I have none of that weirdness here and I have my Address Book and new
Contacts set to default to First Last as well.
At this point, I'd suggest you try it with a clean mail profile and see how
that works for you.
See
http://www.howto-outlook.com/faq/newprofile.htm
--
Robert Sparnaaij [MVP-Outlook]
Coauthor, Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003
http://www.howto-outlook.com/
Outlook FAQ, HowTo, Downloads, Add-Ins and more
http://www.msoutlook.info/
Real World Questions, Real World Answers
-----
"DWalker07" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Outlook 2007 at version 12.0.6425.1000 *still* does weird things as far
> as displaying the "Send/Receive dialog box" on Windows XP Pro. I connect
> to an Exchange server and a POP/SMTP server.
>
> Each day, I close Outlook when I go home. The next day, after I open
> Outlook, it will display a completely blank Send/Receive dialog box with
> no content -- just the outline and the title bar; the whole interior is a
> solid gray color. Weird. Sometimes this happens at random times during
> the day.
>
> If I close and reopen Outlook AGAIN, the Send/Receive dialog will usually
> appear again, but this time I can see the contents -- and the "Hide this
> dialog box during send/receive" box is unchecked. So I can check that
> box IF I AM FAST ENOUGH, and close Outlook, and open it again. If I am
> not fast enough in checking that box before it goes away, I can't set it.
> The box is annoying, so please don't suggest that since it sometimes goes
> away quickly, I shouldn't worry about it. I would like the code to work
> as designed.
>
> I am convinced that programmers at Microsoft must all run with this
> dialog box displayed, or else they would realize how hard it is to kill.
> (I'm also convinced that in the days of Outlook 2000 and Outlook 2003,
> ALL programmers must have set the default "File As" order for contacts to
> be "Last, First". I say this because setting the default order to "First
> Last" would not stick; about once a day, it would revert to "Last,
> First", and many of the several methods to add a contact to the address
> book would ignore the setting and show the wrong display method for that
> contact -- even though it had the correct First name and Last name. Half
> the programmers should be required to use the "First Last" setting to get
> it debugged! Otherwise, none of the programmers would notice that the
> setting had a strong affinity to work one way.)
>
> Anyway, I would appreciate any suggestions.
>
> Thanks.
>
> David Walker