In order to utilise a shared hosting supplier such as those mentioned, it
would be a good idea to reduce the amount of computational effort required
for your asp.net site.
Such hosting providers can cap the amount of CPU usage allowed, along with
the amount of bandwidth provided.
In order to limit the first, try to employ output caching:
ASP.NET Caching Features
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/xsbfdd8c(vs.71).aspx
@ OutputCache http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hdxfb6cy(VS.71).aspx
HOW TO: Improve Performance by Caching Pages in ASP.NET
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/315896/en-us
How To Perform Fragment Caching in ASP.NET by Using Visual C# .NET
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/308378
How to cache in ASP.NET by using Visual C# .NET
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/323290/en-us
How To Control Page Output Caching in ASP.NET by Using Visual C# .NET
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/308375/en-us
"tonim" wrote:
> 10 000 000 uniques. ! unique = 1 page view. Site is ASP.NET 2.0 and SQL
> Server 2005. 1 visit is 3-5 database access (smal number of fields with
> datareader). No pictures or other multimedia, only text.
>
> Can I run this on some good shared hosting like www.re-invent.com or
> www.hostinguk.net or I need to VPS for this site?
>
>
>
Similar Threads
