PC Review


Reply
 
 
BaBeL FiSh
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      26th Apr 2005
Anyone have an opinion on which is the better to use out of Promise or VIA
SATA on the above board?

I am currently using the VIA, and just wondered if the Promise brought about
any better performance.

Thanks.


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Paul
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      26th Apr 2005
In article <I6vbe.20068$(E-Mail Removed)>, "BaBeL FiSh"
<dcds2002@{removethis}hotmail.com> wrote:

> Anyone have an opinion on which is the better to use out of Promise or VIA
> SATA on the above board?
>
> I am currently using the VIA, and just wondered if the Promise brought about
> any better performance.
>
> Thanks.


This is what Via thinks...

http://www.via.com.tw/en/products/ch...ivestation.jsp

and here is an independent review:

http://www.gamepc.com/labs/print_con...=serialcompare

It really depends on which metric you use. On synthetic
tests, the Via can do a bit better. On a file copy test,
the Promise sometimes comes out ahead. Makes it tough to
make a choice.

The one thing we don't know here, is which of the controllers
is more reliable (corrupts array when it shouldn't etc).

Where the controllers really get differentiated, is when they
have a higher bandwidth path to memory. The ICH5R, for example,
has a shared 266MB/sec path to the Northbridge. The PCI bus
is not allowed to bottleneck the RAID in that case.

Possibly the most interesting controllers, will be the ones
that support eight SATA disks, and connect to PCI Express or
PCI-X (133MHz). Some of those are turning in hundreds of MB
per second, which is likely pointless unless you are copying
big files from one array to another.

For example, in this article, an eight port SATA controller
is used to get sustained 500MB/sec read and write on a Mac G5.

http://www.barefeats.com/hard45.html

HTH,
Paul
 
Reply With Quote
 
RonK
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      26th Apr 2005
I originally setup a Raid0 on the Via and everything worked great until I
set the overclock in bios to 10%. The raid array was lost and I could not
retrieve any data. I found a few posts that stated the Via Raid does not
like the overclock. I use the Promise Raid now with the overclock and
everything is running perfect.


"BaBeL FiSh" <dcds2002@{removethis}hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:I6vbe.20068$(E-Mail Removed)...
> Anyone have an opinion on which is the better to use out of Promise or VIA
> SATA on the above board?
>
> I am currently using the VIA, and just wondered if the Promise brought
> about any better performance.
>
> Thanks.
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Loading WinXP to Sata HHD with Sata DVD/RW dirve all connected to on board MOBO Sata Controllers Docster Windows XP General 13 1st Nov 2010 09:41 PM
Loading WinXP to Sata HHD with Sata DVD/RW dirve all connected to on board MOBO Sata Controllers Docster Windows XP Hardware 13 1st Nov 2010 09:41 PM
Loading WinXP to Sata HHD with Sata DVD/RW dirve all connected to on board MOBO Sata Controllers Docster Windows XP Help 13 1st Nov 2010 09:41 PM
Promise SATA 300 (SATA-IO) PCI controller on a a SATA 150 capable motherboard. Serge Windows XP General 7 6th Aug 2005 09:14 AM
Promise SATA 300 (SATA-IO) PCI controller on a a SATA 150 capable motherboard. Serge Windows XP Hardware 7 6th Aug 2005 09:14 AM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:26 PM.