Anna wrote:
> As to the surge protector...
>
> There are any number of "buying guides" available on the net. Why don't you
> do a Google search on "purchasing surge protector"? Here's a good one to get
> you started...
> http://computer.howstuffworks.com/surge-protector7.htm
Same scam that promotes Listerine as some kind of miracle mouth
solution also promotes those plug-in protectors to the naive. Do you
really think that silly little strip will stop what three miles could
not? And yet that is what some of those 'buying guides' are promoting.
As even Ben Franklin demonstrated in 1752, surges are not stop or
absorbed by some miracle device. Either a surge finds earth ground
destructively via a church steeple or household appliance, or it is
shunted (diverted, connected) to earth via a non-destructive path.
What is THE most critical item in protection? Earthing. What do those
grossly overpriced and ineffective protectors not have and not discuss?
Earthing.
The HowStuffWorks discussion is particularly appalling. But again,
it promotes a device that somehow will stop what miles of sky could not
- and other classic urban myths.
First page of that HowStuffWorks myth is discussed previously in
"Computer problem need help" posted on 1 Aug 2002:
http://tinyurl.com/yqyah
Meanwhile effective solutions - that are standard protection even 70
years ago - is discussed in another post complete with responsible
protector manufacturers. Does your telco, connected to overhead wires
everywhere in town, use plug-in protectors? Of course not. They need
protectors that work. That means earthing. Did you know your telco
even installs a 'whole house' protector where your phone line enters
the building? Those who promote mythical protectors fear you might
learn why the telco earths your protector for free. Because it is so
inexpensive and so effective. It actually does what the plug-in
protector cannot accomplish - protect from the typically destructive
surge. The effective telephone line protector is not discussed where
ineffective plug-in devices are promoted. Earthing is completely
avoided where plug-in protectors are promoted. But no earth ground
means no effective protection.
Even the IEEE Standards define what is required for protection. From
IEEE Red Book (IEEE Standard 141):
> In actual practice, lightning protection is achieve by the
> process of interception of lightning produced surges,
> diverting them to ground, and by altering their
> associated wave shapes.
NO earth ground means no effective protection. One 'whole house'
protector is required on AC electric where those wires enter the
building and make a 'less than 10 foot' connection to an earthing
electrode. That earthing electrode as even required by post 1990
National Electrical Code. Where does HowStuffWorks discuss any of this?