After non-specified user's activity we've got "Record(s) can't be read; no
read permissions on 'MsysModules2'" error. I went to MS KB,
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/170696 ... but the database I'm talking
about was not secured.

User has a backup copy of the database but I'd like to know if there's any
chance to restore the data from the corrupted database.

TIA

Vlado

"Vladimír Cvajniga" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote

> After non-specified user's activity we've got "Record(s)
> can't be read; no read permissions on 'MsysModules2'"
> error. I went to MS KB, http://support.microsoft.com/kb/170696 ...
> but the database I'm talking about was not secured.
>
> User has a backup copy of the database but I'd like to
> know if there's any chance to restore the data from
> the corrupted database.

Did you try Repair and Compact? In the database window, Tools | Database
Utilities | Compact and Repair.

If that doesn't work, use Google Groups to search this newsgroup's archive
and the archive of the USENET newsgroup comp.databases.ms-access for
"jetcomp".

For good information on preventing corruption, visit MVP Tony Toews' site
http://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm.

Larry Linson
Microsoft Access MVP

TYVM for your respond, Larry.

1) Repair and Compact cannot be executed since I can't open the database.
2) Jetcomp.exe (with various settings): Error compacting database.

:-(

Vlado

"Larry Linson" <(E-Mail Removed)> píše v diskusním pøíspìvku
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> "Vladimír Cvajniga" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote
>
> > After non-specified user's activity we've got "Record(s)
> > can't be read; no read permissions on 'MsysModules2'"
> > error. I went to MS KB, http://support.microsoft.com/kb/170696 ...
> > but the database I'm talking about was not secured.
> >
> > User has a backup copy of the database but I'd like to
> > know if there's any chance to restore the data from
> > the corrupted database.
>
> Did you try Repair and Compact? In the database window, Tools | Database
> Utilities | Compact and Repair.
>
> If that doesn't work, use Google Groups to search this newsgroup's archive
> and the archive of the USENET newsgroup comp.databases.ms-access for
> "jetcomp".
>
> For good information on preventing corruption, visit MVP Tony Toews' site
> http://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm.
>
> Larry Linson
> Microsoft Access MVP
>

"Larry Linson" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
news:(E-Mail Removed):

> If that doesn't work, use Google Groups to search this newsgroup's
> archive and the archive of the USENET newsgroup
> comp.databases.ms-access for "jetcomp".

Er, since it's a Microsoft utility, wouldn't it make more sense to
search support.microsoft.com?

--
David W. Fenton http://www.dfenton.com/
usenet at dfenton dot com http://www.dfenton.com/DFA/

Vladimír Cvajniga <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
news:(E-Mail Removed):

> TYVM for your respond, Larry.
>
> 1) Repair and Compact cannot be executed since I can't open the
> database. 2) Jetcomp.exe (with various settings): Error compacting
> database.

http://pksolutions.com

Peter Miller is very good at recovering data and doesn't charge
anything if he can't recover it.

--
David W. Fenton http://www.dfenton.com/
usenet at dfenton dot com http://www.dfenton.com/DFA/

On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 15:25:18 -0500, "David W. Fenton"
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>Er, since it's a Microsoft utility, wouldn't it make more sense to
>search support.microsoft.com?

If Microsoft's webpage had a better search engine, that would be the case.
Even a lot of Microsoft employees use Google Groups to search for newsgroup
posts (though maybe we shouldn't tell their bosses).

John W. Vinson [MVP]

"John W. Vinson" <jvinson@STOP_SPAM.WysardOfInfo.com> wrote
in response to, "David W. Fenton", who had written:

>>Er, since it's a Microsoft utility, wouldn't it make
>> more sense to search support.microsoft.com?
>
> If Microsoft's webpage had a better search engine,
> that would be the case. Even a lot of Microsoft
> employees use Google Groups to search for newsgroup
> posts (though maybe we shouldn't tell their bosses).

What he said!

But, David, you're probably correct -- there's a good chance that jetcomp
has been moved around the Microsoft site several times since some of those
posts linked to it.

Larry

John W. Vinson <jvinson@STOP_SPAM.WysardOfInfo.com> wrote in
news:(E-Mail Removed):

> On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 15:25:18 -0500, "David W. Fenton"
><(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>>Er, since it's a Microsoft utility, wouldn't it make more sense to
>>search support.microsoft.com?
>
> If Microsoft's webpage had a better search engine, that would be
> the case. Even a lot of Microsoft employees use Google Groups to
> search for newsgroup posts (though maybe we shouldn't tell their
> bosses).

I've never found the advanced search problematic.

I use google.com/microsoft.html for microsoft-specific searches, but
it returns results from more than just microsoft.com sites.

--
David W. Fenton http://www.dfenton.com/
usenet at dfenton dot com http://www.dfenton.com/DFA/

John W. Vinson <jvinson@STOP_SPAM.WysardOfInfo.com> wrote in
news:(E-Mail Removed):

> On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 15:25:18 -0500, "David W. Fenton"
><(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>>Er, since it's a Microsoft utility, wouldn't it make more sense to
>>search support.microsoft.com?
>
> If Microsoft's webpage had a better search engine, that would be
> the case. Even a lot of Microsoft employees use Google Groups to
> search for newsgroup posts (though maybe we shouldn't tell their
> bosses).

I missed that you said Google Groups. Why would someone search
Google Groups for this? Why not just use Google to search the web if
you don't like the search engine for support.microsoft.com (which
I've never had any problems using).

--
David W. Fenton http://www.dfenton.com/
usenet at dfenton dot com http://www.dfenton.com/DFA/