PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

9800 S-Video vs Composite quality issue

 
 
Tony DiMarzio
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      17th Oct 2003
I am experiencing a problem with my 9800 pro. Using the ATI provided
S-Video to Composite adapter, which has more pins at the S-Video end than
I've seen on normal S-Video Connectors, in conjunction with an expensive and
high-quality composite video cable, I achieve much better image quality to
the TV than with an expensive( $50.00 10ft) and high-quality S-Video cable.
Does not make any sense. The video quality should be noticeably better with
the S-Video, but in this case it is the other way around. HOWEVER!! If I use
the ATI-Provided S-Video cable the picture quality is perfect. Problem with
that is that the cable is only 3 feet, which is wayyyy to short for where my
TV is. Use the ATI-provided, short S-Video cable and everything is fine.
Use a $50 double shielded gold plated S-Video cable that is 4 meters and the
picture sucks.

Anyone experience this or have any ideas?

The S-Video quality problem mentioned above is quite noticeable with almost
a checkered pattern overlain on the TV. I tried two separate S-Video cables
besides the ATI provided cable. They both did the same thing.


--
Tony DiMarzio
(E-Mail Removed)
(E-Mail Removed)


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Steve Mattingly
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      19th Oct 2003
I have the exact same issue with my 9800. using a 12 ft. S-Video cable.


"Tony DiMarzio" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:P7GdneVOD_ullg2iRVn-(E-Mail Removed)...
> I am experiencing a problem with my 9800 pro. Using the ATI provided
> S-Video to Composite adapter, which has more pins at the S-Video end than
> I've seen on normal S-Video Connectors, in conjunction with an expensive

and
> high-quality composite video cable, I achieve much better image quality to
> the TV than with an expensive( $50.00 10ft) and high-quality S-Video

cable.
> Does not make any sense. The video quality should be noticeably better

with
> the S-Video, but in this case it is the other way around. HOWEVER!! If I

use
> the ATI-Provided S-Video cable the picture quality is perfect. Problem

with
> that is that the cable is only 3 feet, which is wayyyy to short for where

my
> TV is. Use the ATI-provided, short S-Video cable and everything is fine.
> Use a $50 double shielded gold plated S-Video cable that is 4 meters and

the
> picture sucks.
>
> Anyone experience this or have any ideas?
>
> The S-Video quality problem mentioned above is quite noticeable with

almost
> a checkered pattern overlain on the TV. I tried two separate S-Video

cables
> besides the ATI provided cable. They both did the same thing.
>
>
> --
> Tony DiMarzio
> (E-Mail Removed)
> (E-Mail Removed)
>
>



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.528 / Virus Database: 324 - Release Date: 10/16/03


 
Reply With Quote
 
JAD
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      19th Oct 2003
u guys have used the 'advanced' features in display properties....focus sharpness color etc?


"Tony DiMarzio" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:P7GdneVOD_ullg2iRVn-(E-Mail Removed)...
> I am experiencing a problem with my 9800 pro. Using the ATI provided
> S-Video to Composite adapter, which has more pins at the S-Video end than
> I've seen on normal S-Video Connectors, in conjunction with an expensive and
> high-quality composite video cable, I achieve much better image quality to
> the TV than with an expensive( $50.00 10ft) and high-quality S-Video cable.
> Does not make any sense. The video quality should be noticeably better with
> the S-Video, but in this case it is the other way around. HOWEVER!! If I use
> the ATI-Provided S-Video cable the picture quality is perfect. Problem with
> that is that the cable is only 3 feet, which is wayyyy to short for where my
> TV is. Use the ATI-provided, short S-Video cable and everything is fine.
> Use a $50 double shielded gold plated S-Video cable that is 4 meters and the
> picture sucks.
>
> Anyone experience this or have any ideas?
>
> The S-Video quality problem mentioned above is quite noticeable with almost
> a checkered pattern overlain on the TV. I tried two separate S-Video cables
> besides the ATI provided cable. They both did the same thing.
>
>
> --
> Tony DiMarzio
> (E-Mail Removed)
> (E-Mail Removed)
>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Tony DiMarzio
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      20th Oct 2003
Of course! Have tried tweaking every setting that exists in the ATI control
panel. All things being equal... I achieve considerably better quality with
a 12ft composite cable hooked into the ATI S-Video to composite adapter than
I do with a very high quality 12ft S-Video cable. However, and like I've
said, using the supplied 3ft ATI S-Video cable the picture quality is great.
makes no sense. I'm hoping that ATI doesn't have some proprietary liking to
only certain S-Video cables, but right now that seems the only explanation.

--
Tony DiMarzio
(E-Mail Removed)
(E-Mail Removed)
"JAD" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:2aDkb.4370$(E-Mail Removed)...
> u guys have used the 'advanced' features in display properties....focus

sharpness color etc?
>
>
> "Tony DiMarzio" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message

news:P7GdneVOD_ullg2iRVn-(E-Mail Removed)...
> > I am experiencing a problem with my 9800 pro. Using the ATI provided
> > S-Video to Composite adapter, which has more pins at the S-Video end

than
> > I've seen on normal S-Video Connectors, in conjunction with an expensive

and
> > high-quality composite video cable, I achieve much better image quality

to
> > the TV than with an expensive( $50.00 10ft) and high-quality S-Video

cable.
> > Does not make any sense. The video quality should be noticeably better

with
> > the S-Video, but in this case it is the other way around. HOWEVER!! If I

use
> > the ATI-Provided S-Video cable the picture quality is perfect. Problem

with
> > that is that the cable is only 3 feet, which is wayyyy to short for

where my
> > TV is. Use the ATI-provided, short S-Video cable and everything is fine.
> > Use a $50 double shielded gold plated S-Video cable that is 4 meters and

the
> > picture sucks.
> >
> > Anyone experience this or have any ideas?
> >
> > The S-Video quality problem mentioned above is quite noticeable with

almost
> > a checkered pattern overlain on the TV. I tried two separate S-Video

cables
> > besides the ATI provided cable. They both did the same thing.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Tony DiMarzio
> > (E-Mail Removed)
> > (E-Mail Removed)
> >
> >

>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Tony DiMarzio
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      20th Oct 2003
so have you reverted to using a composite cable instead? I have because
right now I have no other choice.

--
Tony DiMarzio
(E-Mail Removed)
(E-Mail Removed)
"Steve Mattingly" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> I have the exact same issue with my 9800. using a 12 ft. S-Video cable.
>
>
> "Tony DiMarzio" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:P7GdneVOD_ullg2iRVn-(E-Mail Removed)...
> > I am experiencing a problem with my 9800 pro. Using the ATI provided
> > S-Video to Composite adapter, which has more pins at the S-Video end

than
> > I've seen on normal S-Video Connectors, in conjunction with an expensive

> and
> > high-quality composite video cable, I achieve much better image quality

to
> > the TV than with an expensive( $50.00 10ft) and high-quality S-Video

> cable.
> > Does not make any sense. The video quality should be noticeably better

> with
> > the S-Video, but in this case it is the other way around. HOWEVER!! If I

> use
> > the ATI-Provided S-Video cable the picture quality is perfect. Problem

> with
> > that is that the cable is only 3 feet, which is wayyyy to short for

where
> my
> > TV is. Use the ATI-provided, short S-Video cable and everything is fine.
> > Use a $50 double shielded gold plated S-Video cable that is 4 meters and

> the
> > picture sucks.
> >
> > Anyone experience this or have any ideas?
> >
> > The S-Video quality problem mentioned above is quite noticeable with

> almost
> > a checkered pattern overlain on the TV. I tried two separate S-Video

> cables
> > besides the ATI provided cable. They both did the same thing.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Tony DiMarzio
> > (E-Mail Removed)
> > (E-Mail Removed)
> >
> >

>
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.528 / Virus Database: 324 - Release Date: 10/16/03
>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is Svideo -> Scart better quality than composite of the same? anfarrow Audio / Video / Home Theatre 2 22nd Mar 2007 05:37 PM
Low quality 2d display with a very high quality video card =?Utf-8?B?U2FtIEhlbG15?= Windows XP Video 0 28th Jun 2006 11:35 PM
No Composite with AIW 9800 Pro Tom Lake ATI Video Cards 0 27th Jan 2006 01:55 PM
AIW 9800 Pro TV Out Quality? Richard Forester ATI Video Cards 1 29th Jun 2005 10:38 AM
Curious About Quality of All-In-Wonder Pro 9800 T. Scott Lad ATI Video Cards 2 24th Jun 2004 12:50 PM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:24 PM.