--
@~@ Might, Courage, Vision, SINCERITY.
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and Farce be with you!
/( _ )\ (Ubuntu 9.04) Linux 2.6.30.2
^ ^ 16:19:03 up 1 day 5 min 0 users load average: 2.52 3.19 3.63
???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ????? (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_...sub_addressesa

Was there a question in that?


--
Thomas Wendell
Helsinki, Finland
Translations to/from FI not always accurate



"Man-wai Chang to The Door (+MS=32B)" <(E-Mail Removed)> kirjoitti
viestissä:h4efl9$2o2$(E-Mail Removed)...
>
> --
> @~@ Might, Courage, Vision, SINCERITY.
> / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and Farce be with you!
> /( _ )\ (Ubuntu 9.04) Linux 2.6.30.2
> ^ ^ 16:19:03 up 1 day 5 min 0 users load average: 2.52 3.19 3.63
> ???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ????? (CSSA):
> http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_...sub_addressesa

"Man-wai Chang to The Door (+MS=32B)" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
message news:h4efl9$2o2$(E-Mail Removed)...
>
> --
> @~@ Might, Courage, Vision, SINCERITY.
> / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and Farce be with you!
> /( _ )\ (Ubuntu 9.04) Linux 2.6.30.2
> ^ ^ 16:19:03 up 1 day 5 min 0 users load average: 2.52 3.19 3.63
> ???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ????? (CSSA):
>

And still your sig line is OTT.

SteveH

I would hope not.

1920x1200 is kinda rectangle...

I would still like to see monitors that are more square possibility...

Something like:

2000x1800

^ More vertical space.

Bye,
Skybuck.

On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 19:56:59 +0200, "Skybuck Flying"
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

> I would hope not.
>
> 1920x1200 is kinda rectangle...
>
> I would still like to see monitors that are more square possibility...
>
> Something like:
>
> 2000x1800
>
> ^ More vertical space.
>
> Bye,
> Skybuck.


No! Wide screen is better.
I use 1920 x 1200 now.

"Ken" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 19:56:59 +0200, "Skybuck Flying"
> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>> I would hope not.
>>
>> 1920x1200 is kinda rectangle...
>>
>> I would still like to see monitors that are more square possibility...
>>
>> Something like:
>>
>> 2000x1800
>>
>> ^ More vertical space.
>>
>> Bye,
>> Skybuck.
>
>
> No! Wide screen is better.
> I use 1920 x 1200 now.

Me too, I still feel this is somewhat constraining, horizontally and
vertically.

Especially vertically.

Bye,
Skybuck.

Skybuck Flying wrote:
> I would hope not.
>
> 1920x1200 is kinda rectangle...
>
> I would still like to see monitors that are more square possibility...
>
> Something like:
>
> 2000x1800
>
> ^ More vertical space.
>
> Bye,
> Skybuck.

Whatever it was /you/ would find a way to break it.

--
SteveH

Man-wai Chang to The Door (+MS=32B) wrote:

> Is 1920x1080 and 1920x1200 the largest resolution for future monitors?

No, you can get higher resolution than that already. It requires
a dual link DVI interface to drive the resolution of a 30"
display.

http://store.apple.com/us/product/M9179LL/A

Apple Cinema HD Display (30" flat panel)

2560-by-1600-pixel resolution

Dual-Link DVI

As for the future, try reading the HDMI article, and
see what the very latest standard supports.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hdmi

Type B

high-resolution future displays such as WQUXGA (3840×2400)

Monitors with that high a resolution, were invented
in 2001. But were too expensive for most people to
use.

*******

The T220/T221 are examples of early high resolution displays.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_T220/T221_LCD_monitors

It is only a 22" monitor, but it has 200 pixels per inch.

http://www-307.ibm.com/pc/support/si...id=MIGR-4XWF7Y

At the time, they used a Matrox g200mms quad output video
card to drive it. I don't know how they kept all the
video outputs sync'ed in terms of frames and the like.

If you read that Wikipedia article, there is another large
display out there. Just a little bit bigger physically. You'd
need a big desk to hold this one.

Chi Mei 56" 3840×2160 QuadHDTV

http://www.gizmag.com/go/5257/

Paul

> http://store.apple.com/us/product/M9179LL/A
> Apple Cinema HD Display (30" flat panel)
> 2560-by-1600-pixel resolution

I need to modify my computer table as the 24-inch or bigger monitors are
too high. I need to raise the CD/DVD shelf at the top of the computer
table.

--
@~@ Might, Courage, Vision, SINCERITY.
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and Farce be with you!
/( _ )\ (Ubuntu 9.04) Linux 2.6.30.2
^ ^ 13:14:01 up 1 day 21:00 0 users load average: 1.19 1.33 1.38
�借貸! ��騙! ��交! �打交! �打劫! �自殺! 請考慮綜� (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_...sub_addressesa

Man-wai Chang to The Door (+MS=32B) wrote:
>> http://store.apple.com/us/product/M9179LL/A
>> Apple Cinema HD Display (30" flat panel)
>> 2560-by-1600-pixel resolution
>
> I need to modify my computer table as the 24-inch or bigger monitors are
> too high. I need to raise the CD/DVD shelf at the top of the computer
> table.
>

I built my own table. There is no shelving on top, so if you
want to give me your 30" monitor, I have room for it. :-)

Paul