http://www.techworld.com/opsys/news/...fm?NewsID=4739

9 Watts and no fans, replaces a niche that Transmeta processors
previously filled. 9W is less than the lowest-power Turion MT.

Yousuf Khan

On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 17:02:18 +0100, YKhan <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

> http://www.techworld.com/opsys/news/...fm?NewsID=4739
>
> 9 Watts and no fans, replaces a niche that Transmeta processors
> previously filled. 9W is less than the lowest-power Turion MT.

Athlon 64 1500+, what is that? a 700MHz? 64KB cache?

--
I really have no idea what this means. And since I can't install linux on
it, I'm gonna go back to surfing pr0n.
the penguins are psychotic / just smile and wave

On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 20:57:52 +0100, "hackbox.info"
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 17:02:18 +0100, YKhan <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>> http://www.techworld.com/opsys/news/...fm?NewsID=4739
>>
>> 9 Watts and no fans, replaces a niche that Transmeta processors
>> previously filled. 9W is less than the lowest-power Turion MT.
>
>Athlon 64 1500+, what is that? a 700MHz? 64KB cache?

My guess is it's around 1 to 1.4 GHz.

On 7 Nov 2005 08:02:18 -0800, "YKhan" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>http://www.techworld.com/opsys/news/...fm?NewsID=4739
>
>9 Watts and no fans, replaces a niche that Transmeta processors
>previously filled. 9W is less than the lowest-power Turion MT.
>
> Yousuf Khan


9w at full load?

If I am reading this right...THG shows a A64 3500+ only using 3.2W at
idle.

http://www6.tomshardware.com/cpu/200...m4_570-20.html

I don't think the article mentioned whether it was 9W at idle or 9W
TDP. So I'd assume TDP.

Yousuf Khan