PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

48-bit HD Support Failed

 
 
Sparks
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      2nd Jan 2004
I'm trying to use a Western Digital 160 GB drive without
a slave, and I'm still hit with the 137 limitation after
trying several fixes. Here's what I've done -

- Started with a single 15GB partition for OS (Windows XP
Pro)
- Updated to include ALL service packs
- Followed all instructions in article Q303013
(http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-
us;303013)
- Applied the Atapi.sys version 5.1.2600.1135 hot fix
from article 331958
(http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-
US;331958)
- Updated motherboard (ASUS A7A266) bios to version 1012
which supports 48-bit according to their website
(http://www.asus.com/support/english/.../48bithdd/inde
x.aspx)

All registry and bios settings are now correct, all
hardware should be compatible, and OS should be
compatible. But when I go to format the second
partition, it only allows me to do 113GB! The Western
Digital software doesn't help because it won't allow
changes to the OS drive (the only one in the machine).

I am at a loss! Anyone have any other work arounds or
suggestions? Thanks!
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Rich Barry
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      2nd Jan 2004
Sparks, have you tried partitioning and formatting with a boot disk. Check
here www.bootdisk.com
"Sparks" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:064701c3d15d$40763c00$(E-Mail Removed)...
> I'm trying to use a Western Digital 160 GB drive without
> a slave, and I'm still hit with the 137 limitation after
> trying several fixes. Here's what I've done -
>
> - Started with a single 15GB partition for OS (Windows XP
> Pro)
> - Updated to include ALL service packs
> - Followed all instructions in article Q303013
> (http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-
> us;303013)
> - Applied the Atapi.sys version 5.1.2600.1135 hot fix
> from article 331958
> (http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-
> US;331958)
> - Updated motherboard (ASUS A7A266) bios to version 1012
> which supports 48-bit according to their website
> (http://www.asus.com/support/english/.../48bithdd/inde
> x.aspx)
>
> All registry and bios settings are now correct, all
> hardware should be compatible, and OS should be
> compatible. But when I go to format the second
> partition, it only allows me to do 113GB! The Western
> Digital software doesn't help because it won't allow
> changes to the OS drive (the only one in the machine).
>
> I am at a loss! Anyone have any other work arounds or
> suggestions? Thanks!



 
Reply With Quote
 
Andy
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      3rd Jan 2004
Are you running XP's Disk Management? It should show you the entire
drive, including existing partitions and unallocated space.

On Fri, 2 Jan 2004 10:21:34 -0800, "Sparks"
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>I'm trying to use a Western Digital 160 GB drive without
>a slave, and I'm still hit with the 137 limitation after
>trying several fixes. Here's what I've done -
>
>- Started with a single 15GB partition for OS (Windows XP
>Pro)
>- Updated to include ALL service packs
>- Followed all instructions in article Q303013
>(http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-
>us;303013)
>- Applied the Atapi.sys version 5.1.2600.1135 hot fix
>from article 331958
>(http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-
>US;331958)
>- Updated motherboard (ASUS A7A266) bios to version 1012
>which supports 48-bit according to their website
>(http://www.asus.com/support/english/.../48bithdd/inde
>x.aspx)
>
>All registry and bios settings are now correct, all
>hardware should be compatible, and OS should be
>compatible. But when I go to format the second
>partition, it only allows me to do 113GB! The Western
>Digital software doesn't help because it won't allow
>changes to the OS drive (the only one in the machine).
>
>I am at a loss! Anyone have any other work arounds or
>suggestions? Thanks!


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Http Post Error: A connection attempt failed because the connectedparty did not properly respond after a period of time, or establishedconnection failed because connected host has failed to respond. Deepu Microsoft Dot NET Framework 1 9th Jul 2009 06:09 PM
Network adapters failed to support NDISReadNetworkAddress function klai@klcconsulting.net Windows Vista General Discussion 4 16th Apr 2009 06:15 PM
Network adapters failed to support NDISReadNetworkAddress function klai@klcconsulting.net Windows Vista Hardware 4 16th Apr 2009 06:15 PM
Network adapters failed to support NDISReadNetworkAddress function klai@klcconsulting.net Windows Vista Networking 4 16th Apr 2009 06:15 PM
USB Printing Support - failed Paddy Landau Windows Vista Print / Fax / Scan 0 22nd Aug 2007 08:52 AM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:34 PM.