PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

2 XP installations and invisible drives???

 
 
Joker
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      26th Sep 2003
Hi,

does anybody know how to install two different installations of WinXP (one
on C: and one on E: ?) and how to make these two drives (C: and E
invisible / unaccessible from the other installation. I'd like to have one
work-environment with firewalls etc. and one for gaming on-line and stuff
like that without the firewall and virus scanners. These two partitions must
not see each other at any time for security reasons. Is this possible and if
it is, how do I set it up?

regards,

Joker


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
I'm Dan
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      27th Sep 2003

"Joker" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> does anybody know how to install two different installations of WinXP

(one
> on C: and one on E: ?) and how to make these two drives (C: and E
> invisible / unaccessible from the other installation. I'd like to have

one
> work-environment with firewalls etc. and one for gaming on-line and

stuff
> like that without the firewall and virus scanners. These two

partitions must
> not see each other at any time for security reasons. Is this possible

and if
> it is, how do I set it up?


This is easy to do with a third-party boot manager. See if my page at
www.goodells.net/multiboot helps you understand the process. Every
machine in my house multiboots, even the kids' machines are dualbooting
for just the purpose you're looking at -- one partition (called
"Trusted" on the boot menus) for normal use, complete with access to
files and printers on the home lan, and another partition (called
"Untrusted") for games, kazaa, and the like, with internet access but
locked out of the home lan. The Untrusted partition periodically gets
refreshed from a DriveImage backup of the virgin Untrusted partition,
just to get rid of the garbage that periodically accumulates there.



 
Reply With Quote
 
peter gardner
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      27th Sep 2003
This does not work if you have two copies of XP in two
separate bootable partitions managed by (e.g.) bootmagic.
The problem is that XP is bright enough (? joke ?) to look
for other partitions whether in extended partitions or
not, and it appears to replicate some? registry
information into the the other partitions.

I created two XP boot partitions successfully for similar
reasons to Joker - mine was that I need a stripped down
version for video editing (so that there was minimal
background activities) and a full version with all my apps
on - but I found that information about the DVD drives was
being modified in the stripped version's registry when I
made changes to the DVD handlers in the full version.

I used Partitionmagic 7 (make sure you have rev 303) to
create an NTFS partition, made it active and then
installed XP on it. Once I had fully configured just the
basic XP and activated it, I used Partitionmagic again to
make a copy into a separate partition. So far all well,
and both partitions booted fine. I then loaded my video
software onto one XP (stripped version) and it all worked
fine. I then loaded all the rest of my software including
Nero 6 onto my full version, and this is where the problem
started. Both booted OK, but the installation of Nero
resulted in registry changes being made that stopped the
stripped one from working. The issue is variously
highlighted in articles in MS knowledgebase and Pinnacle
knowledgebase if you search for lowerfilter or
upperfilter. I have never been able to get the video
stuff working again.

Going back to Joker's issue, then I also require that the
two partitions are TOTALLY isolated from each other. He
needs it for "security reasons".

What is even more scary is that when I screwed up the
registry on one copy so that it would no longer boot, I
thought to myself, no worries I can boot up off the second
copy. But the same registry error has been replicated
there, so I now have a totally dead machine.

Before I rebuild - does anyone have an insight into this
problem, and able to tell me how to keep all copies of XP
immune from each other!



>-----Original Message-----
>
>"Joker" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>> does anybody know how to install two different

installations of WinXP
>(one
>> on C: and one on E: ?) and how to make these two drives

(C: and E
>> invisible / unaccessible from the other installation.

I'd like to have
>one
>> work-environment with firewalls etc. and one for gaming

on-line and
>stuff
>> like that without the firewall and virus scanners.

These two
>partitions must
>> not see each other at any time for security reasons. Is

this possible
>and if
>> it is, how do I set it up?

>
>This is easy to do with a third-party boot manager. See

if my page at
>www.goodells.net/multiboot helps you understand the

process. Every
>machine in my house multiboots, even the kids' machines

are dualbooting
>for just the purpose you're looking at -- one partition

(called
>"Trusted" on the boot menus) for normal use, complete

with access to
>files and printers on the home lan, and another partition

(called
>"Untrusted") for games, kazaa, and the like, with

internet access but
>locked out of the home lan. The Untrusted partition

periodically gets
>refreshed from a DriveImage backup of the virgin

Untrusted partition,
>just to get rid of the garbage that periodically

accumulates there.
>
>
>
>.
>

 
Reply With Quote
 
donqujjote
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      27th Sep 2003
So it seems that this thing is harder to do than it should. If it's possible
at all... My "security reasons" are that I don't want to get viruses /
trojans into the company system, but I would like to use the laptop for more
"fun stuff" from home. That is why I require the systems to be completely
invisible to each other. This is certainly not the first time some microsoft
application would outsmart itself by "knowing what you want" and messing
itself up completely. But let us not be pessimistic and let's hope someone
out there has the solution to this problem.

In the mean time I will try "I'm Dan":s sollution. It can take a while
before I can present any results since I am in the middle of a busy period
doing other things.

/joker


"peter gardner" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:18d501c384e1$16593940$(E-Mail Removed)...
> This does not work if you have two copies of XP in two
> separate bootable partitions managed by (e.g.) bootmagic.
> The problem is that XP is bright enough (? joke ?) to look
> for other partitions whether in extended partitions or
> not, and it appears to replicate some? registry
> information into the the other partitions.
>
> I created two XP boot partitions successfully for similar
> reasons to Joker - mine was that I need a stripped down
> version for video editing (so that there was minimal
> background activities) and a full version with all my apps
> on - but I found that information about the DVD drives was
> being modified in the stripped version's registry when I
> made changes to the DVD handlers in the full version.
>
> I used Partitionmagic 7 (make sure you have rev 303) to
> create an NTFS partition, made it active and then
> installed XP on it. Once I had fully configured just the
> basic XP and activated it, I used Partitionmagic again to
> make a copy into a separate partition. So far all well,
> and both partitions booted fine. I then loaded my video
> software onto one XP (stripped version) and it all worked
> fine. I then loaded all the rest of my software including
> Nero 6 onto my full version, and this is where the problem
> started. Both booted OK, but the installation of Nero
> resulted in registry changes being made that stopped the
> stripped one from working. The issue is variously
> highlighted in articles in MS knowledgebase and Pinnacle
> knowledgebase if you search for lowerfilter or
> upperfilter. I have never been able to get the video
> stuff working again.
>
> Going back to Joker's issue, then I also require that the
> two partitions are TOTALLY isolated from each other. He
> needs it for "security reasons".
>
> What is even more scary is that when I screwed up the
> registry on one copy so that it would no longer boot, I
> thought to myself, no worries I can boot up off the second
> copy. But the same registry error has been replicated
> there, so I now have a totally dead machine.
>
> Before I rebuild - does anyone have an insight into this
> problem, and able to tell me how to keep all copies of XP
> immune from each other!
>
>
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >
> >"Joker" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> >> does anybody know how to install two different

> installations of WinXP
> >(one
> >> on C: and one on E: ?) and how to make these two drives

> (C: and E
> >> invisible / unaccessible from the other installation.

> I'd like to have
> >one
> >> work-environment with firewalls etc. and one for gaming

> on-line and
> >stuff
> >> like that without the firewall and virus scanners.

> These two
> >partitions must
> >> not see each other at any time for security reasons. Is

> this possible
> >and if
> >> it is, how do I set it up?

> >
> >This is easy to do with a third-party boot manager. See

> if my page at
> >www.goodells.net/multiboot helps you understand the

> process. Every
> >machine in my house multiboots, even the kids' machines

> are dualbooting
> >for just the purpose you're looking at -- one partition

> (called
> >"Trusted" on the boot menus) for normal use, complete

> with access to
> >files and printers on the home lan, and another partition

> (called
> >"Untrusted") for games, kazaa, and the like, with

> internet access but
> >locked out of the home lan. The Untrusted partition

> periodically gets
> >refreshed from a DriveImage backup of the virgin

> Untrusted partition,
> >just to get rid of the garbage that periodically

> accumulates there.
> >
> >
> >
> >.
> >



 
Reply With Quote
 
I'm Dan
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      27th Sep 2003

"peter gardner" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> I created two XP boot partitions successfully for similar
> reasons to Joker - mine was that I need a stripped down
> version for video editing (so that there was minimal
> background activities) and a full version with all my apps
> on - but I found that information about the DVD drives was
> being modified in the stripped version's registry when I
> made changes to the DVD handlers in the full version.
>
> I used Partitionmagic 7 (make sure you have rev 303) to
> create an NTFS partition, made it active and then
> installed XP on it. Once I had fully configured just the
> basic XP and activated it, I used Partitionmagic again to
> make a copy into a separate partition. So far all well,
> and both partitions booted fine.
> ...(snipped)...
> ... when I screwed up the registry on one copy so that
> it would no longer boot, I thought to myself, no worries
> I can boot up off the second copy. But the same
> registry error has been replicated there, so I now have
> a totally dead machine.
>
> Before I rebuild - does anyone have an insight into this
> problem, and able to tell me how to keep all copies of XP
> immune from each other!


It wasn't replicating registry entries in the alternate registry, you
were actually using the same single registry under both boot options.
There are a couple "features" of XP that can trip you up, regardless of
whether you use PartitionMagic, BootIt, Ghost, DriveImage, or anything
else. Almost everyone who complains that such-and-such copy/clone
utility didn't work is being tripped up by XP, not by the utility. One
issue is that the NT-family OS's use a boot.ini file in the active
startup partition that must point to the partition where XP is running
from. The other issue is that NT-family OS's "remember" drive letters
by recording the "signatures" of the corresponding partitions in the XP
registry. For all the gory details of what is going on, see my webpage
at www.goodells.net/multiboot.

In your case, starting from scratch you would use PartitionMagic to
create an active bootable NTFS partition and install XP1.

Now we need to force XP to forget the remembered drive letters and
partition signatures before we clone it. Boot into XP1 and run regedit
from the Start|Run menu. Navigate to the registry key
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\MountedDevices]. Delete all the
"\??\Volume{...}" and "\DosDevices\..." entries, leaving just the key
and "Default" entry. (XP will rebuild this table the next time it
boots.)

Now shut down and run PM from outside Windows (from CD or PM's "rescue
floppies") -- do not boot back into XP1 because we don't want it to
rebuild the registry key yet. Using PM, copy part.1 to part.2, set
part.2 active and part.1 hidden. Now reboot and part.2 should boot and
rebuild the partition signatures in its registry.

At this point, you should have two completely independent installations,
one active and the other hidden. To toggle the active/hidden status,
run PM from CD or floppy and flip back and forth between each partition.
Alternately activate each partition and reboot into it to check that
each XP is working properly. Give each partition a different volume
label (such as "XP1" and "XP2") to help keep track of which is which.
Look in XP's Disk Management service and although it will "see" both
partitions, only one should have a drive letter. You should see
something similar to:
XPA (C NTFS Healthy (System)
XPB NTFS Healthy (Unknown Partition)
Depending on which partition you've activated, one or the other will be
C: and the other will be a "Unknown Partition". To confirm you're using
different registries, change the desktop wallpaper and confirm the
change does not carry over to the other installation. Look at each
partition's boot.ini file and they should be using different ARCpaths --
e.g., "multi(0)disk(0)rdisk(0)partition(1)" vs
"multi(0)disk(0)rdisk(0)partition(2)".

If all is well, you can install BootMagic. (I don't use BM, but I
thought it wouldn't install on a NTFS partition. Since you didn't seem
to have trouble with it, I'll assume you don't need help with BM.)



 
Reply With Quote
 
peter gardner
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      27th Sep 2003
Thanks for this, I'll give it a try.

I actually have a small dos partition in which I run
bootmagic plus a few "rescue" utilities just in case.
With the "reliability" of windows, I rarely need such belt
and braces!!!

:-)


>-----Original Message-----
>
>"peter gardner" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>> I created two XP boot partitions successfully for

similar
>> reasons to Joker - mine was that I need a stripped down
>> version for video editing (so that there was minimal
>> background activities) and a full version with all my

apps
>> on - but I found that information about the DVD drives

was
>> being modified in the stripped version's registry when I
>> made changes to the DVD handlers in the full version.
>>
>> I used Partitionmagic 7 (make sure you have rev 303) to
>> create an NTFS partition, made it active and then
>> installed XP on it. Once I had fully configured just

the
>> basic XP and activated it, I used Partitionmagic again

to
>> make a copy into a separate partition. So far all well,
>> and both partitions booted fine.
>> ...(snipped)...
>> ... when I screwed up the registry on one copy so that
>> it would no longer boot, I thought to myself, no worries
>> I can boot up off the second copy. But the same
>> registry error has been replicated there, so I now have
>> a totally dead machine.
>>
>> Before I rebuild - does anyone have an insight into this
>> problem, and able to tell me how to keep all copies of

XP
>> immune from each other!

>
>It wasn't replicating registry entries in the alternate

registry, you
>were actually using the same single registry under both

boot options.
>There are a couple "features" of XP that can trip you up,

regardless of
>whether you use PartitionMagic, BootIt, Ghost,

DriveImage, or anything
>else. Almost everyone who complains that such-and-such

copy/clone
>utility didn't work is being tripped up by XP, not by the

utility. One
>issue is that the NT-family OS's use a boot.ini file in

the active
>startup partition that must point to the partition where

XP is running
>from. The other issue is that NT-family OS's "remember"

drive letters
>by recording the "signatures" of the corresponding

partitions in the XP
>registry. For all the gory details of what is going on,

see my webpage
>at www.goodells.net/multiboot.
>
>In your case, starting from scratch you would use

PartitionMagic to
>create an active bootable NTFS partition and install XP1.
>
>Now we need to force XP to forget the remembered drive

letters and
>partition signatures before we clone it. Boot into XP1

and run regedit
>from the Start|Run menu. Navigate to the registry key
>[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\MountedDevices]. Delete all

the
>"\??\Volume{...}" and "\DosDevices\..." entries, leaving

just the key
>and "Default" entry. (XP will rebuild this table the

next time it
>boots.)
>
>Now shut down and run PM from outside Windows (from CD or

PM's "rescue
>floppies") -- do not boot back into XP1 because we don't

want it to
>rebuild the registry key yet. Using PM, copy part.1 to

part.2, set
>part.2 active and part.1 hidden. Now reboot and part.2

should boot and
>rebuild the partition signatures in its registry.
>
>At this point, you should have two completely independent

installations,
>one active and the other hidden. To toggle the

active/hidden status,
>run PM from CD or floppy and flip back and forth between

each partition.
>Alternately activate each partition and reboot into it to

check that
>each XP is working properly. Give each partition a

different volume
>label (such as "XP1" and "XP2") to help keep track of

which is which.
>Look in XP's Disk Management service and although it

will "see" both
>partitions, only one should have a drive letter. You

should see
>something similar to:
> XPA (C NTFS Healthy (System)
> XPB NTFS Healthy (Unknown Partition)
>Depending on which partition you've activated, one or the

other will be
>C: and the other will be a "Unknown Partition". To

confirm you're using
>different registries, change the desktop wallpaper and

confirm the
>change does not carry over to the other installation.

Look at each
>partition's boot.ini file and they should be using

different ARCpaths --
>e.g., "multi(0)disk(0)rdisk(0)partition(1)" vs
>"multi(0)disk(0)rdisk(0)partition(2)".
>
>If all is well, you can install BootMagic. (I don't use

BM, but I
>thought it wouldn't install on a NTFS partition. Since

you didn't seem
>to have trouble with it, I'll assume you don't need help

with BM.)
>
>
>
>.
>

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Make drives invisible Kev Windows XP Configuration 0 27th Mar 2006 01:34 PM
invisible hard drives =?Utf-8?B?amZhYg==?= Windows XP Setup 4 3rd Jun 2005 03:25 PM
drives sometimes invisible peter Windows XP Help 0 20th Nov 2003 06:09 AM
drives sometimes invisible peter Windows XP Help 0 19th Nov 2003 06:50 AM
Re: Invisible Drives peter Windows XP Help 0 27th Oct 2003 06:18 AM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:19 PM.