PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

2003 -> 2000 incompatability

 
 
Dale Fye
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      4th Mar 2008
I've got an Excel application that was written in 2003. Now I find out I
have a user that is still using 2000, and at least one segment of my 2003
code is not working. I have a routine that selects a worksheet, and sorts it
by a particular field. When this user runs this code, it bomb on the last
line of the code provided below.

Selection.Sort Key1:=Range("A2"), _
Order1:=xlAscending, _
Header:=xlYes, _
OrderCustom:=1, _
MatchCase:=False, _
Orientation:=xlTopToBottom, _
DataOption1:=xlSortNormal

I don't know whether this is because Excel 9.0 is not recognizing the
DataOption1 or the xlSortNormal, or something else in the Sort method. Would
greatly appreciate if someone could provide the correct code to run this in
Excel 9.0.

Thanks.
--
Don''t forget to rate the post if it was helpful!

email address is invalid
Please reply to newsgroup only.

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Peter T
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      4th Mar 2008
Remove arguments OrderCustom:=1 and DataOption1:=xlSortNormal which are n/a
in XL2000.

If required, you can make version specific functions by placing the code
that won't be recognized in say XL2000 in a module that will only contain
procedures that will be called in later versions.

Regards,
Peter T

"Dale Fye" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:46391028-E61D-4460-B9D8-(E-Mail Removed)...
> I've got an Excel application that was written in 2003. Now I find out I
> have a user that is still using 2000, and at least one segment of my 2003
> code is not working. I have a routine that selects a worksheet, and sorts

it
> by a particular field. When this user runs this code, it bomb on the last
> line of the code provided below.
>
> Selection.Sort Key1:=Range("A2"), _
> Order1:=xlAscending, _
> Header:=xlYes, _
> OrderCustom:=1, _
> MatchCase:=False, _
> Orientation:=xlTopToBottom, _
> DataOption1:=xlSortNormal
>
> I don't know whether this is because Excel 9.0 is not recognizing the
> DataOption1 or the xlSortNormal, or something else in the Sort method.

Would
> greatly appreciate if someone could provide the correct code to run this

in
> Excel 9.0.
>
> Thanks.
> --
> Don''t forget to rate the post if it was helpful!
>
> email address is invalid
> Please reply to newsgroup only.
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Dave Peterson
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      4th Mar 2008
DataOption# was added in xl2002. Remove that line (and the preceding line
continuation characers) and it should work in xl2k.



Dale Fye wrote:
>
> I've got an Excel application that was written in 2003. Now I find out I
> have a user that is still using 2000, and at least one segment of my 2003
> code is not working. I have a routine that selects a worksheet, and sorts it
> by a particular field. When this user runs this code, it bomb on the last
> line of the code provided below.
>
> Selection.Sort Key1:=Range("A2"), _
> Order1:=xlAscending, _
> Header:=xlYes, _
> OrderCustom:=1, _
> MatchCase:=False, _
> Orientation:=xlTopToBottom, _
> DataOption1:=xlSortNormal
>
> I don't know whether this is because Excel 9.0 is not recognizing the
> DataOption1 or the xlSortNormal, or something else in the Sort method. Would
> greatly appreciate if someone could provide the correct code to run this in
> Excel 9.0.
>
> Thanks.
> --
> Don''t forget to rate the post if it was helpful!
>
> email address is invalid
> Please reply to newsgroup only.


--

Dave Peterson
 
Reply With Quote
 
Dale Fye
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      4th Mar 2008
Thanks, Peter. I'll take a look.
--
Don''t forget to rate the post if it was helpful!

email address is invalid
Please reply to newsgroup only.



"Peter T" wrote:

> Remove arguments OrderCustom:=1 and DataOption1:=xlSortNormal which are n/a
> in XL2000.
>
> If required, you can make version specific functions by placing the code
> that won't be recognized in say XL2000 in a module that will only contain
> procedures that will be called in later versions.
>
> Regards,
> Peter T
>
> "Dale Fye" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:46391028-E61D-4460-B9D8-(E-Mail Removed)...
> > I've got an Excel application that was written in 2003. Now I find out I
> > have a user that is still using 2000, and at least one segment of my 2003
> > code is not working. I have a routine that selects a worksheet, and sorts

> it
> > by a particular field. When this user runs this code, it bomb on the last
> > line of the code provided below.
> >
> > Selection.Sort Key1:=Range("A2"), _
> > Order1:=xlAscending, _
> > Header:=xlYes, _
> > OrderCustom:=1, _
> > MatchCase:=False, _
> > Orientation:=xlTopToBottom, _
> > DataOption1:=xlSortNormal
> >
> > I don't know whether this is because Excel 9.0 is not recognizing the
> > DataOption1 or the xlSortNormal, or something else in the Sort method.

> Would
> > greatly appreciate if someone could provide the correct code to run this

> in
> > Excel 9.0.
> >
> > Thanks.
> > --
> > Don''t forget to rate the post if it was helpful!
> >
> > email address is invalid
> > Please reply to newsgroup only.
> >

>
>
>

 
Reply With Quote
 
john
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      4th Mar 2008
if it's just sort routine causing problems then you could test for excel
version - something likenot tested)

With Selection
If Val(Application.Version) < 11 Then
.Sort Key1:=Range("A2"), _
Order1:=xlAscending, _
Header:=xlYes, _
MatchCase:=False, _
Orientation:=xlTopToBottom
Else
.Sort Key1:=Range("A2"), _
Order1:=xlAscending, _
Header:=xlYes, _
OrderCustom:=1, _
MatchCase:=False, _
Orientation:=xlTopToBottom, _
DataOption1:=xlSortNormal
End If
End With
However, if more than this then follow Peter T suggestion.
--
JB


"Peter T" wrote:

> Remove arguments OrderCustom:=1 and DataOption1:=xlSortNormal which are n/a
> in XL2000.
>
> If required, you can make version specific functions by placing the code
> that won't be recognized in say XL2000 in a module that will only contain
> procedures that will be called in later versions.
>
> Regards,
> Peter T
>
> "Dale Fye" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:46391028-E61D-4460-B9D8-(E-Mail Removed)...
> > I've got an Excel application that was written in 2003. Now I find out I
> > have a user that is still using 2000, and at least one segment of my 2003
> > code is not working. I have a routine that selects a worksheet, and sorts

> it
> > by a particular field. When this user runs this code, it bomb on the last
> > line of the code provided below.
> >
> > Selection.Sort Key1:=Range("A2"), _
> > Order1:=xlAscending, _
> > Header:=xlYes, _
> > OrderCustom:=1, _
> > MatchCase:=False, _
> > Orientation:=xlTopToBottom, _
> > DataOption1:=xlSortNormal
> >
> > I don't know whether this is because Excel 9.0 is not recognizing the
> > DataOption1 or the xlSortNormal, or something else in the Sort method.

> Would
> > greatly appreciate if someone could provide the correct code to run this

> in
> > Excel 9.0.
> >
> > Thanks.
> > --
> > Don''t forget to rate the post if it was helpful!
> >
> > email address is invalid
> > Please reply to newsgroup only.
> >

>
>
>

 
Reply With Quote
 
Peter T
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      4th Mar 2008
Dave was right, only need to remove the DataOption1 argument, OrderCustom
works in XL2000 (contrary to what I had suggested)

If using the application specific If test as suggested by John, and the
module is headed Option Explicit, change xlSortNormal to its intrinsic
Constant value (in the immediate window ?xlSortNormal and hit enter)

Regards,
Peter T

"Dale Fye" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:737AAB0D-D83A-443B-8CF2-(E-Mail Removed)...
> Thanks, Peter. I'll take a look.
> --
> Don''t forget to rate the post if it was helpful!
>
> email address is invalid
> Please reply to newsgroup only.
>
>
>
> "Peter T" wrote:
>
> > Remove arguments OrderCustom:=1 and DataOption1:=xlSortNormal which are

n/a
> > in XL2000.
> >
> > If required, you can make version specific functions by placing the code
> > that won't be recognized in say XL2000 in a module that will only

contain
> > procedures that will be called in later versions.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Peter T
> >
> > "Dale Fye" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> > news:46391028-E61D-4460-B9D8-(E-Mail Removed)...
> > > I've got an Excel application that was written in 2003. Now I find

out I
> > > have a user that is still using 2000, and at least one segment of my

2003
> > > code is not working. I have a routine that selects a worksheet, and

sorts
> > it
> > > by a particular field. When this user runs this code, it bomb on the

last
> > > line of the code provided below.
> > >
> > > Selection.Sort Key1:=Range("A2"), _
> > > Order1:=xlAscending, _
> > > Header:=xlYes, _
> > > OrderCustom:=1, _
> > > MatchCase:=False, _
> > > Orientation:=xlTopToBottom, _
> > > DataOption1:=xlSortNormal
> > >
> > > I don't know whether this is because Excel 9.0 is not recognizing the
> > > DataOption1 or the xlSortNormal, or something else in the Sort method.

> > Would
> > > greatly appreciate if someone could provide the correct code to run

this
> > in
> > > Excel 9.0.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > > --
> > > Don''t forget to rate the post if it was helpful!
> > >
> > > email address is invalid
> > > Please reply to newsgroup only.
> > >

> >
> >
> >



 
Reply With Quote
 
Dave Peterson
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      4th Mar 2008
I don't think that this will compile in xl2k. That DataOption1 portion will
cause a compile error.

There are workarounds, though.

if val(application.version) < 11 then
'do the sort right here
else
'call a routine in a different module that is written for xl2002+
end if

By having the routine in a different module, xl2k won't even try to compile it.

john wrote:
>
> if it's just sort routine causing problems then you could test for excel
> version - something likenot tested)
>
> With Selection
> If Val(Application.Version) < 11 Then
> .Sort Key1:=Range("A2"), _
> Order1:=xlAscending, _
> Header:=xlYes, _
> MatchCase:=False, _
> Orientation:=xlTopToBottom
> Else
> .Sort Key1:=Range("A2"), _
> Order1:=xlAscending, _
> Header:=xlYes, _
> OrderCustom:=1, _
> MatchCase:=False, _
> Orientation:=xlTopToBottom, _
> DataOption1:=xlSortNormal
> End If
> End With
> However, if more than this then follow Peter T suggestion.
> --
> JB
>
> "Peter T" wrote:
>
> > Remove arguments OrderCustom:=1 and DataOption1:=xlSortNormal which are n/a
> > in XL2000.
> >
> > If required, you can make version specific functions by placing the code
> > that won't be recognized in say XL2000 in a module that will only contain
> > procedures that will be called in later versions.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Peter T
> >
> > "Dale Fye" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> > news:46391028-E61D-4460-B9D8-(E-Mail Removed)...
> > > I've got an Excel application that was written in 2003. Now I find out I
> > > have a user that is still using 2000, and at least one segment of my 2003
> > > code is not working. I have a routine that selects a worksheet, and sorts

> > it
> > > by a particular field. When this user runs this code, it bomb on the last
> > > line of the code provided below.
> > >
> > > Selection.Sort Key1:=Range("A2"), _
> > > Order1:=xlAscending, _
> > > Header:=xlYes, _
> > > OrderCustom:=1, _
> > > MatchCase:=False, _
> > > Orientation:=xlTopToBottom, _
> > > DataOption1:=xlSortNormal
> > >
> > > I don't know whether this is because Excel 9.0 is not recognizing the
> > > DataOption1 or the xlSortNormal, or something else in the Sort method.

> > Would
> > > greatly appreciate if someone could provide the correct code to run this

> > in
> > > Excel 9.0.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > > --
> > > Don''t forget to rate the post if it was helpful!
> > >
> > > email address is invalid
> > > Please reply to newsgroup only.
> > >

> >
> >
> >


--

Dave Peterson
 
Reply With Quote
 
Peter T
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      4th Mar 2008
Hi Dave,
Earlier I suggested pretty much the same as you as to how to cater for
multiple versions.
But somewhat to my surprise John's example does compile in my XL2k providing
xlSortNormal is changed to its appropriate number.

Regards,
Peter T



"Dave Peterson" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> I don't think that this will compile in xl2k. That DataOption1 portion

will
> cause a compile error.
>
> There are workarounds, though.
>
> if val(application.version) < 11 then
> 'do the sort right here
> else
> 'call a routine in a different module that is written for xl2002+
> end if
>
> By having the routine in a different module, xl2k won't even try to

compile it.
>
> john wrote:
> >
> > if it's just sort routine causing problems then you could test for excel
> > version - something likenot tested)
> >
> > With Selection
> > If Val(Application.Version) < 11 Then
> > .Sort Key1:=Range("A2"), _
> > Order1:=xlAscending, _
> > Header:=xlYes, _
> > MatchCase:=False, _
> > Orientation:=xlTopToBottom
> > Else
> > .Sort Key1:=Range("A2"), _
> > Order1:=xlAscending, _
> > Header:=xlYes, _
> > OrderCustom:=1, _
> > MatchCase:=False, _
> > Orientation:=xlTopToBottom, _
> > DataOption1:=xlSortNormal
> > End If
> > End With
> > However, if more than this then follow Peter T suggestion.
> > --
> > JB
> >
> > "Peter T" wrote:
> >
> > > Remove arguments OrderCustom:=1 and DataOption1:=xlSortNormal which

are n/a
> > > in XL2000.
> > >
> > > If required, you can make version specific functions by placing the

code
> > > that won't be recognized in say XL2000 in a module that will only

contain
> > > procedures that will be called in later versions.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Peter T
> > >
> > > "Dale Fye" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> > > news:46391028-E61D-4460-B9D8-(E-Mail Removed)...
> > > > I've got an Excel application that was written in 2003. Now I find

out I
> > > > have a user that is still using 2000, and at least one segment of my

2003
> > > > code is not working. I have a routine that selects a worksheet, and

sorts
> > > it
> > > > by a particular field. When this user runs this code, it bomb on

the last
> > > > line of the code provided below.
> > > >
> > > > Selection.Sort Key1:=Range("A2"), _
> > > > Order1:=xlAscending, _
> > > > Header:=xlYes, _
> > > > OrderCustom:=1, _
> > > > MatchCase:=False, _
> > > > Orientation:=xlTopToBottom, _
> > > > DataOption1:=xlSortNormal
> > > >
> > > > I don't know whether this is because Excel 9.0 is not recognizing

the
> > > > DataOption1 or the xlSortNormal, or something else in the Sort

method.
> > > Would
> > > > greatly appreciate if someone could provide the correct code to run

this
> > > in
> > > > Excel 9.0.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks.
> > > > --
> > > > Don''t forget to rate the post if it was helpful!
> > > >
> > > > email address is invalid
> > > > Please reply to newsgroup only.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >

>
> --
>
> Dave Peterson



 
Reply With Quote
 
john
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      4th Mar 2008
Hi Peter,
I had tried my suggested approach awhile ago for desktops using different
versions of Excel and much to my suprise, it worked. I think it's just one of
the Excel VBA quirks - you never know until you give it a go! However and as
I also stated, if changes required were more than just resolving sort routine
problem, Dale should follow your suggestion.
--
JB


"Peter T" wrote:

> Hi Dave,
> Earlier I suggested pretty much the same as you as to how to cater for
> multiple versions.
> But somewhat to my surprise John's example does compile in my XL2k providing
> xlSortNormal is changed to its appropriate number.
>
> Regards,
> Peter T
>
>
>
> "Dave Peterson" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> > I don't think that this will compile in xl2k. That DataOption1 portion

> will
> > cause a compile error.
> >
> > There are workarounds, though.
> >
> > if val(application.version) < 11 then
> > 'do the sort right here
> > else
> > 'call a routine in a different module that is written for xl2002+
> > end if
> >
> > By having the routine in a different module, xl2k won't even try to

> compile it.
> >
> > john wrote:
> > >
> > > if it's just sort routine causing problems then you could test for excel
> > > version - something likenot tested)
> > >
> > > With Selection
> > > If Val(Application.Version) < 11 Then
> > > .Sort Key1:=Range("A2"), _
> > > Order1:=xlAscending, _
> > > Header:=xlYes, _
> > > MatchCase:=False, _
> > > Orientation:=xlTopToBottom
> > > Else
> > > .Sort Key1:=Range("A2"), _
> > > Order1:=xlAscending, _
> > > Header:=xlYes, _
> > > OrderCustom:=1, _
> > > MatchCase:=False, _
> > > Orientation:=xlTopToBottom, _
> > > DataOption1:=xlSortNormal
> > > End If
> > > End With
> > > However, if more than this then follow Peter T suggestion.
> > > --
> > > JB
> > >
> > > "Peter T" wrote:
> > >
> > > > Remove arguments OrderCustom:=1 and DataOption1:=xlSortNormal which

> are n/a
> > > > in XL2000.
> > > >
> > > > If required, you can make version specific functions by placing the

> code
> > > > that won't be recognized in say XL2000 in a module that will only

> contain
> > > > procedures that will be called in later versions.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Peter T
> > > >
> > > > "Dale Fye" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> > > > news:46391028-E61D-4460-B9D8-(E-Mail Removed)...
> > > > > I've got an Excel application that was written in 2003. Now I find

> out I
> > > > > have a user that is still using 2000, and at least one segment of my

> 2003
> > > > > code is not working. I have a routine that selects a worksheet, and

> sorts
> > > > it
> > > > > by a particular field. When this user runs this code, it bomb on

> the last
> > > > > line of the code provided below.
> > > > >
> > > > > Selection.Sort Key1:=Range("A2"), _
> > > > > Order1:=xlAscending, _
> > > > > Header:=xlYes, _
> > > > > OrderCustom:=1, _
> > > > > MatchCase:=False, _
> > > > > Orientation:=xlTopToBottom, _
> > > > > DataOption1:=xlSortNormal
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't know whether this is because Excel 9.0 is not recognizing

> the
> > > > > DataOption1 or the xlSortNormal, or something else in the Sort

> method.
> > > > Would
> > > > > greatly appreciate if someone could provide the correct code to run

> this
> > > > in
> > > > > Excel 9.0.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > --
> > > > > Don''t forget to rate the post if it was helpful!
> > > > >
> > > > > email address is invalid
> > > > > Please reply to newsgroup only.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >

> >
> > --
> >
> > Dave Peterson

>
>
>

 
Reply With Quote
 
Peter T
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      4th Mar 2008
Did you change xlSortNormal to a number, I assume so if you had included
Option Explicit

Regards,
Peter T

"john" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:7A92FB9B-0716-4D13-9051-(E-Mail Removed)...
> Hi Peter,
> I had tried my suggested approach awhile ago for desktops using different
> versions of Excel and much to my suprise, it worked. I think it's just one

of
> the Excel VBA quirks - you never know until you give it a go! However and

as
> I also stated, if changes required were more than just resolving sort

routine
> problem, Dale should follow your suggestion.
> --
> JB
>
>
> "Peter T" wrote:
>
> > Hi Dave,
> > Earlier I suggested pretty much the same as you as to how to cater for
> > multiple versions.
> > But somewhat to my surprise John's example does compile in my XL2k

providing
> > xlSortNormal is changed to its appropriate number.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Peter T
> >
> >
> >
> > "Dave Peterson" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> > news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> > > I don't think that this will compile in xl2k. That DataOption1

portion
> > will
> > > cause a compile error.
> > >
> > > There are workarounds, though.
> > >
> > > if val(application.version) < 11 then
> > > 'do the sort right here
> > > else
> > > 'call a routine in a different module that is written for xl2002+
> > > end if
> > >
> > > By having the routine in a different module, xl2k won't even try to

> > compile it.
> > >
> > > john wrote:
> > > >
> > > > if it's just sort routine causing problems then you could test for

excel
> > > > version - something likenot tested)
> > > >
> > > > With Selection
> > > > If Val(Application.Version) < 11 Then
> > > > .Sort Key1:=Range("A2"), _
> > > > Order1:=xlAscending, _
> > > > Header:=xlYes, _
> > > > MatchCase:=False, _
> > > > Orientation:=xlTopToBottom
> > > > Else
> > > > .Sort Key1:=Range("A2"), _
> > > > Order1:=xlAscending, _
> > > > Header:=xlYes, _
> > > > OrderCustom:=1, _
> > > > MatchCase:=False, _
> > > > Orientation:=xlTopToBottom, _
> > > > DataOption1:=xlSortNormal
> > > > End If
> > > > End With
> > > > However, if more than this then follow Peter T suggestion.
> > > > --
> > > > JB
> > > >
> > > > "Peter T" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Remove arguments OrderCustom:=1 and DataOption1:=xlSortNormal

which
> > are n/a
> > > > > in XL2000.
> > > > >
> > > > > If required, you can make version specific functions by placing

the
> > code
> > > > > that won't be recognized in say XL2000 in a module that will only

> > contain
> > > > > procedures that will be called in later versions.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Peter T
> > > > >
> > > > > "Dale Fye" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> > > > > news:46391028-E61D-4460-B9D8-(E-Mail Removed)...
> > > > > > I've got an Excel application that was written in 2003. Now I

find
> > out I
> > > > > > have a user that is still using 2000, and at least one segment

of my
> > 2003
> > > > > > code is not working. I have a routine that selects a worksheet,

and
> > sorts
> > > > > it
> > > > > > by a particular field. When this user runs this code, it bomb

on
> > the last
> > > > > > line of the code provided below.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Selection.Sort Key1:=Range("A2"), _
> > > > > > Order1:=xlAscending, _
> > > > > > Header:=xlYes, _
> > > > > > OrderCustom:=1, _
> > > > > > MatchCase:=False, _
> > > > > > Orientation:=xlTopToBottom, _
> > > > > > DataOption1:=xlSortNormal
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I don't know whether this is because Excel 9.0 is not

recognizing
> > the
> > > > > > DataOption1 or the xlSortNormal, or something else in the Sort

> > method.
> > > > > Would
> > > > > > greatly appreciate if someone could provide the correct code to

run
> > this
> > > > > in
> > > > > > Excel 9.0.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Don''t forget to rate the post if it was helpful!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > email address is invalid
> > > > > > Please reply to newsgroup only.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Dave Peterson

> >
> >
> >



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
outlook 2002 and word 2000 incompatability =?Utf-8?B?VW5oYXBweSAgTWFpbCBVc2Vy?= Microsoft Outlook Discussion 1 2nd Nov 2006 08:29 PM
Access 2003 printing incompatability =?Utf-8?B?SmVhbm5pZQ==?= Microsoft Access Forms 0 12th Jul 2006 02:40 PM
outlook 2003 import export calendar file incompatability =?Utf-8?B?am9lZw==?= Microsoft Outlook Discussion 6 5th Apr 2005 06:23 PM
Office 2003 & MSN Messenger Incompatability Rich Johnson Microsoft Outlook 2 1st Feb 2004 02:49 AM
Sql Server 2000 linked server to Access 97/2000 incompatability ErickR Microsoft Access 1 18th Sep 2003 03:00 PM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:33 PM.