Hello i upgraded my computer with a Herkules 9800pro and was playing UT2003
and
my FSB is 59fsb with 1024x768 no AA or what ever the name is
Is not that low???

Xp2500@1833mhz @166fsb
Asus a7v8x
Catalyst version 038
ddr 512 pc 2700@166
Via 4in1vers 2.4.1.0
Dx 9,0

Tank you out there for some advise.

mc@Sweden

Its not fsb (front side bus) its fps (frame per second). That sounds about
right. Ut2003 is highly cpu demanding because of the physics and AI.
Assuming that your framerate is from the botmatch (cpu intensive) and not
the flyby (video card intensive) those numbers are right. In ut2003, your
system is definitely being bottlenecked by the cpu. Even with a 3 Ghz P4,
your video card would still be bottlenecked by the cpu since the video is so
fast. Hope this helps
"Michael.Carlsson" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:qh0jb.33135$(E-Mail Removed)...
> Hello i upgraded my computer with a Herkules 9800pro and was playing
UT2003
> and
> my FSB is 59fsb with 1024x768 no AA or what ever the name is
> Is not that low???
>
> Xp2500@1833mhz @166fsb
> Asus a7v8x
> Catalyst version 038
> ddr 512 pc 2700@166
> Via 4in1vers 2.4.1.0
> Dx 9,0
>
> Tank you out there for some advise.
>
> mc@Sweden
>
>
>
>
>

Sounds like he needs a refresh bug fix - refreshforce can do that:
http://www.pagehosting.co.uk/rf/

Also I think there is a setting in one of the unreal2003 ini files that lets
you increase the refresh rate the game will run at.. can't remember
exactly.


"Sparrow" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:9I2jb.61322$(E-Mail Removed)...
> Its not fsb (front side bus) its fps (frame per second). That sounds about
> right. Ut2003 is highly cpu demanding because of the physics and AI.
> Assuming that your framerate is from the botmatch (cpu intensive) and not
> the flyby (video card intensive) those numbers are right. In ut2003, your
> system is definitely being bottlenecked by the cpu. Even with a 3 Ghz P4,
> your video card would still be bottlenecked by the cpu since the video is
so
> fast. Hope this helps
> "Michael.Carlsson" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:qh0jb.33135$(E-Mail Removed)...
> > Hello i upgraded my computer with a Herkules 9800pro and was playing
> UT2003
> > and
> > my FSB is 59fsb with 1024x768 no AA or what ever the name is
> > Is not that low???
> >
> > Xp2500@1833mhz @166fsb
> > Asus a7v8x
> > Catalyst version 038
> > ddr 512 pc 2700@166
> > Via 4in1vers 2.4.1.0
> > Dx 9,0
> >
> > Tank you out there for some advise.
> >
> > mc@Sweden
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>

Forgot to mention using win me
mc@Sweden
"Mark" <(E-Mail Removed)> skrev i meddelandet
news:bmj6lg$lhl$1$(E-Mail Removed)...
> Sounds like he needs a refresh bug fix - refreshforce can do that:
> http://www.pagehosting.co.uk/rf/
>
> Also I think there is a setting in one of the unreal2003 ini files that
lets
> you increase the refresh rate the game will run at.. can't remember
> exactly.
>
>
> "Sparrow" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:9I2jb.61322$(E-Mail Removed)...
> > Its not fsb (front side bus) its fps (frame per second). That sounds
about
> > right. Ut2003 is highly cpu demanding because of the physics and AI.
> > Assuming that your framerate is from the botmatch (cpu intensive) and
not
> > the flyby (video card intensive) those numbers are right. In ut2003,
your
> > system is definitely being bottlenecked by the cpu. Even with a 3 Ghz
P4,
> > your video card would still be bottlenecked by the cpu since the video
is
> so
> > fast. Hope this helps
> > "Michael.Carlsson" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> > news:qh0jb.33135$(E-Mail Removed)...
> > > Hello i upgraded my computer with a Herkules 9800pro and was playing
> > UT2003
> > > and
> > > my FSB is 59fsb with 1024x768 no AA or what ever the name is
> > > Is not that low???
> > >
> > > Xp2500@1833mhz @166fsb
> > > Asus a7v8x
> > > Catalyst version 038
> > > ddr 512 pc 2700@166
> > > Via 4in1vers 2.4.1.0
> > > Dx 9,0
> > >
> > > Tank you out there for some advise.
> > >
> > > mc@Sweden
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>