PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

2K SP4 and 48-bit LBA default

 
 
=?Utf-8?B?VG9tIE0=?=
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      7th Jun 2005
Hi there,

I've read the wealth of posts and articles about using Windows 2000 with
disks larger than 137Gb. I don't seem to be able to find a concrete answer to
this question though:

Does a clean Windows 2000 SP4 install enable 48-bit LBA by default?

For example, I have a 160Gb hard drive and a win2k cd that includes SP4.
Assuming my motherboard BIOS supports 48-bit LBA, when I install windows will
48-bit LBA be supported WITHOUT me having to do anything? (Like the registry
fix)

Thanks in advance for a definitive answer microsoft! (Or anyone else!)

Regards

Tom
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
DL
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      7th Jun 2005
yes

"Tom M" <Tom (E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:981BEB5A-417C-49F9-BE60-(E-Mail Removed)...
> Hi there,
>
> I've read the wealth of posts and articles about using Windows 2000 with
> disks larger than 137Gb. I don't seem to be able to find a concrete answer

to
> this question though:
>
> Does a clean Windows 2000 SP4 install enable 48-bit LBA by default?
>
> For example, I have a 160Gb hard drive and a win2k cd that includes SP4.
> Assuming my motherboard BIOS supports 48-bit LBA, when I install windows

will
> 48-bit LBA be supported WITHOUT me having to do anything? (Like the

registry
> fix)
>
> Thanks in advance for a definitive answer microsoft! (Or anyone else!)
>
> Regards
>
> Tom



 
Reply With Quote
 
Dave Patrick
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      7th Jun 2005
Have you verified this? AFAIK it does not. Even if you do an SP4 integrated
install the regedit is still necessary before the full drive size will be
recognized.

http://support.microsoft.com/?id=305098

--
Regards,

Dave Patrick ....Please no email replies - reply in newsgroup.
Microsoft Certified Professional
Microsoft MVP [Windows]
http://www.microsoft.com/protect

"DL" wrote:
| yes


 
Reply With Quote
 
Bob I
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      7th Jun 2005
48-Bit LBA Support for ATAPI Disk Drives in Windows 2000
http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;305098

Specifically quoted below

"Microsoft has confirmed that this is a problem in the Microsoft
products that are listed at the beginning of this article. This problem
was first corrected in Windows 2000 Service Pack 3.Important Although
support for 48-bit LBA is included in Windows 2000 Service Pack 3 (SP3)
and later, it is still necessary to create the registry change that is
described in the "Resolution" section of this article."

Tom M wrote:

> Hi there,
>
> I've read the wealth of posts and articles about using Windows 2000 with
> disks larger than 137Gb. I don't seem to be able to find a concrete answer to
> this question though:
>
> Does a clean Windows 2000 SP4 install enable 48-bit LBA by default?
>
> For example, I have a 160Gb hard drive and a win2k cd that includes SP4.
> Assuming my motherboard BIOS supports 48-bit LBA, when I install windows will
> 48-bit LBA be supported WITHOUT me having to do anything? (Like the registry
> fix)
>
> Thanks in advance for a definitive answer microsoft! (Or anyone else!)
>
> Regards
>
> Tom


 
Reply With Quote
 
=?Utf-8?B?VG9tIE0=?=
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      7th Jun 2005
Hi,

Thanks for pointing out that "Status" part Bob, I'd missed that when
trawling through everything. It does explain why I've been suffering data
loss from a drive that was preformatted and then installed using 2K without
the registry fix.

Nice gotcha!

Thanks again

Tom


 
Reply With Quote
 
Bob I
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      7th Jun 2005
You're welcome, have a pleasant day.

Tom M wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Thanks for pointing out that "Status" part Bob, I'd missed that when
> trawling through everything. It does explain why I've been suffering data
> loss from a drive that was preformatted and then installed using 2K without
> the registry fix.
>
> Nice gotcha!
>
> Thanks again
>
> Tom
>
>


 
Reply With Quote
 
DL
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      8th Jun 2005
I stand corrected

"Dave Patrick" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Have you verified this? AFAIK it does not. Even if you do an SP4

integrated
> install the regedit is still necessary before the full drive size will be
> recognized.
>
> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=305098
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Dave Patrick ....Please no email replies - reply in newsgroup.
> Microsoft Certified Professional
> Microsoft MVP [Windows]
> http://www.microsoft.com/protect
>
> "DL" wrote:
> | yes
>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Default Printer Won't Stay Default After Ending Windows Terminal Server Session awwhiskey81@yahoo.com Microsoft Windows 2000 Advanced Server 1 22nd Jan 2006 08:31 AM
How change lots of Windows default paths; how remove Wins default programs? 0-0 Wai Wai ^-^ Windows XP Setup 1 22nd Jul 2004 02:19 PM
Re: HKEY_USERS\.Default <versus> %WINDIR%\Documents and Settings\Default User\NTUSER.DAT Walter Schulz Microsoft Windows 2000 Registry 1 28th Jul 2003 09:49 AM
Re: HKEY_USERS\.Default <versus> %WINDIR%\Documents and Settings\Default User\NTUSER.DAT Walter Schulz Microsoft Windows 2000 Registry Archive 0 27th Jul 2003 04:41 PM
Re: HKEY_USERS\.Default <versus> %WINDIR%\Documents and Settings\Default User\NTUSER.DAT Dave Patrick Microsoft Windows 2000 Registry 0 27th Jul 2003 04:33 PM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:26 PM.