PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

3D Test results seem low

 
 
Rev Marc
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      13th Oct 2003
Any opinions?
====================
3DMark Score 4895 3DMarks

CPU Score 523.0 CPUMarks

Feature Tests

Fill Rate (Single-Texturing) 1469.4 MTexels/s

Fill Rate (Multi-Texturing) 2279.3 MTexels/s

Vertex Shader 15.7 fps

Pixel Shader 2.0 44.5 fps

Ragtroll 21.0 fps

--------------------------------------

System Configuration

Operating System Microsoft Windows XP

DirectX Version 9.0b

Mobo Manufacturer MICRO-STAR INC.

Mobo Model MS-6742

AGP Rates (Current/Available) 8x / 4x, 8x

CPU Intel Pentium 4 2400 MHz

FSB 200 MHz

Memory 512 MB

Display Information

Graphics Chipset ATI RADEON 9800 PRO

Driver Name RADEON 9800 PRO

Driver Version 6.14.10.6387

Driver WHQL Certified Yes

Video Memory 128 MB

Core Clock 324 MHz

Memory Clock 290 MHz

Sound Information

Sound Adapter Driver Name C-Media Wave Device

Sound Adapter Driver Version 5.12.1.29

Benchmark Settings

Program Version 3DMark03 Revision 2 Build 0

Resolution 1024x768@32 bit

Texture Filtering Optimal

Pixel Processing / Antialiasing None

Post Processing false

Vertex Shaders Optimal



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
spamtrap@localhost
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      13th Oct 2003
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 13:04:58 -0500, "Rev Marc" <Rev@Kingdomof Heaven>
wrote:

>Any opinions?


You should use the online result browser.
--
Andrew. To email unscramble (E-Mail Removed) & remove spamtrap.
Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards,
please don't top post. Trim messages to quote only relevent text.
Check groups.google.com before asking a question.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Rev Marc
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      13th Oct 2003
Isnt there a fee for that?

thx

<spamtrap@localhost> wrote in message
news(E-Mail Removed)...
> On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 13:04:58 -0500, "Rev Marc" <Rev@Kingdomof Heaven>
> wrote:
>
> >Any opinions?

>
> You should use the online result browser.
> --
> Andrew. To email unscramble (E-Mail Removed) & remove spamtrap.
> Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards,
> please don't top post. Trim messages to quote only relevent text.
> Check groups.google.com before asking a question.



 
Reply With Quote
 
Rev Marc
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      13th Oct 2003
*For some unkown reasons, windows and various utilities identify the VC Card
as a 9800 Pro when it is only the 9800 model (not Pro). See asterisks for
corrections!

> 3DMark Score 4895 3DMarks
>
> CPU Score 523.0 CPUMarks
>
> Feature Tests
>
> Fill Rate (Single-Texturing) 1469.4 MTexels/s
>
> Fill Rate (Multi-Texturing) 2279.3 MTexels/s
>
> Vertex Shader 15.7 fps
>
> Pixel Shader 2.0 44.5 fps
>
> Ragtroll 21.0 fps
>
> --------------------------------------
>
> System Configuration
>
> Operating System Microsoft Windows XP; *SP1
>
> DirectX Version 9.0b
>
> Mobo Manufacturer MICRO-STAR INC.
>
> Mobo Model MS-6; 742; *800 FSB
>
> AGP Rates (Current/Available) 8x / 4x, 8x
>
> CPU Intel Pentium 4 2400 MHz; *800 mhz
>
> FSB 200 MHz; total 800 FSB
>
> Memory 512 MB; *dual 400 DDR sticks
>
> Display Information
>
> Graphics Chipset *ATI RADEON 9800
>
> Driver Name RADEON 9800
>
> Driver Version 6.14.10.6387
>
> Driver WHQL Certified Yes
>
> Video Memory 128 MB
>
> Core Clock 324 MHz
>
> Memory Clock 290 MHz
>
> Sound Information
>
> Sound Adapter Driver Name C-Media Wave Device
>
> Sound Adapter Driver Version 5.12.1.29
>
> Benchmark Settings
>
> Program Version 3DMark03 Revision 2 Build 0
>
> Resolution 1024x768@32 bit
>
> Texture Filtering Optimal
>
> Pixel Processing / Antialiasing None
>
> Post Processing false
>
> Vertex Shaders Optimal
>
>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Skid
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      13th Oct 2003
No fee, but understand when you compare that most of the really high scores
for systems like yours will have the video card overclocked close to
meltdown levels. At 324/290, yours is a 9800 non-pro.

Your scores are exactly where I would expect them to be.

"Rev Marc" <Rev@Kingdomof Heaven> wrote in message
news:7ZGdnQOxOsJ8cBeiU-(E-Mail Removed)...
> Isnt there a fee for that?
>
> thx
>
> <spamtrap@localhost> wrote in message
> news(E-Mail Removed)...
> > On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 13:04:58 -0500, "Rev Marc" <Rev@Kingdomof Heaven>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >Any opinions?

> >
> > You should use the online result browser.
> > --
> > Andrew. To email unscramble (E-Mail Removed) & remove spamtrap.
> > Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards,
> > please don't top post. Trim messages to quote only relevent text.
> > Check groups.google.com before asking a question.

>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
TEST RESULTS ZigZagZak Microsoft Access Queries 1 13th Aug 2008 06:31 PM
very disconcerting test results Richard Urban Windows Vista General Discussion 16 25th Aug 2007 09:05 PM
Re:KERNEL_STACK_INPAGE_ERROR (test results) utwoguru Windows XP Hardware 0 14th Aug 2007 09:25 PM
results from test maureen Windows XP Security 1 17th Jan 2006 10:58 PM
Re: New test results Alexander Muylaert Microsoft C# .NET 0 27th May 2004 06:07 PM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:56 PM.