Hello-

I bought two identical 320GB WD HD.
My operating system was on a separate hard drive. These 320GB HD's
were used only for storage.

Then, my OS had to be reinstalled a few months ago. After I
reinstalled my OS (WinXP Pro) I tried connecting my two WD HD's but
they were not detected by my operating system as FULL hard drives. It
kept saying that the space on them was "Unallocated".
I downloaded Data Lifeguard Tools and followed instructions to install
ONE of my hard drives and it worked fine but i lost all of my data
because it FORMATTED IT.

Luckily I didn't do it on both of my 320GB HDs so I still have one
more hard drive that still has my files on it but I am afraid to run
the Data Lifeguard Tools because I don't want to format it. I
- WinXP Disk Manager recognizes all three of my HDs.
- The 80GB one is deemed "Healthy"
- 1st 320GB one is also deemed "Healthy" because I formatted it with
Data Lifeguard Tools, - - And the 2nd 320GB one is deemed
"Unallocated" in the Disk Manager even though it has more than 200GB
worth of data that i've been saving on it for years (pictures, videos
etc...)

The HD's are recognized by both, the BIOS, and the OS but for some
reason once I re imaged my computer I am NOT able to view what is
INSIDE the hard drive.

I did not change anything between the re imaging. My operating system
stayed the same, and my hard drives were fine before the re image.

Anybody knows how to make my HD readable? Western Digital was not
helpful with this...

Thank you in advance.

Senad

First I would try running a program that can analyze and repair
partitions.
<http://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&channel=s&hl=en&q=repair+partition&btnG=Google+Search>
If that does not fix the problem, run a file recovery program.
<http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&channel=s&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&hs=QsT&q=file+recovery&btnG=Search>

On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 03:51:49 -0000, (E-Mail Removed) wrote:

>Hello-
>
>I bought two identical 320GB WD HD.
>My operating system was on a separate hard drive. These 320GB HD's
>were used only for storage.
>
>Then, my OS had to be reinstalled a few months ago. After I
>reinstalled my OS (WinXP Pro) I tried connecting my two WD HD's but
>they were not detected by my operating system as FULL hard drives. It
>kept saying that the space on them was "Unallocated".
>I downloaded Data Lifeguard Tools and followed instructions to install
>ONE of my hard drives and it worked fine but i lost all of my data
>because it FORMATTED IT.
>
>Luckily I didn't do it on both of my 320GB HDs so I still have one
>more hard drive that still has my files on it but I am afraid to run
>the Data Lifeguard Tools because I don't want to format it. I
>- WinXP Disk Manager recognizes all three of my HDs.
>- The 80GB one is deemed "Healthy"
>- 1st 320GB one is also deemed "Healthy" because I formatted it with
>Data Lifeguard Tools, - - And the 2nd 320GB one is deemed
>"Unallocated" in the Disk Manager even though it has more than 200GB
>worth of data that i've been saving on it for years (pictures, videos
>etc...)
>
>The HD's are recognized by both, the BIOS, and the OS but for some
>reason once I re imaged my computer I am NOT able to view what is
>INSIDE the hard drive.
>
>I did not change anything between the re imaging. My operating system
>stayed the same, and my hard drives were fine before the re image.
>
>Anybody knows how to make my HD readable? Western Digital was not
>helpful with this...
>
>Thank you in advance.
>
>Senad

Hello,

Try enabling 48-bit LBA
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/303013

--
Singapore Web Design
http://www.bootstrike.com/Webdesign/
Singapore Web Hosting
http://www.bootstrike.com/WinXP/faq.html
Windows XP FAQ

<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Hello-
>
> I bought two identical 320GB WD HD.
> My operating system was on a separate hard drive. These 320GB HD's
> were used only for storage.
>
> Then, my OS had to be reinstalled a few months ago. After I
> reinstalled my OS (WinXP Pro) I tried connecting my two WD HD's but
> they were not detected by my operating system as FULL hard drives. It
> kept saying that the space on them was "Unallocated".
> I downloaded Data Lifeguard Tools and followed instructions to install
> ONE of my hard drives and it worked fine but i lost all of my data
> because it FORMATTED IT.
>
> Luckily I didn't do it on both of my 320GB HDs so I still have one
> more hard drive that still has my files on it but I am afraid to run
> the Data Lifeguard Tools because I don't want to format it. I
> - WinXP Disk Manager recognizes all three of my HDs.
> - The 80GB one is deemed "Healthy"
> - 1st 320GB one is also deemed "Healthy" because I formatted it with
> Data Lifeguard Tools, - - And the 2nd 320GB one is deemed
> "Unallocated" in the Disk Manager even though it has more than 200GB
> worth of data that i've been saving on it for years (pictures, videos
> etc...)
>
> The HD's are recognized by both, the BIOS, and the OS but for some
> reason once I re imaged my computer I am NOT able to view what is
> INSIDE the hard drive.
>
> I did not change anything between the re imaging. My operating system
> stayed the same, and my hard drives were fine before the re image.
>
> Anybody knows how to make my HD readable? Western Digital was not
> helpful with this...
>
> Thank you in advance.
>
> Senad
>

in my bios i had to set drive type to LARGE insted of LBA
second thing, maybe they were in RAID config ? check bios config and
buildin raid controller bios if you hat such

You may have to take ownership of the drive and folders because you
reinstalled XP. XP recognises them as belonging to an identity that no
longer exists on your PC since you reintalled the OS (ie. your previous
identity is different from your current identity in XP). Using the same
log-on name makes no difference.

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/308421


<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Hello-
>
> I bought two identical 320GB WD HD.
> My operating system was on a separate hard drive. These 320GB HD's
> were used only for storage.
>
> Then, my OS had to be reinstalled a few months ago. After I
> reinstalled my OS (WinXP Pro) I tried connecting my two WD HD's but
> they were not detected by my operating system as FULL hard drives. It
> kept saying that the space on them was "Unallocated".
> I downloaded Data Lifeguard Tools and followed instructions to install
> ONE of my hard drives and it worked fine but i lost all of my data
> because it FORMATTED IT.
>
> Luckily I didn't do it on both of my 320GB HDs so I still have one
> more hard drive that still has my files on it but I am afraid to run
> the Data Lifeguard Tools because I don't want to format it. I
> - WinXP Disk Manager recognizes all three of my HDs.
> - The 80GB one is deemed "Healthy"
> - 1st 320GB one is also deemed "Healthy" because I formatted it with
> Data Lifeguard Tools, - - And the 2nd 320GB one is deemed
> "Unallocated" in the Disk Manager even though it has more than 200GB
> worth of data that i've been saving on it for years (pictures, videos
> etc...)
>
> The HD's are recognized by both, the BIOS, and the OS but for some
> reason once I re imaged my computer I am NOT able to view what is
> INSIDE the hard drive.
>
> I did not change anything between the re imaging. My operating system
> stayed the same, and my hard drives were fine before the re image.
>
> Anybody knows how to make my HD readable? Western Digital was not
> helpful with this...
>
> Thank you in advance.
>
> Senad
>

http://www.techsupportforum.com/hard...lp-please.html

EggHeadCafe - .NET Developer Portal of Choice
http://www.eggheadcafe.com/default.aspx?ref=ng

http://www.techsupportforum.com/hard...lp-please.html

EggHeadCafe - .NET Developer Portal of Choice
http://www.eggheadcafe.com/default.aspx?ref=ng

robin s wrote:
> http://www.techsupportforum.com/hard...lp-please.html
>
> EggHeadCafe - .NET Developer Portal of Choice
> http://www.eggheadcafe.com/default.aspx?ref=ng

Hi -

Nobody here is likely to know what you're talking about, and wise people do
not click links in newsgroup posts. You're likely to be perceived as a
spammer.

I suggest you use a newsreader, not a third party web forum, to access the
MS public newsgroups, and always quote the original text to which you are
replying (as well as replying in the same thread). The NNTP server name is
msnews.microsoft.com and no subscription is required.

Lanwench [MVP - Exchange] wrote:

> robin s wrote:
>> http://www.techsupportforum.com/hard...lp-please.html
>>
>> EggHeadCafe - .NET Developer Portal of Choice
>> http://www.eggheadcafe.com/default.aspx?ref=ng
>
> Hi -
>
> Nobody here is likely to know what you're talking about, and wise people do
> not click links in newsgroup posts. You're likely to be perceived as a
> spammer.
>
> I suggest you use a newsreader, not a third party web forum, to access the
> MS public newsgroups, and always quote the original text to which you are
> replying (as well as replying in the same thread). The NNTP server name is
> msnews.microsoft.com and no subscription is required.

Look at the Message-ID. Not for an NNTP server or client. Look at the
Path. Another dimemonic user spamming through their misconfigured
gateway. Best is to simply killfile all posts through there.

VanguardLH <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> Lanwench [MVP - Exchange] wrote:
>
>> robin s wrote:
>>> http://www.techsupportforum.com/hard...lp-please.html
>>>
>>> EggHeadCafe - .NET Developer Portal of Choice
>>> http://www.eggheadcafe.com/default.aspx?ref=ng
>>
>> Hi -
>>
>> Nobody here is likely to know what you're talking about, and wise
>> people do not click links in newsgroup posts. You're likely to be
>> perceived as a spammer.
>>
>> I suggest you use a newsreader, not a third party web forum, to
>> access the MS public newsgroups, and always quote the original text
>> to which you are replying (as well as replying in the same thread).
>> The NNTP server name is msnews.microsoft.com and no subscription is
>> required.
>
> Look at the Message-ID. Not for an NNTP server or client. Look at
> the Path. Another dimemonic user spamming through their misconfigured
> gateway. Best is to simply killfile all posts through there.

I've never actually understood what the "path" signified in the headers, to
be honest!