Thats not totally correct. The problem Leif describes pertains to Soft RAID
where windows raids only the selected partitions - with soft RAID, the boot
pointers get stuffed (boot.ini arc paths get stuffed ad possiblyboot sectors
/ active partion, MBR etc. all easy to fix if you know what to do), but can
be fixed without having to fix the raid first - or at least that is what
used to happen, they could have fixed it.
With H/W controller RAID 1 the system *will* allow you to boot and carry on
(or carry on if the drive fails at run time - that is what RAID 1 is for).
When you replace the faulty drive it *will* resynch the drives - these
should be quite automatic but each controller / firmware version is subtally
different. I have not timed the nvidia implementation of resynching, but the
Intel version runs at about 80 minutes or more per 100GB - a long time. With
the Intel RAID (ICH5R / ICH6R - 865 / 875 chipsets etc.), this synch runs
while windows is running resulting in quite degraded performane for that
period, but you can use the system while this is running. Adaptec
controllers are a bit better in some respects and not as automatic in
others - at least they have Alerts.
I suggest strongly that you do a trial XP install onto RAID 1, then simulate
a failure by powering off, pulling out the power & SATA (?) connector for
the second drive, rebooting then consulting the manual and whatever happens
fiugre out what to do, what impact it has, how long it takes and so on. In
between reconnecting the 'failed' disc try a boot to confirm what I say.
It ios also important to know how you are alerted to failures: Intel flahes
a loud boot screen and shows a flasing toolbar icon when a RAID 1 fail
happens, Adaptec SATA shows nothing worth mentioning at boot time, but has
email and other alerts including syslog.
I would appreciate it if you could report back as I haven't yet configured a
RAID 1 on my A8N-E and done the above - regardless its on my own to-do list.
Have fun
HTH
"name" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news

nycf.5101$P.3437@trndny03...
>I needed that info, thanks.
>
> john
> "Leif Nordmand Andersen" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>> Hi John,
>>
>>>And, also, just to confirm, Raid 1 are mirrowed drives so if one drive
>>>fails
>>>the other takes over.
>>>Am I missing anyting?
>>
>> Well it doesn't take over automatically.
>>
>> If one drive fails, then the raid won't boot. Then you can remove the
>> faulty drive and the other 'good' drive will boot up.
>>
>> You can then add a good drive and mirror again to have raid 1 again.
>>
>> Regards Leif.
>>
>
>