20 Anti-Spyware programs Tested

Spybot S&D, did not do very well unfortunately. (40 from 134)
Ad-aware SE, did better. (82 from 134)

check it out here...

http://spywarewarrior.com/asw-test-guide.htm

regards
stan


-
Wise men talk because they have something to say,
fools talk because they have to say something.

stan wrote:
> 20 Anti-Spyware programs Tested
>
> Spybot S&D, did not do very well unfortunately. (40 from 134)
> Ad-aware SE, did better. (82 from 134)
>
> check it out here...
>
> http://spywarewarrior.com/asw-test-guide.htm
>
> regards
> stan
>
>
> -
> Wise men talk because they have something to say,
> fools talk because they have to say something.


quote:

"The test results reported here constitute but a one test with a single
collection of spyware and adware programs. The anti-spyware scanners
tested here may perform differently with other collections of spyware
and adware."

Personally I use Spybot and AdAware with my clients, then load a
firewall to watch which programs still try and access the internet..and
rip them out by the roots.

Cheers!

Son Of Spy
--

Some You Won't Find Anywhere Else...
http://sonofspy3.spymac.net/index.html
http://www.sover.net/~wysiwygx/index.html

. --- . . - - - - - - - - - - - -
/ SOS \ __ / Freeware - - - - - -
/ / \ ( ) / - - - - -
/ / / / / / / \/ \ - - - -
/ / / / / / / : : - - -
/ / / / / ' ' - -
/ / //..\\
=====UU==UU=====
'///||\\\'
' '' '

In article <30n9d.2799$(E-Mail Removed)>,
(E-Mail Removed), Son Of Spy says...
> stan wrote:
> > 20 Anti-Spyware programs Tested
> >
> > Spybot S&D, did not do very well unfortunately. (40 from 134)
> > Ad-aware SE, did better. (82 from 134)
> >
> > check it out here...
> >
> > http://spywarewarrior.com/asw-test-guide.htm
> >
> > regards
> > stan
>
> quote:
>
> "The test results reported here constitute but a one test with a single
> collection of spyware and adware programs. The anti-spyware scanners
> tested here may perform differently with other collections of spyware
> and adware."
>
> Personally I use Spybot and AdAware with my clients, then load a
> firewall to watch which programs still try and access the internet..and
> rip them out by the roots.
>
> Cheers!
>
> Son Of Spy
>
hi SOS

yes, basically, its just a standard disclaimer.

and I also use both products and a firewall.

On another topic im not happy with the appearance of your site SOS,
the content is great, but the design has always gone from poor to worse,
you just need to look at the top freeware and shareware sites and look
at how their designed for choosing software...here is a front page
design that would suit your site perfectly,
http://www.freewarefiles.com/
this design is close to perfection.. you must look closely
at the features its all there. make something similar to this,
but dont despair SOS because the pricelesswarehome site is a
complete joke its 10x worse than yours and I am an expert in this subject.
if only susan (bug-her) would understand how pathetic her site is,
instead of sabotaging any attempt to improve her site.

and SOS (I cant enter your site, my security settings) and most others
that have high security wont either...important get rid of the javascript,
you dont need it.

I wont charge you for this advice,
just dont be cruel to animals.

regards
stan the logical one

On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 18:04:55 +1000, in alt.comp.freeware, stan <(E-Mail Removed)>,
by way of Message-id <(E-Mail Removed)>, wrote:

>In article <30n9d.2799$(E-Mail Removed)>,
>(E-Mail Removed), Son Of Spy says...
>> stan wrote:
>> > 20 Anti-Spyware programs Tested
>> >
>> > Spybot S&D, did not do very well unfortunately. (40 from 134)
>> > Ad-aware SE, did better. (82 from 134)
>> >
>> > check it out here...
>> >
>> > http://spywarewarrior.com/asw-test-guide.htm
>> >
>> > regards
>> > stan
>>
>> quote:
>>
>> "The test results reported here constitute but a one test with a single
>> collection of spyware and adware programs. The anti-spyware scanners
>> tested here may perform differently with other collections of spyware
>> and adware."
>>
>> Personally I use Spybot and AdAware with my clients, then load a
>> firewall to watch which programs still try and access the internet..and
>> rip them out by the roots.
>>
>> Cheers!
>>
>> Son Of Spy
>>
>hi SOS
>
>yes, basically, its just a standard disclaimer.
>
> and I also use both products and a firewall.
>
>On another topic im not happy with the appearance of your site SOS,
>the content is great, but the design has always gone from poor to worse,
>you just need to look at the top freeware and shareware sites and look
>at how their designed for choosing software...here is a front page
>design that would suit your site perfectly,
>http://www.freewarefiles.com/
>this design is close to perfection..

Right.... including the multi "subject" advert banner, located slightly above
the screen's midland.
If that's perfection, what's it say about the site's author?

>you must look closely
>at the features its all there. make something similar to this,
>but dont despair SOS because the pricelesswarehome site is a
>complete joke its 10x worse than yours and I am an expert in this subject.
>if only susan (bug-her) would understand how pathetic her site is,
>instead of sabotaging any attempt to improve her site.
>
>and SOS (I cant enter your site, my security settings) and most others
>that have high security wont either...important get rid of the javascript,
>you dont need it.
>
>I wont charge you for this advice,
>just dont be cruel to animals.
>
>regards
> stan the logical one

In article <(E-Mail Removed)>,
(E-Mail Removed), Vrodok the Repentant says...

>
> Right.... including the multi "subject" advert banner, located slightly above
> the screen's midland.
> If that's perfection, what's it say about the site's author?
>

I'm not affiliated with that site it was just a good design example
I chose for SOS, but the author deserves a web design Award!

and SOS naturally would remove the adspace because he dont need it.



regards
stan the logical one