PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

>2 GB OST limit in OL2K vs. OL2K3

 
 
Robert Gordon
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      11th Jan 2004
I have been told that the 2 GB local cached limit has been eliminated in
Outlook 2003.

However, does this only apply to a local cached copy created from scratch
by
Outlook 2003, rather than an upgrade of Outlook 2003 over an older install
of
Outlook 2000 which already has created a .ost file?

The reason I ask is that I've noticed some of my Outlook 2003 client
receiving the
"offline file can't be >2 GB" error message, and the common factor is that
all those
clients were done as in place upgrades to OL2K3, over Outlook 2000 which
was
already set up for offline Send/Receive syncing, rather than being done as
a fresh
install with no .ost files previously existing.

Comments?



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Sue Mosher [MVP]
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      11th Jan 2004
It applies to .pst and .ost files created in Outlook 2003. Existing files
are not converted to the new format.
--
Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP
Author of
Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for
Administrators, Power Users, and Developers
http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx


"Robert Gordon" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> I have been told that the 2 GB local cached limit has been eliminated in
> Outlook 2003.
>
> However, does this only apply to a local cached copy created from scratch
> by
> Outlook 2003, rather than an upgrade of Outlook 2003 over an older

install
> of
> Outlook 2000 which already has created a .ost file?
>
> The reason I ask is that I've noticed some of my Outlook 2003 client
> receiving the
> "offline file can't be >2 GB" error message, and the common factor is that
> all those
> clients were done as in place upgrades to OL2K3, over Outlook 2000 which
> was
> already set up for offline Send/Receive syncing, rather than being done

as
> a fresh
> install with no .ost files previously existing.
>
> Comments?
>
>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
K. Ramaswamy
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      12th Jan 2004
Is there a means of upgrading the existing file to the new format?

K. Ramaswamy

"Sue Mosher [MVP]" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> It applies to .pst and .ost files created in Outlook 2003. Existing files
> are not converted to the new format.
> --
> Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP
> Author of
> Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for
> Administrators, Power Users, and Developers
> http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx
>
>
> "Robert Gordon" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> > I have been told that the 2 GB local cached limit has been eliminated in
> > Outlook 2003.
> >
> > However, does this only apply to a local cached copy created from

scratch
> > by
> > Outlook 2003, rather than an upgrade of Outlook 2003 over an older

> install
> > of
> > Outlook 2000 which already has created a .ost file?
> >
> > The reason I ask is that I've noticed some of my Outlook 2003 client
> > receiving the
> > "offline file can't be >2 GB" error message, and the common factor is

that
> > all those
> > clients were done as in place upgrades to OL2K3, over Outlook 2000

which
> > was
> > already set up for offline Send/Receive syncing, rather than being done

> as
> > a fresh
> > install with no .ost files previously existing.
> >
> > Comments?
> >
> >
> >

>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Ivan Bútora
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      12th Jan 2004
Manually - create a file in the new format, and then copy what you want into it.



"K. Ramaswamy" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:e8GmF$(E-Mail Removed)...
Is there a means of upgrading the existing file to the new format?

K. Ramaswamy

"Sue Mosher [MVP]" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> It applies to .pst and .ost files created in Outlook 2003. Existing files
> are not converted to the new format.
> --
> Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP
> Author of
> Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for
> Administrators, Power Users, and Developers
> http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx
>
>
> "Robert Gordon" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> > I have been told that the 2 GB local cached limit has been eliminated in
> > Outlook 2003.
> >
> > However, does this only apply to a local cached copy created from

scratch
> > by
> > Outlook 2003, rather than an upgrade of Outlook 2003 over an older

> install
> > of
> > Outlook 2000 which already has created a .ost file?
> >
> > The reason I ask is that I've noticed some of my Outlook 2003 client
> > receiving the
> > "offline file can't be >2 GB" error message, and the common factor is

that
> > all those
> > clients were done as in place upgrades to OL2K3, over Outlook 2000

which
> > was
> > already set up for offline Send/Receive syncing, rather than being done

> as
> > a fresh
> > install with no .ost files previously existing.
> >
> > Comments?
> >
> >
> >

>
>




 
Reply With Quote
 
Roady
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      12th Jan 2004
Also note that Exchange 5.5 doesn't support UNICODE and therefore can't
create pst-files bigger than 2GB even when you have Outlook 2003.

--
Roady
www.sparnaaij.net
Microsoft Office and Microsoft Office related News
Also Outlook FAQ, How To's, Downloads and more...

Questions of the month:
-Color Code Your E-Mail Advanced
-Add Sound To Your E-mail

Subscribe to the newsletter to receive news and tips & tricks in your
mailbox!
www.sparnaaij.net

-----
"Sue Mosher [MVP]" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> It applies to .pst and .ost files created in Outlook 2003. Existing files
> are not converted to the new format.
> --
> Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP
> Author of
> Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for
> Administrators, Power Users, and Developers
> http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx
>
>
> "Robert Gordon" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> > I have been told that the 2 GB local cached limit has been eliminated in
> > Outlook 2003.
> >
> > However, does this only apply to a local cached copy created from

scratch
> > by
> > Outlook 2003, rather than an upgrade of Outlook 2003 over an older

> install
> > of
> > Outlook 2000 which already has created a .ost file?
> >
> > The reason I ask is that I've noticed some of my Outlook 2003 client
> > receiving the
> > "offline file can't be >2 GB" error message, and the common factor is

that
> > all those
> > clients were done as in place upgrades to OL2K3, over Outlook 2000

which
> > was
> > already set up for offline Send/Receive syncing, rather than being done

> as
> > a fresh
> > install with no .ost files previously existing.
> >
> > Comments?
> >
> >
> >

>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Sue Mosher [MVP]
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      12th Jan 2004
Since Exchange doesn't create the files, Outlook does, I'm not sure that's
relevant. You can certainly have a Unicode-capable file with no
Unicode-specific data in it.

--
Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP
Author of
Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for
Administrators, Power Users, and Developers
http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx

"Roady" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Also note that Exchange 5.5 doesn't support UNICODE and therefore can't
> create pst-files bigger than 2GB even when you have Outlook 2003.


>
> -----
> "Sue Mosher [MVP]" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> > It applies to .pst and .ost files created in Outlook 2003. Existing

files
> > are not converted to the new format.


> >
> > "Robert Gordon" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> > news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> > > I have been told that the 2 GB local cached limit has been eliminated

in
> > > Outlook 2003.
> > >
> > > However, does this only apply to a local cached copy created from

> scratch
> > > by
> > > Outlook 2003, rather than an upgrade of Outlook 2003 over an older

> > install
> > > of
> > > Outlook 2000 which already has created a .ost file?
> > >
> > > The reason I ask is that I've noticed some of my Outlook 2003 client
> > > receiving the
> > > "offline file can't be >2 GB" error message, and the common factor is

> that
> > > all those
> > > clients were done as in place upgrades to OL2K3, over Outlook 2000

> which
> > > was
> > > already set up for offline Send/Receive syncing, rather than being

done
> > as
> > > a fresh
> > > install with no .ost files previously existing.
> > >
> > > Comments?
> > >
> > >
> > >

> >
> >

>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Roady
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      12th Jan 2004
According to Diane the size of the ost (or pst) is controlled by the file
format which is
controlled by the server - exchange 5.5 only uses ansi versions, not
Unicode.

--
Roady
www.sparnaaij.net
Microsoft Office and Microsoft Office related News
Also Outlook FAQ, How To's, Downloads and more...

Questions of the month:
-Color Code Your E-Mail Advanced
-Add Sound To Your E-mail

Subscribe to the newsletter to receive news and tips & tricks in your
mailbox!
www.sparnaaij.net

-----
"Sue Mosher [MVP]" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:eqri$(E-Mail Removed)...
> Since Exchange doesn't create the files, Outlook does, I'm not sure that's
> relevant. You can certainly have a Unicode-capable file with no
> Unicode-specific data in it.
>
> --
> Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP
> Author of
> Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for
> Administrators, Power Users, and Developers
> http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx
>
> "Roady" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> > Also note that Exchange 5.5 doesn't support UNICODE and therefore can't
> > create pst-files bigger than 2GB even when you have Outlook 2003.

>
> >
> > -----
> > "Sue Mosher [MVP]" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> > news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> > > It applies to .pst and .ost files created in Outlook 2003. Existing

> files
> > > are not converted to the new format.

>
> > >
> > > "Robert Gordon" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> > > news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> > > > I have been told that the 2 GB local cached limit has been

eliminated
> in
> > > > Outlook 2003.
> > > >
> > > > However, does this only apply to a local cached copy created from

> > scratch
> > > > by
> > > > Outlook 2003, rather than an upgrade of Outlook 2003 over an older
> > > install
> > > > of
> > > > Outlook 2000 which already has created a .ost file?
> > > >
> > > > The reason I ask is that I've noticed some of my Outlook 2003

client
> > > > receiving the
> > > > "offline file can't be >2 GB" error message, and the common factor

is
> > that
> > > > all those
> > > > clients were done as in place upgrades to OL2K3, over Outlook 2000

> > which
> > > > was
> > > > already set up for offline Send/Receive syncing, rather than being

> done
> > > as
> > > > a fresh
> > > > install with no .ost files previously existing.
> > > >
> > > > Comments?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >

> >
> >

>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Roady
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      12th Jan 2004
Forgot to add;
This was in a discussion where a user tried to create an ost-file bigger
than 2GB with Outlook 2003 and Exchange 5.5.
I first suggested to delete the original ost-file so it got rebuild and
later to recreate the mail profile; neither worked.

Diane then came with the remark that a Exchange 5.5 would be the case.
I have to admit that I haven't tested it myself.

--
Roady
www.sparnaaij.net
Microsoft Office and Microsoft Office related News
Also Outlook FAQ, How To's, Downloads and more...

Questions of the month:
-Color Code Your E-Mail Advanced
-Add Sound To Your E-mail

Subscribe to the newsletter to receive news and tips & tricks in your
mailbox!
www.sparnaaij.net

-----
"Roady" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> According to Diane the size of the ost (or pst) is controlled by the file
> format which is
> controlled by the server - exchange 5.5 only uses ansi versions, not
> Unicode.
>
> --
> Roady
> www.sparnaaij.net
> Microsoft Office and Microsoft Office related News
> Also Outlook FAQ, How To's, Downloads and more...
>
> Questions of the month:
> -Color Code Your E-Mail Advanced
> -Add Sound To Your E-mail
>
> Subscribe to the newsletter to receive news and tips & tricks in your
> mailbox!
> www.sparnaaij.net
>
> -----
> "Sue Mosher [MVP]" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:eqri$(E-Mail Removed)...
> > Since Exchange doesn't create the files, Outlook does, I'm not sure

that's
> > relevant. You can certainly have a Unicode-capable file with no
> > Unicode-specific data in it.
> >
> > --
> > Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP
> > Author of
> > Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for
> > Administrators, Power Users, and Developers
> > http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx
> >
> > "Roady" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> > news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> > > Also note that Exchange 5.5 doesn't support UNICODE and therefore

can't
> > > create pst-files bigger than 2GB even when you have Outlook 2003.

> >
> > >
> > > -----
> > > "Sue Mosher [MVP]" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> > > news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> > > > It applies to .pst and .ost files created in Outlook 2003. Existing

> > files
> > > > are not converted to the new format.

> >
> > > >
> > > > "Robert Gordon" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> > > > news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> > > > > I have been told that the 2 GB local cached limit has been

> eliminated
> > in
> > > > > Outlook 2003.
> > > > >
> > > > > However, does this only apply to a local cached copy created from
> > > scratch
> > > > > by
> > > > > Outlook 2003, rather than an upgrade of Outlook 2003 over an

older
> > > > install
> > > > > of
> > > > > Outlook 2000 which already has created a .ost file?
> > > > >
> > > > > The reason I ask is that I've noticed some of my Outlook 2003

> client
> > > > > receiving the
> > > > > "offline file can't be >2 GB" error message, and the common factor

> is
> > > that
> > > > > all those
> > > > > clients were done as in place upgrades to OL2K3, over Outlook

2000
> > > which
> > > > > was
> > > > > already set up for offline Send/Receive syncing, rather than

being
> > done
> > > > as
> > > > > a fresh
> > > > > install with no .ost files previously existing.
> > > > >
> > > > > Comments?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >

> >
> >

>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Sue Mosher [MVP]
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      13th Jan 2004
Cool. Sort of makes sense, although the only place I've seen Outlook think
it knows what Exchange it's talking to is with SBS.
--
Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP
Author of
Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for
Administrators, Power Users, and Developers
http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx


"Roady" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:%(E-Mail Removed)...
> Forgot to add;
> This was in a discussion where a user tried to create an ost-file bigger
> than 2GB with Outlook 2003 and Exchange 5.5.
> I first suggested to delete the original ost-file so it got rebuild and
> later to recreate the mail profile; neither worked.
>
> Diane then came with the remark that a Exchange 5.5 would be the case.
> I have to admit that I haven't tested it myself.
>
> --
> Roady
> www.sparnaaij.net
> Microsoft Office and Microsoft Office related News
> Also Outlook FAQ, How To's, Downloads and more...
>
> Questions of the month:
> -Color Code Your E-Mail Advanced
> -Add Sound To Your E-mail
>
> Subscribe to the newsletter to receive news and tips & tricks in your
> mailbox!
> www.sparnaaij.net
>
> -----
> "Roady" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> > According to Diane the size of the ost (or pst) is controlled by the

file
> > format which is
> > controlled by the server - exchange 5.5 only uses ansi versions, not
> > Unicode.
> >
> > --
> > Roady
> > www.sparnaaij.net
> > Microsoft Office and Microsoft Office related News
> > Also Outlook FAQ, How To's, Downloads and more...
> >
> > Questions of the month:
> > -Color Code Your E-Mail Advanced
> > -Add Sound To Your E-mail
> >
> > Subscribe to the newsletter to receive news and tips & tricks in your
> > mailbox!
> > www.sparnaaij.net
> >
> > -----
> > "Sue Mosher [MVP]" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> > news:eqri$(E-Mail Removed)...
> > > Since Exchange doesn't create the files, Outlook does, I'm not sure

> that's
> > > relevant. You can certainly have a Unicode-capable file with no
> > > Unicode-specific data in it.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP
> > > Author of
> > > Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for
> > > Administrators, Power Users, and Developers
> > > http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx
> > >
> > > "Roady" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> > > news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> > > > Also note that Exchange 5.5 doesn't support UNICODE and therefore

> can't
> > > > create pst-files bigger than 2GB even when you have Outlook 2003.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > -----
> > > > "Sue Mosher [MVP]" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> > > > news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> > > > > It applies to .pst and .ost files created in Outlook 2003.

Existing
> > > files
> > > > > are not converted to the new format.
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > "Robert Gordon" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> > > > > news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> > > > > > I have been told that the 2 GB local cached limit has been

> > eliminated
> > > in
> > > > > > Outlook 2003.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > However, does this only apply to a local cached copy created

from
> > > > scratch
> > > > > > by
> > > > > > Outlook 2003, rather than an upgrade of Outlook 2003 over an

> older
> > > > > install
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > Outlook 2000 which already has created a .ost file?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The reason I ask is that I've noticed some of my Outlook 2003

> > client
> > > > > > receiving the
> > > > > > "offline file can't be >2 GB" error message, and the common

factor
> > is
> > > > that
> > > > > > all those
> > > > > > clients were done as in place upgrades to OL2K3, over Outlook

> 2000
> > > > which
> > > > > > was
> > > > > > already set up for offline Send/Receive syncing, rather than

> being
> > > done
> > > > > as
> > > > > > a fresh
> > > > > > install with no .ost files previously existing.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Comments?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >

> >
> >

>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Re: OL2K3 messages, contacts into OL2K Diane Poremsky [MVP] Microsoft Outlook 1 9th Sep 2009 12:41 AM
Re: OL2K3 messages, contacts into OL2K neo [mvp outlook] Microsoft Outlook 1 9th Sep 2009 12:41 AM
PRF profile files in ol2k and ol2k3 Laura Bartl Microsoft Outlook Installation 1 8th Nov 2004 06:30 PM
>2 GB OST limit in OL2K vs. OL2K3 Robert Gordon Microsoft Outlook Discussion 8 13th Jan 2004 05:27 PM
>2 GB OST limit in OL2K vs. OL2K3 Robert Gordon Microsoft Outlook 1 11th Jan 2004 10:57 AM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:37 PM.