Finally got 3D mark to run, and scored 5366.
I have got a 9800 Pro 128Mb, 1.5 gig PC3200, AMD XP 2400+ all stock.
Could not get compare results to run. Is this score ok, or really bad?
Ta

--
Victoria Concordia Crescit

Sorry meant to say, 3D mark 03.

--
Victoria Concordia Crescit
"KerplunKuK" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Finally got 3D mark to run, and scored 5366.
> I have got a 9800 Pro 128Mb, 1.5 gig PC3200, AMD XP 2400+ all stock.
> Could not get compare results to run. Is this score ok, or really bad?
> Ta
>
> --
> Victoria Concordia Crescit
>
>

"KerplunKuK" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Sorry meant to say, 3D mark 03.
>
> --
> Victoria Concordia Crescit
> "KerplunKuK" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> > Finally got 3D mark to run, and scored 5366.
> > I have got a 9800 Pro 128Mb, 1.5 gig PC3200, AMD XP 2400+ all stock.
> > Could not get compare results to run. Is this score ok, or really bad?
> > Ta
> >
> > --
> > Victoria Concordia Crescit
> >
> >
>
>
Sounds about right to me Victoria .
Here's mine (similar specs)

3DMark03 = 5592 pts

ASUS A7N8X Deluxe Rev 2.0 (1007)
Barton xp2800+ @10.5x200 2.10GHz
Corsair TwinX 512MB 3200LL
Sapphire Radeon 9800Pro
2x 80GB SATA Seagate Barracuda (Raid 0)
1x 120GB Western Digital Caviar SE
Enermax 460W PSU
NEC DVD+RW
Audigy 2 Platinum Ex
Sirocco Crossfire Speakers

Andy_G

Hmmm... is that all the 9800 pro can push out ? I thought people were
getting in the 6000+ range with faster CPUs.

I'm running an XP1800+ at stock speed with my Sapphire 9800 pro and I get
5255.


"KerplunKuK" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Finally got 3D mark to run, and scored 5366.
> I have got a 9800 Pro 128Mb, 1.5 gig PC3200, AMD XP 2400+ all stock.
> Could not get compare results to run. Is this score ok, or really bad?
> Ta
>
> --
> Victoria Concordia Crescit
>
>

ME <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

> 3DMark03 = 5592 pts
>
> ASUS A7N8X Deluxe Rev 2.0 (1007)
> Barton xp2800+ @10.5x200 2.10GHz
> Corsair TwinX 512MB 3200LL
> Sapphire Radeon 9800Pro
> 2x 80GB SATA Seagate Barracuda (Raid 0)
> 1x 120GB Western Digital Caviar SE
> Enermax 460W PSU
> NEC DVD+RW
> Audigy 2 Platinum Ex
> Sirocco Crossfire Speakers

With my R9700 Pro I got >6k :-)
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2337547 :-)

--
maniac(at)chello.pl

"?uzzled" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:40a12e94$0$20507$(E-Mail Removed)...
> Hmmm... is that all the 9800 pro can push out ? I thought people were
> getting in the 6000+ range with faster CPUs.
>
> I'm running an XP1800+ at stock speed with my Sapphire 9800 pro and I get
> 5255.


What processes should I end to get better results?

--
Victoria Concordia Crescit

On 5/11/2004 12:11 PM ME brightened our day with:

>
>>>Finally got 3D mark to run, and scored 5366.
>>>I have got a 9800 Pro 128Mb, 1.5 gig PC3200, AMD XP 2400+ all stock.
>>>Could not get compare results to run. Is this score ok, or really bad?
>>>Ta
>>>
>>>--
>>>Victoria Concordia Crescit
>>>
>>>
>Sounds about right to me Victoria .
>
>
LOL, that's Latin, not a name.
So either I'm laughing with you or at you, either way, no offense intended.

--
Steve [Inglo]

> LOL, that's Latin, not a name.
> So either I'm laughing with you or at you, either way, no offense
> intended.

'Victory through teamwork'. An Arsenal footbal club supporter (as in the football, the version
played everywhere except the USA).

You should really call him 'Arse' instead of 'Victoria'

S (not an Arsenal supporter, obviously)

?uzzled wrote:
> Hmmm... is that all the 9800 pro can push out ? I thought people were
> getting in the 6000+ range with faster CPUs.
>
> I'm running an XP1800+ at stock speed with my Sapphire 9800 pro and I
> get 5255.
>
>
> "KerplunKuK" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>> Finally got 3D mark to run, and scored 5366.
>> I have got a 9800 Pro 128Mb, 1.5 gig PC3200, AMD XP 2400+ all stock.
>> Could not get compare results to run. Is this score ok, or really
>> bad? Ta
>>
>> --
>> Victoria Concordia Crescit

I get 5500 with a XP2100+ and GeCube 9800Pro. When I first got it I
overclocked it to 400/750 and still scored 5500 so I put it down to a FSB
bottleneck. Runs plenty fast enough at standard settings though.

On Tue, 11 May 2004 20:50:52 +0100, "?uzzled" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>Hmmm... is that all the 9800 pro can push out ? I thought people were
>getting in the 6000+ range with faster CPUs.
>
>I'm running an XP1800+ at stock speed with my Sapphire 9800 pro and I get
>5255.
>
>

That's amazing. Is that score at 133 FSB, and what
motherboard/chipset is that? And what RAM latency settings? I'm
running a 2600+ slightly overclocked to 2.22 ghz (16x139 FSB) and
still only score 5300 with my OEM Sapphire 9800 Pro (at default
speed). In fact it appears to me that CPU speed barely affects the
3dMark 03 score at all. My system sucks, it always benches less than
"comparable" systems on graphics benchmarks. I'm guessing it's
because I have some crap MSI-crippleware fake KT3 Ultra2-C
motherboard. Thanks MSI!