> However, each has just enough strong individual features that I use
> them both. Irfanview is better for the image batch process features
> but I like XnView export features better. Both good programs. . .
>
> HTH
>
> M

I prefer Irfanview for day-to-day use but XnView seems to have better
print options.