PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

4 x DDR = Slower?

 
 
Paul Kelly
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      28th Aug 2005
I just updated my old p4 3ghz with MSI 875P chipset from 1 to 2gb of
memory. it had 2x512mb (PC3200 cas2) corsair twinx. now it has 4 of them.

suddenly the BIOS reports the memory speed as 266 (133 DDR) instead of
400DDR (200DDR).

take any of the two sets and its back to 400 again.

anyone know why this would happen?

Paul

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
daytripper
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      29th Aug 2005
On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 17:39:03 -0500, Paul Kelly <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>I just updated my old p4 3ghz with MSI 875P chipset from 1 to 2gb of
>memory. it had 2x512mb (PC3200 cas2) corsair twinx. now it has 4 of them.
>
>suddenly the BIOS reports the memory speed as 266 (133 DDR) instead of
>400DDR (200DDR).
>
>take any of the two sets and its back to 400 again.
>
>anyone know why this would happen?
>
>Paul


Because the memory buses can't make timing at 400mhz with more than two dimms
installed...
 
Reply With Quote
 
Paul Kelly
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      29th Aug 2005
daytripper <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
news:(E-Mail Removed):

> On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 17:39:03 -0500, Paul Kelly <(E-Mail Removed)>
> wrote:
>
> Because the memory buses can't make timing at 400mhz with more than
> two dimms installed...


looks that way

 
Reply With Quote
 
Captin
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      29th Aug 2005
"" wrote:
> I just updated my old p4 3ghz with MSI 875P chipset from 1 to
> 2gb of
> memory. it had 2x512mb (PC3200 cas2) corsair twinx. now it has
> 4 of them.
>
> suddenly the BIOS reports the memory speed as 266 (133 DDR)
> instead of
> 400DDR (200DDR).
>
> take any of the two sets and its back to 400 again.
>
> anyone know why this would happen?
>
> Paul


You are not on your own with this issue. It makes me ask why these
companies bother making the motherboard with 4 DIMM slots in the first
place?

--
Posted using the http://www.hardwareforumz.com interface, at author's request
Articles individually checked for conformance to usenet standards
Topic URL: http://www.hardwareforumz.com/Chips-...pict61264.html
Visit Topic URL to contact author (reg. req'd). Report abuse: http://www.hardwareforumz.com/eform.php?p=309272
 
Reply With Quote
 
George Macdonald
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      29th Aug 2005
On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 21:27:48 -0500, Paul Kelly <(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote:

>daytripper <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
>news:(E-Mail Removed):
>
>> On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 17:39:03 -0500, Paul Kelly <(E-Mail Removed)>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Because the memory buses can't make timing at 400mhz with more than
>> two dimms installed...

>
>looks that way


Are those double sided DIMMs... i.e. you now have 4 ranks of memory on each
channel? Have you tried setting the timings and speed manually in BIOS
Setup: raise the CAS latency & other timings by a clock tick and then raise
the clock rate? Sometimes that'll work. I always advise people to get
single sided DIMMs now to help avoid bus load problems, such as those:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16820146541

--
Rgds, George Macdonald
 
Reply With Quote
 
Paul Kelly
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      29th Aug 2005
George Macdonald <fammacd=!SPAM^(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
news:(E-Mail Removed):


>I always
> advise people to get single sided DIMMs now to help avoid bus load
> problems, such as those:
> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16820146541


I tried disabling SPD and setting 2-3-3-6, all boots ok but still 266.
this is a dump of my memory spd.

new ram : 200mhz = 2-3-2-6
old ram : 200mhz = 3-3-3-8

maybe this mix has forced the pc into some sort of compromise. i dont
know much about CAS/RAS Precharges. I had to look up the meaning of SPD

I think the answer would be sell the memory and stick to two 1gb modules
but its not really worth it on a 2 year old pc. think ill just wander in
the slow lane until those nice AMD socket 1207 board show up

Paul

Memory SPD
---------------------------------------------------------------------

DIMM #1

General
Memory type DDR-SDRAM
Manufacturer (ID) Corsair (7F7F9E0000000000)
Size 512 MBytes
Max bandwidth PC3200 (200 MHz)
Part number CMX512-3200C2
Manufacturing date Week 00/Year 00

Attributes
Number of banks 2
Data width 64 bits
Correction None
Registered no
Buffered no

Timings table
Frequency (MHz) 133 166 200
CAS# 2.0 2.5 3.0
RAS# to CAS# delay 2 3 3
RAS# Precharge 2 3 3
TRAS# 6 7 8


DIMM #2

General
Memory type DDR-SDRAM
Manufacturer (ID) Corsair (7F7F9E0000000000)
Size 512 MBytes
Max bandwidth PC3200 (200 MHz)
Part number CMX512-3200LL
Manufacturing date Week 00/Year 00

Attributes
Number of banks 2
Data width 64 bits
Correction None
Registered no
Buffered no

Timings table
Frequency (MHz) 200
CAS# 2.0
RAS# to CAS# delay 3
RAS# Precharge 2
TRAS# 6


DIMM #3

General
Memory type DDR-SDRAM
Manufacturer (ID) Corsair (7F7F9E0000000000)
Size 512 MBytes
Max bandwidth PC3200 (200 MHz)
Part number CMX512-3200C2
Manufacturing date Week 00/Year 00

Attributes
Number of banks 2
Data width 64 bits
Correction None
Registered no
Buffered no

Timings table
Frequency (MHz) 133 166 200
CAS# 2.0 2.5 3.0
RAS# to CAS# delay 2 3 3
RAS# Precharge 2 3 3
TRAS# 6 7 8


DIMM #4

General
Memory type DDR-SDRAM
Manufacturer (ID) Corsair (7F7F9E0000000000)
Size 512 MBytes
Max bandwidth PC3200 (200 MHz)
Part number CMX512-3200LL
Manufacturing date Week 00/Year 00

Attributes
Number of banks 2
Data width 64 bits
Correction None
Registered no
Buffered no

Timings table
Frequency (MHz) 200
CAS# 2.0
RAS# to CAS# delay 3
RAS# Precharge 2
TRAS# 6


 
Reply With Quote
 
George Macdonald
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      30th Aug 2005
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 17:34:24 -0500, Paul Kelly <(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote:

>George Macdonald <fammacd=!SPAM^(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
>news:(E-Mail Removed):
>
>
>>I always
>> advise people to get single sided DIMMs now to help avoid bus load
>> problems, such as those:
>> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16820146541

>
>I tried disabling SPD and setting 2-3-3-6, all boots ok but still 266.
>this is a dump of my memory spd.
>
>new ram : 200mhz = 2-3-2-6
>old ram : 200mhz = 3-3-3-8
>
>maybe this mix has forced the pc into some sort of compromise. i dont
>know much about CAS/RAS Precharges. I had to look up the meaning of SPD


Sometimes BIOS auto-settings just don't get it right. I'd say 2-3-3-6 is
way too ambitious here to get all 4 DIMMs working at DDR400; in fact there
are not many modules around which work at CASL=2 in any system. I'd start
with 3-3-3-8 and maybe even slower than that (3-4-4-10) and if possible
tighten back up when you get it working.

--
Rgds, George Macdonald
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Code in PP2007 to manipulate shapes runs slower and slower James Microsoft Powerpoint 7 28th Sep 2009 04:58 PM
Vista Copy Speed over the network is slower that XP SP2 and OSX..much slower? Sam Windows Vista General Discussion 9 27th Jun 2008 05:39 PM
Vista Copy Speed over the network is slower that XP SP2 and OSX..much slower? Sam Windows Vista Networking 1 20th Jun 2008 09:19 PM
Remote Desktop Connection gets slower and slower, reboot helps =?Utf-8?B?TWlrZUI=?= Windows XP Work Remotely 5 17th Oct 2004 08:17 PM
A7N8X Deluxe - more memory = slower? or Corsair XMS = slower? Erik Harris Asus Motherboards 2 8th Aug 2004 06:56 PM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:22 PM.