PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

2000 DNS and 2003 DNS

 
 
James
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      30th May 2006
Is it possible to run a W2K DNS and W2K3 DNS Server in the same AD
Domain with the DNS information stored in AD?

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Herb Martin
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      30th May 2006
James wrote:
> Is it possible to run a W2K DNS and W2K3 DNS Server in the same AD
> Domain with the DNS information stored in AD?


Yes. There are some advanced Win2003 features you cannot
use, but with only two servers these aren't important (as
far as I can recall.)

--
Herb
 
Reply With Quote
 
Kevin D. Goodknecht Sr. [MVP]
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      31st May 2006
Herb Martin wrote:
> James wrote:
>> Is it possible to run a W2K DNS and W2K3 DNS Server in the same AD
>> Domain with the DNS information stored in AD?

>
> Yes. There are some advanced Win2003 features you cannot
> use, but with only two servers these aren't important (as
> far as I can recall.)


To clarify, Win2k3 supports replication partitions that will not replicate
to Wink2. ForestDNSzones and DomainDNSZones replication partitions will only
replicate to Win2k3. A zone of the same name must use the same replication
partition on all DCs in the forest.

--
Best regards,
Kevin D. Goodknecht Sr. [MVP]
Hope This Helps
===================================
When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group"
via your newsreader so that others may learn and
benefit from your issue, to respond directly to
me remove the nospam. from my email address.
===================================
http://www.lonestaramerica.com/
http://support.wftx.us/
https://secure.lsaol.com/
===================================
Use Outlook Express?... Get OE_Quotefix:
It will strip signature out and more
http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/oe-quotefix/
===================================
Keep a back up of your OE settings and folders
with OEBackup:
http://www.oehelp.com/OEBackup/Default.aspx
===================================


 
Reply With Quote
 
Herb Martin
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      31st May 2006
Kevin D. Goodknecht Sr. [MVP] wrote:
> Herb Martin wrote:
>> James wrote:
>>> Is it possible to run a W2K DNS and W2K3 DNS Server in the same AD
>>> Domain with the DNS information stored in AD?

>> Yes. There are some advanced Win2003 features you cannot
>> use, but with only two servers these aren't important (as
>> far as I can recall.)

>
> To clarify, Win2k3 supports replication partitions that will not replicate
> to Wink2. ForestDNSzones and DomainDNSZones replication partitions will only
> replicate to Win2k3. A zone of the same name must use the same replication
> partition on all DCs in the forest.



It doesn't really "clarify" to add that in the two server
instance since replication to anything unsupported by Win2000
would make no sense -- i.e., there are NO other replication
partners.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Kevin D. Goodknecht Sr. [MVP]
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      31st May 2006
Herb Martin wrote:
> Kevin D. Goodknecht Sr. [MVP] wrote:
>> Herb Martin wrote:
>>> James wrote:
>>>> Is it possible to run a W2K DNS and W2K3 DNS Server in the same AD
>>>> Domain with the DNS information stored in AD?
>>> Yes. There are some advanced Win2003 features you cannot
>>> use, but with only two servers these aren't important (as
>>> far as I can recall.)

>>
>> To clarify, Win2k3 supports replication partitions that will not
>> replicate to Wink2. ForestDNSzones and DomainDNSZones replication
>> partitions will only replicate to Win2k3. A zone of the same name
>> must use the same replication partition on all DCs in the forest.

>
>
> It doesn't really "clarify" to add that in the two server
> instance since replication to anything unsupported by Win2000
> would make no sense -- i.e., there are NO other replication
> partners.


It would if he (James) changes the replication on the Win2k3 to one of the
replication partitions that don't exist in Win2k and he wonders why the zone
went away on the Win2k. If he then tried to re-create the zone on the Win2k,
the new zone would replicate to the Win2k3 and cause a zone conflict.

--
Best regards,
Kevin D. Goodknecht Sr. [MVP]
Hope This Helps
===================================
When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group"
via your newsreader so that others may learn and
benefit from your issue, to respond directly to
me remove the nospam. from my email address.
===================================
http://www.lonestaramerica.com/
http://support.wftx.us/
https://secure.lsaol.com/
===================================
Use Outlook Express?... Get OE_Quotefix:
It will strip signature out and more
http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/oe-quotefix/
===================================
Keep a back up of your OE settings and folders
with OEBackup:
http://www.oehelp.com/OEBackup/Default.aspx
===================================


 
Reply With Quote
 
Ace Fekay [MVP]
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      1st Jun 2006
In news:(E-Mail Removed),
Kevin D. Goodknecht Sr. [MVP] <(E-Mail Removed)> stated, which I
commented on below:

> It would if he (James) changes the replication on the Win2k3 to one
> of the replication partitions that don't exist in Win2k and he
> wonders why the zone went away on the Win2k. If he then tried to
> re-create the zone on the Win2k, the new zone would replicate to the
> Win2k3 and cause a zone conflict.


I must second that notion about conflicts. All too often I see this in a
mixed 2000/2003 environment when an admin doesn't understand the replication
scopes offered in 2003 with respect to the app partitions compared to 2000's
inability to use them. My recommendation in a mixed scenario, unless an
admin fully understands the app partition replication scopes, is to watch
which partition to use, or even better, do not use a 2000 DNS server and
stick with all 2003 DNS so the conflict problem doesn't occur.


--
Ace

This posting is provided "AS-IS" with no warranties or guarantees and
confers no rights.

Having difficulty reading or finding responses to your post?
Instead of the website you're using, I suggest to use OEx (Outlook Express
or any other newsreader), and configure a news account, pointing to
news.microsoft.com. This is a direct link to the Microsoft Public
Newsgroups. It is FREE and requires NO ISP's Usenet account. OEx allows you
to easily find, track threads, cross-post, sort by date, poster's name,
watched threads or subject.

It's easy:
How to Configure OEx for Internet News
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=171164

Ace Fekay, MCSE 2003 & 2000, MCSA 2003 & 2000, MCSE+I, MCT, MVP
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
Microsoft Certified Trainer

Infinite Diversities in Infinite Combinations
Assimilation Imminent. Resistance is Futile
"Very funny Scotty. Now, beam down my clothes."

The only thing in life is change. Anything more is a blackhole consuming
unnecessary energy. - [Me]




 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Outlook ugrade 2000 to 2003: items from 2000 does not sync to PPC =?Utf-8?B?TGFyc0Y=?= Microsoft Outlook Installation 2 3rd Apr 2006 10:53 AM
Office 2000 & 2003 MUIs with Frontpage 2000/2003. =?Utf-8?B?SmltIEJ1ZA==?= Microsoft Frontpage 2 4th Aug 2005 03:10 PM
Outlook 2000 & 2003 Cannot Print 2003 Calendar from PC with Office 2000 Mike Microsoft Outlook Discussion 5 18th Aug 2004 05:16 AM
Exchange 2000 and 2003 running in a Windows 2000 Server Environmen =?Utf-8?B?Sm9obg==?= Microsoft Windows 2000 Active Directory 2 7th Jul 2004 09:09 PM
Active Directory 2000 to 2003 Update (With Exchange 2000 installed) Javier Villegas Microsoft Windows 2000 2 24th Apr 2004 07:34 PM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:06 PM.