PC Review


Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread

(1) 512MB or (2) 256MB cards?

 
 
eq100hz@gmail.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      24th Aug 2006
I am getting ready to purchase a new system...Does anyone have an
opinion if I am better off to purchase (1) 512MB video card or (2)
256MB cards for a system?

I don't think I am going to be able to swing (2) 512MB cards, so I need
to make a choice...

Thoughts? TIA!

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Machete
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      24th Aug 2006
I should mention I am only going to be running (2) 19" DVI LCD's on
this system.

 
Reply With Quote
 
Frodo
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      24th Aug 2006
Two X1600 should, do for the price, they start around $85, after rebate.

<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>I am getting ready to purchase a new system...Does anyone have an
> opinion if I am better off to purchase (1) 512MB video card or (2)
> 256MB cards for a system?
>
> I don't think I am going to be able to swing (2) 512MB cards, so I need
> to make a choice...
>
> Thoughts? TIA!
>
>




 
Reply With Quote
 
Tom Scales
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      25th Aug 2006

"Machete" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>I should mention I am only going to be running (2) 19" DVI LCD's on
> this system.
>


Why two? You just need one.


 
Reply With Quote
 
Clint
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      25th Aug 2006
Here's my thoughts/opinions...

1) 512MB of RAM is probably more than you need, so I wouldn't worry about
the amount of RAM. It's the speed of the processors that will kill your
game playing experience.

2) In fact, AFAIK, if you put in the 2x256MB cards, because of the way the
SLI/Crossfire is done, it's equivalent to 1 fast 256MB card, not a fast
512MB card. See this link for some info on SLI:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scalable_Link_Interface. Yes, I realize it's a
wiki, but you can go do your own research if you don't trust it.

3) Having lots of RAM but a slower card is a fool's game, because the card
can't keep up with the textures anyway, so it won't do you any good.

4) You're better off getting one fast card than two slower ones. If you
buy a single fast one, you can upgrade it later with another fast one. But
if you get two slower ones, you're pretty much maxed out.

5) Depending on the game, you may not be able to drive a game to dual 19"
monitors with either a single "large" card or two small ones. Oblivion, for
example, would probably require two fast cards to drive dual 19" displays
properly, and even then it may bog down at times. That's a combined
resolution of 2560 x 1024 (2x1280), which is a lot of pixels.

6) If you're not going to drive a game to both displays at the same time,
then you're just doing 1280x1024, and you'd probably do fine with a single
high-end card, like an ATI X1900xxx card (whatever you can afford). I run
Oblivion reasonably well on my X1800GTO (256MB of RAM), driving a 20"
monitor at 1280x800 (widescreen). It bogs down in some places, but not badly
after I've tweaked the graphics settings. Definately playable and
enjoyable.

If you want better input, here's some questions. Why do you need 512MB of
RAM? What are you using the system for? If it's for games, which ones? If
it's not for games, all of this is a moot point, because even a single low
end ATI 9250 can drive dual 19" displays in 2d mode.

Clint

<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>I am getting ready to purchase a new system...Does anyone have an
> opinion if I am better off to purchase (1) 512MB video card or (2)
> 256MB cards for a system?
>
> I don't think I am going to be able to swing (2) 512MB cards, so I need
> to make a choice...
>
> Thoughts? TIA!
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
eq100hz@gmail.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      25th Aug 2006
I am doing CAD and heavy 3D rendering...what about the new X1950XTX ?

Can you use (2) of those in one system?

 
Reply With Quote
 
Machete
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      25th Aug 2006
Clint,

Thanks for your thoughts & questions. I clearly was to abbrivated in
my initial posts...(call it lack of knowledge) which is why I am
here...

No this system isn't for gaming, it's for AutoCAD 2007 and 3D Rendering
with occasional NLE of DV for DVD production.

I am currently eyeing the 7350 or 7300. Any benefits over the larger
card speed wise?

Thanks again!

 
Reply With Quote
 
HockeyTownUSA
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      25th Aug 2006

"Machete" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Clint,
>
> Thanks for your thoughts & questions. I clearly was to abbrivated in
> my initial posts...(call it lack of knowledge) which is why I am
> here...
>
> No this system isn't for gaming, it's for AutoCAD 2007 and 3D Rendering
> with occasional NLE of DV for DVD production.
>
> I am currently eyeing the 7350 or 7300. Any benefits over the larger
> card speed wise?
>
> Thanks again!
>


For CAD you may want more memory over speed. Your 3D refresh doesn't need to
be spectacular, but if you tend to shade your models it may make it much
more quick.


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
256MB vs. 512MB? brett Video Cards 2 27th Nov 2006 04:59 PM
Committed Mem being used greater with 256mb vs. 512mb RAM =?Utf-8?B?Q2hhcmxpZQ==?= Windows XP Embedded 2 12th Oct 2005 10:11 PM
Ram error 512mb, or 256mb? Ravi Sandhu Computer Hardware 3 5th Apr 2004 11:02 PM
Ram error 512mb, or 256mb? Ravi Sandhu DIY PC 3 5th Apr 2004 11:02 PM
256MB and 512MB RAM =?Utf-8?B?QW50aG9ueQ==?= Windows XP Hardware 11 18th Mar 2004 08:17 PM


Features
 

Advertising
 

Newsgroups
 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:06 AM.