Hi.
I been trying to find some information on how MS is going to do it regarding
runtime version off access2007..
In access 2.0 ir was a runtime version
on later versions it was a ODE (OfficeDeveloperEdition)

I'm planning to upgrade one of my access projects to 2007 version (2 get a
better UI and more) but I am not able to find information on how the runtime
issue will be solved in 2007.
Any input/links are very very welcome
thanks

Presumably the Access Developer Extensions (which include the runtime) will
be part of Visual Studio Tools for Office, just as they were for Access
2003. Historically, the run-time version has always lagged behind the
developer version by a month or more.

--
Doug Steele, Microsoft Access MVP
http://I.Am/DougSteele
(no private e-mails, please)


"perove" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:6110A462-D1DA-4F83-AA53-(E-Mail Removed)...
> Hi.
> I been trying to find some information on how MS is going to do it
> regarding
> runtime version off access2007..
> In access 2.0 ir was a runtime version
> on later versions it was a ODE (OfficeDeveloperEdition)
>
> I'm planning to upgrade one of my access projects to 2007 version (2 get a
> better UI and more) but I am not able to find information on how the
> runtime
> issue will be solved in 2007.
> Any input/links are very very welcome
> thanks
>
>

Thanks for the reply doug.
The keyword is:Visual Studio Tools for Office
Seraching with that in mind im able to dowload a beta..

http://msdn.microsoft.com/office/too...E/default.aspx
tnx again

perove

"Douglas J. Steele" wrote:

> Presumably the Access Developer Extensions (which include the runtime) will
> be part of Visual Studio Tools for Office, just as they were for Access
> 2003. Historically, the run-time version has always lagged behind the
> developer ver
sion by a month or more.
>
> --
> Doug Steele, Microsoft Access MVP
> http://I.Am/DougSteele
> (no private e-mails, please)
>
>
> "perove" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:6110A462-D1DA-4F83-AA53-(E-Mail Removed)...
> > Hi.
> > I been trying to find some information on how MS is going to do it
> > regarding
> > runtime version off access2007..
> > In access 2.0 ir was a runtime version
> > on later versions it was a ODE (OfficeDeveloperEdition)
> >
> > I'm planning to upgrade one of my access projects to 2007 version (2 get a
> > better UI and more) but I am not able to find information on how the
> > runtime
> > issue will be solved in 2007.
> > Any input/links are very very welcome
> > thanks
> >
> >
>
>
>

Appreciate if anyone have the answer to this. Using an A2007 saved as A2003,
will the runtime (vsto 2005 dev.ext) works on the saved as file.

Thanks

Regards

"perove" wrote:

> Thanks for the reply doug.
> The keyword is:Visual Studio Tools for Office
> Seraching with that in mind im able to dowload a beta..
>
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/office/too...E/default.aspx
> tnx again
>
> perove
>
> "Douglas J. Steele" wrote:
>
> > Presumably the Access Developer Extensions (which include the runtime) will
> > be part of Visual Studio Tools for Office, just as they were for Access
> > 2003. Historically, the run-time version has always lagged behind the
> > developer ver
> sion by a month or more.
> >
> > --
> > Doug Steele, Microsoft Access MVP
> > http://I.Am/DougSteele
> > (no private e-mails, please)
> >
> >
> > "perove" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> > news:6110A462-D1DA-4F83-AA53-(E-Mail Removed)...
> > > Hi.
> > > I been trying to find some information on how MS is going to do it
> > > regarding
> > > runtime version off access2007..
> > > In access 2.0 ir was a runtime version
> > > on later versions it was a ODE (OfficeDeveloperEdition)
> > >
> > > I'm planning to upgrade one of my access projects to 2007 version (2 get a
> > > better UI and more) but I am not able to find information on how the
> > > runtime
> > > issue will be solved in 2007.
> > > Any input/links are very very welcome
> > > thanks
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >

Allen Yap <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>Appreciate if anyone have the answer to this.

An answer to what? Your original question has scrolled off my news
reader.

Tony
--
Tony Toews, Microsoft Access MVP
Please respond only in the newsgroups so that others can
read the entire thread of messages.
Microsoft Access Links, Hints, Tips & Accounting Systems at
http://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm

Tony Toews wrote:
> An answer to what? Your original question has scrolled off my news
> reader.

You need to bump your newsreader up past 4 weeks, hon. The original question
was Fri, Oct 06 2006 06:19 Eastern time, so it scrolled off this morning (or
last week if you only have 3 weeks set). But you can always use a web
newsreader where you won't have this annoying problem. <g>

http://www.accessmonster.com/Uwe/For...vloper-edition


--
Message posted via AccessMonster.com
http://www.accessmonster.com/Uwe/For...ccess/200611/1

"Granny Spitz via AccessMonster.com" <u26473@uwe> wrote:

>> An answer to what? Your original question has scrolled off my news
>> reader.
>
>You need to bump your newsreader up past 4 weeks, hon.

No, I only keep the last week in my system.

>But you can always use a web
>newsreader where you won't have this annoying problem. <g>
>
>http://www.accessmonster.com/Uwe/For...vloper-edition

No, I'd use Groups google instead. Also an online news reader would
likely cut my productivity by 80% so I can't be bothered.

Even then I have no idea what his question is. Unless Allen Yap is
also the original poster - perove.

Tony
--
Tony Toews, Microsoft Access MVP
Please respond only in the newsgroups so that others can
read the entire thread of messages.
Microsoft Access Links, Hints, Tips & Accounting Systems at
http://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm

Tony Toews wrote:
> Also an online news reader would
> likely cut my productivity by 80% so I can't be bothered.

Not seeing the question cuts your productivity 100%, which is *much* better.
<g>

> Even then I have no idea what his question is.

Me too. He should probably post his question in his native language. The
newsgroups are available in many different languages, not just English.

--
Message posted via AccessMonster.com
http://www.accessmonster.com/Uwe/For...ccess/200611/1

"Granny Spitz via AccessMonster.com" <u26473@uwe> wrote:

>Tony Toews wrote:
>> Also an online news reader would
>> likely cut my productivity by 80% so I can't be bothered.
>
>Not seeing the question cuts your productivity 100%, which is *much* better.
><g>

On about 0.001% of the questions. 99.999% of the posters reply within
a week. Mind you that's just a SWAG (Silly Wild *ssed Guess).

Tony
--
Tony Toews, Microsoft Access MVP
Please respond only in the newsgroups so that others can
read the entire thread of messages.
Microsoft Access Links, Hints, Tips & Accounting Systems at
http://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm

Tony Toews <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
news:(E-Mail Removed):

> "Granny Spitz via AccessMonster.com" <u26473@uwe> wrote:
>
>>Tony Toews wrote:
>>> Also an online news reader would
>>> likely cut my productivity by 80% so I can't be bothered.
>>
>>Not seeing the question cuts your productivity 100%, which is
>>*much* better. <g>
>
> On about 0.001% of the questions. 99.999% of the posters reply
> within a week. Mind you that's just a SWAG (Silly Wild *ssed
> Guess).

Perhaps you should try xNews, which allows you to doubleclick a
messageID in the References: header and pull that down from your
news server if it's not been downloaded already (or has been
purged).

I don't store anything, headers or bodies. I just get the new
headers and when I need an old article, I doubleclick the reference
listing for it.

--
David W. Fenton http://www.dfenton.com/
usenet at dfenton dot com http://www.dfenton.com/DFA/