brett wrote:
> I recently purchased a 22" 1600x1050 monitor. I have a 17" monitor
> on my laptop with the same resolution. Basically, I just have a
> larger viewer area with the same realestate.
>
> I develop software and want more space to view open windows. The
> difference in price between a 22" 1600x1050 ($400) monitor and a 24"
> 1920x1200 ($700) monitor is about $300. Are the differences in real
> estate going to be that great? Is it worth the price in other
> words? No stores around me have the larger monitor to see what it
> looks like.
>
> Does any one preferences on a name brand for the the 24" size?
Think of it this way...
If your icons take up 32x32 pixels... And the spacing on any side of them
is 43 pixels to the next icon...
21 icons across for your current monitor (22").
25 or so for the 24" monitor.
Truthfully - for anyone who uses their computer as a professional - multiple
monitors are the way to go IMHO.
Two 22" monitors would probably give you what you need and in a better way
than one monitor ever could - even widescreen alone won't do as well.
Taking my icon example...
42 icons for the dual 22" monitor setup.
25 for a single 24" monitor.
With your pricing - $800 for two 22" or $700 for one 24".
Of course - this assumes your current video card (if new - it probably does)
supports dual monitors.
Dual DVI being your current best choice.
--
Shenan Stanley
MS-MVP
--
How To Ask Questions The Smart Way
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html