| Home | Forums | Reviews | Articles | Register |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
|
| |
|
nut cracker
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
have someone make sure that the switch ports are not set to auto. I have
seen lots and lots of problems with managed switches auto negotiating with clients. hardcode the ports on the swtiches to 100 Full, and make sure that the NIC on each client (server or workstation.. doesnt matter) is also configured for 100Full. This should help exponentially. NuTs "jim mcgrath" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:5acb01c3e5d1$05d0a030$(E-Mail Removed)... > I recently had 2 new switches installed at my site and > started having strange problems occure. Users (who use > roaming profiles) went from 5-10 seconds to login, to > about 5 MINUTES. When I try to access User Manager (from > NT4 server tools), it takes upwards of 5 minutes to load > the user list, where it used to take 2-3 seconds. I am > getting random "windows delayed write" errors on a 2nd > server (NTS2), and network drives disappear momentarily > and then come back. It takes forever to copy a 2mb file > to the network drive on the primary server (NTS1), it > will eventually stop and give a "path is too deep" > error. Yesterday I sat with our communications person > and tested the switch for 2 hours, which he indicated has > NO problems. I have been checking through technet, but > since I am not exactly what is happening, I am finding it > hard to find anything really relevant. Except for > KB135464 (browsing errors with UDP forwarding), these > have increased GREATLY since the switch was installed. > The switch installer (a different guy) said that the new > ones were on VLAN2 instead of the current VLAN1 the rest > were on. I have nothing to do with switch management, > but am wondering if this may have something to do with > it? He indicated that the others (on VLAN1) weren't > being changed. Plus the problem seems to be > intermittent. This morning it was fine, then stopped > working, then was fine again, then stopped working. I > have gone through the events logs on the servers and > can't see anything that's indicating a problem, other > than that above, where I am getting an event ID of 8003 > repeatedly. > > HELP! |
|
||
|
||||
|
Jim McGrath
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
This was one of the first things that I had done, along
with doing 2 hours of diagnostics on the new switches to confirm that they were configured the same as the previous "master" switch. It has no effect at all. j >-----Original Message----- >have someone make sure that the switch ports are not set to auto. I have >seen lots and lots of problems with managed switches auto negotiating with >clients. > >hardcode the ports on the swtiches to 100 Full, and make sure that the NIC >on each client (server or workstation.. doesnt matter) is also configured >for 100Full. > >This should help exponentially. > >NuTs > >"jim mcgrath" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message >news:5acb01c3e5d1$05d0a030$(E-Mail Removed)... >> I recently had 2 new switches installed at my site and >> started having strange problems occure. Users (who use >> roaming profiles) went from 5-10 seconds to login, to >> about 5 MINUTES. When I try to access User Manager (from >> NT4 server tools), it takes upwards of 5 minutes to load >> the user list, where it used to take 2-3 seconds. I am >> getting random "windows delayed write" errors on a 2nd >> server (NTS2), and network drives disappear momentarily >> and then come back. It takes forever to copy a 2mb file >> to the network drive on the primary server (NTS1), it >> will eventually stop and give a "path is too deep" >> error. Yesterday I sat with our communications person >> and tested the switch for 2 hours, which he indicated has >> NO problems. I have been checking through technet, but >> since I am not exactly what is happening, I am finding it >> hard to find anything really relevant. Except for >> KB135464 (browsing errors with UDP forwarding), these >> have increased GREATLY since the switch was installed. >> The switch installer (a different guy) said that the new >> ones were on VLAN2 instead of the current VLAN1 the rest >> were on. I have nothing to do with switch management, >> but am wondering if this may have something to do with >> it? He indicated that the others (on VLAN1) weren't >> being changed. Plus the problem seems to be >> intermittent. This morning it was fine, then stopped >> working, then was fine again, then stopped working. I >> have gone through the events logs on the servers and >> can't see anything that's indicating a problem, other >> than that above, where I am getting an event ID of 8003 >> repeatedly. >> >> HELP! > > >. > |
|
||
|
||||
|
nut cracker
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
what kind of swtiches are you working with ?
"Jim McGrath" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:648101c3e67c$1e566ee0$(E-Mail Removed)... > This was one of the first things that I had done, along > with doing 2 hours of diagnostics on the new switches to > confirm that they were configured the same as the > previous "master" switch. It has no effect at all. > > j > > >-----Original Message----- > >have someone make sure that the switch ports are not set > to auto. I have > >seen lots and lots of problems with managed switches > auto negotiating with > >clients. > > > >hardcode the ports on the swtiches to 100 Full, and make > sure that the NIC > >on each client (server or workstation.. doesnt matter) > is also configured > >for 100Full. > > > >This should help exponentially. > > > >NuTs > > > >"jim mcgrath" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message > >news:5acb01c3e5d1$05d0a030$(E-Mail Removed)... > >> I recently had 2 new switches installed at my site and > >> started having strange problems occure. Users (who use > >> roaming profiles) went from 5-10 seconds to login, to > >> about 5 MINUTES. When I try to access User Manager > (from > >> NT4 server tools), it takes upwards of 5 minutes to > load > >> the user list, where it used to take 2-3 seconds. I am > >> getting random "windows delayed write" errors on a 2nd > >> server (NTS2), and network drives disappear momentarily > >> and then come back. It takes forever to copy a 2mb > file > >> to the network drive on the primary server (NTS1), it > >> will eventually stop and give a "path is too deep" > >> error. Yesterday I sat with our communications person > >> and tested the switch for 2 hours, which he indicated > has > >> NO problems. I have been checking through technet, but > >> since I am not exactly what is happening, I am finding > it > >> hard to find anything really relevant. Except for > >> KB135464 (browsing errors with UDP forwarding), these > >> have increased GREATLY since the switch was installed. > >> The switch installer (a different guy) said that the > new > >> ones were on VLAN2 instead of the current VLAN1 the > rest > >> were on. I have nothing to do with switch management, > >> but am wondering if this may have something to do with > >> it? He indicated that the others (on VLAN1) weren't > >> being changed. Plus the problem seems to be > >> intermittent. This morning it was fine, then stopped > >> working, then was fine again, then stopped working. I > >> have gone through the events logs on the servers and > >> can't see anything that's indicating a problem, other > >> than that above, where I am getting an event ID of 8003 > >> repeatedly. > >> > >> HELP! > > > > > >. > > |
|
||
|
||||
|
jim mcgrath
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Cisco 2950 is the new master switch. The rest (3 x Cisco
2900 and 1 x Cisco 2900XL and 1 x Cisco 2950) are uplinked to it. j >-----Original Message----- >what kind of swtiches are you working with ? > >"Jim McGrath" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message >news:648101c3e67c$1e566ee0$(E-Mail Removed)... >> This was one of the first things that I had done, along >> with doing 2 hours of diagnostics on the new switches to >> confirm that they were configured the same as the >> previous "master" switch. It has no effect at all. >> >> j >> >> >-----Original Message----- >> >have someone make sure that the switch ports are not set >> to auto. I have >> >seen lots and lots of problems with managed switches >> auto negotiating with >> >clients. >> > >> >hardcode the ports on the swtiches to 100 Full, and make >> sure that the NIC >> >on each client (server or workstation.. doesnt matter) >> is also configured >> >for 100Full. >> > >> >This should help exponentially. >> > >> >NuTs >> > >> >"jim mcgrath" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message >> >news:5acb01c3e5d1$05d0a030$(E-Mail Removed)... >> >> I recently had 2 new switches installed at my site and >> >> started having strange problems occure. Users (who use >> >> roaming profiles) went from 5-10 seconds to login, to >> >> about 5 MINUTES. When I try to access User Manager >> (from >> >> NT4 server tools), it takes upwards of 5 minutes to >> load >> >> the user list, where it used to take 2-3 seconds. I am >> >> getting random "windows delayed write" errors on a 2nd >> >> server (NTS2), and network drives disappear momentarily >> >> and then come back. It takes forever to copy a 2mb >> file >> >> to the network drive on the primary server (NTS1), it >> >> will eventually stop and give a "path is too deep" >> >> error. Yesterday I sat with our communications person >> >> and tested the switch for 2 hours, which he indicated >> has >> >> NO problems. I have been checking through technet, but >> >> since I am not exactly what is happening, I am finding >> it >> >> hard to find anything really relevant. Except for >> >> KB135464 (browsing errors with UDP forwarding), these >> >> have increased GREATLY since the switch was installed. >> >> The switch installer (a different guy) said that the >> new >> >> ones were on VLAN2 instead of the current VLAN1 the >> rest >> >> were on. I have nothing to do with switch management, >> >> but am wondering if this may have something to do with >> >> it? He indicated that the others (on VLAN1) weren't >> >> being changed. Plus the problem seems to be >> >> intermittent. This morning it was fine, then stopped >> >> working, then was fine again, then stopped working. I >> >> have gone through the events logs on the servers and >> >> can't see anything that's indicating a problem, other >> >> than that above, where I am getting an event ID of 8003 >> >> repeatedly. >> >> >> >> HELP! >> > >> > >> >. >> > > > >. > |
|
||
|
||||
|
nut cracker
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Is data transfer between devices on the same switch, but transfers that need
to go from the distribution switch, up to the core switch, and down to the other distribution switch are sucky ? NuTs "jim mcgrath" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:65cd01c3e6a9$30b73380$(E-Mail Removed)... > Cisco 2950 is the new master switch. The rest (3 x Cisco > 2900 and 1 x Cisco 2900XL and 1 x Cisco 2950) are > uplinked to it. > > j > >-----Original Message----- > >what kind of swtiches are you working with ? > > > >"Jim McGrath" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message > >news:648101c3e67c$1e566ee0$(E-Mail Removed)... > >> This was one of the first things that I had done, along > >> with doing 2 hours of diagnostics on the new switches > to > >> confirm that they were configured the same as the > >> previous "master" switch. It has no effect at all. > >> > >> j > >> > >> >-----Original Message----- > >> >have someone make sure that the switch ports are not > set > >> to auto. I have > >> >seen lots and lots of problems with managed switches > >> auto negotiating with > >> >clients. > >> > > >> >hardcode the ports on the swtiches to 100 Full, and > make > >> sure that the NIC > >> >on each client (server or workstation.. doesnt > matter) > >> is also configured > >> >for 100Full. > >> > > >> >This should help exponentially. > >> > > >> >NuTs > >> > > >> >"jim mcgrath" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message > >> >news:5acb01c3e5d1$05d0a030$(E-Mail Removed)... > >> >> I recently had 2 new switches installed at my site > and > >> >> started having strange problems occure. Users (who > use > >> >> roaming profiles) went from 5-10 seconds to login, > to > >> >> about 5 MINUTES. When I try to access User Manager > >> (from > >> >> NT4 server tools), it takes upwards of 5 minutes to > >> load > >> >> the user list, where it used to take 2-3 seconds. > I am > >> >> getting random "windows delayed write" errors on a > 2nd > >> >> server (NTS2), and network drives disappear > momentarily > >> >> and then come back. It takes forever to copy a 2mb > >> file > >> >> to the network drive on the primary server (NTS1), > it > >> >> will eventually stop and give a "path is too deep" > >> >> error. Yesterday I sat with our communications > person > >> >> and tested the switch for 2 hours, which he > indicated > >> has > >> >> NO problems. I have been checking through technet, > but > >> >> since I am not exactly what is happening, I am > finding > >> it > >> >> hard to find anything really relevant. Except for > >> >> KB135464 (browsing errors with UDP forwarding), > these > >> >> have increased GREATLY since the switch was > installed. > >> >> The switch installer (a different guy) said that the > >> new > >> >> ones were on VLAN2 instead of the current VLAN1 the > >> rest > >> >> were on. I have nothing to do with switch > management, > >> >> but am wondering if this may have something to do > with > >> >> it? He indicated that the others (on VLAN1) weren't > >> >> being changed. Plus the problem seems to be > >> >> intermittent. This morning it was fine, then > stopped > >> >> working, then was fine again, then stopped > working. I > >> >> have gone through the events logs on the servers and > >> >> can't see anything that's indicating a problem, > other > >> >> than that above, where I am getting an event ID of > 8003 > >> >> repeatedly. > >> >> > >> >> HELP! > >> > > >> > > >> >. > >> > > > > > > >. > > |
|
||
|
||||
|
jim mcgrath
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
All our labs are connected to their own switches (each
one has it's own). These in turn are then uplinked to the master switch which contains the servers, printers, my workstation (as admin) and the backbone connection (for internet). I reinstalled both XPSP1 on my machine and 2KSP4 on the server and the loading of user manager has increased to the speed it used to be. But I am still finding that the users that are logging in from the labs are still taking a long time to load their roaming profiles. What used to take 5-10 seconds now takes 4-5 minutes. We did analysis on the new master switch, and the primary server (NTS1) seems to be getting packets from my machine, but it takes a VERY long time to respond, like 20+ seconds in some cases. I am still in the process of doing some testing (most users profiles are different sizes, and this mornings user may just have a large profile (20mb) though, it should not take 4-5 minutes to load it. I am finding a performance increase from my machine, but that's not to say it's fixed everywhere. What I don't understand is that I neither installed any new drivers/software onto either my machine or the server to cause something like this to happen. j >-----Original Message----- >Is data transfer between devices on the same switch, but transfers that need >to go from the distribution switch, up to the core switch, and down to the >other distribution switch are sucky ? > >NuTs > >"jim mcgrath" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message >news:65cd01c3e6a9$30b73380$(E-Mail Removed)... >> Cisco 2950 is the new master switch. The rest (3 x Cisco >> 2900 and 1 x Cisco 2900XL and 1 x Cisco 2950) are >> uplinked to it. >> >> j >> >-----Original Message----- >> >what kind of swtiches are you working with ? >> > >> >"Jim McGrath" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message >> >news:648101c3e67c$1e566ee0$(E-Mail Removed)... >> >> This was one of the first things that I had done, along >> >> with doing 2 hours of diagnostics on the new switches >> to >> >> confirm that they were configured the same as the >> >> previous "master" switch. It has no effect at all. >> >> >> >> j >> >> >> >> >-----Original Message----- >> >> >have someone make sure that the switch ports are not >> set >> >> to auto. I have >> >> >seen lots and lots of problems with managed switches >> >> auto negotiating with >> >> >clients. >> >> > >> >> >hardcode the ports on the swtiches to 100 Full, and >> make >> >> sure that the NIC >> >> >on each client (server or workstation.. doesnt >> matter) >> >> is also configured >> >> >for 100Full. >> >> > >> >> >This should help exponentially. >> >> > >> >> >NuTs >> >> > >> >> >"jim mcgrath" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message >> >> >news:5acb01c3e5d1$05d0a030$(E-Mail Removed)... >> >> >> I recently had 2 new switches installed at my site >> and >> >> >> started having strange problems occure. Users (who >> use >> >> >> roaming profiles) went from 5-10 seconds to login, >> to >> >> >> about 5 MINUTES. When I try to access User Manager >> >> (from >> >> >> NT4 server tools), it takes upwards of 5 minutes to >> >> load >> >> >> the user list, where it used to take 2-3 seconds. >> I am >> >> >> getting random "windows delayed write" errors on a >> 2nd >> >> >> server (NTS2), and network drives disappear >> momentarily >> >> >> and then come back. It takes forever to copy a 2mb >> >> file >> >> >> to the network drive on the primary server (NTS1), >> it >> >> >> will eventually stop and give a "path is too deep" >> >> >> error. Yesterday I sat with our communications >> person >> >> >> and tested the switch for 2 hours, which he >> indicated >> >> has >> >> >> NO problems. I have been checking through technet, >> but >> >> >> since I am not exactly what is happening, I am >> finding >> >> it >> >> >> hard to find anything really relevant. Except for >> >> >> KB135464 (browsing errors with UDP forwarding), >> these >> >> >> have increased GREATLY since the switch was >> installed. >> >> >> The switch installer (a different guy) said that the >> >> new >> >> >> ones were on VLAN2 instead of the current VLAN1 the >> >> rest >> >> >> were on. I have nothing to do with switch >> management, >> >> >> but am wondering if this may have something to do >> with >> >> >> it? He indicated that the others (on VLAN1) weren't >> >> >> being changed. Plus the problem seems to be >> >> >> intermittent. This morning it was fine, then >> stopped >> >> >> working, then was fine again, then stopped >> working. I >> >> >> have gone through the events logs on the servers and >> >> >> can't see anything that's indicating a problem, >> other >> >> >> than that above, where I am getting an event ID of >> 8003 >> >> >> repeatedly. >> >> >> >> >> >> HELP! >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >. >> >> > >> > >> > >> >. >> > > > >. > |
|
||
|
||||
|
nut cracker
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Ok..
Is inter-switch performance acceptable ? (server to server, or workstation to workstation) NuTs "jim mcgrath" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:6d3a01c3e74f$a00c0200$(E-Mail Removed)... > All our labs are connected to their own switches (each > one has it's own). These in turn are then uplinked to > the master switch which contains the servers, printers, > my workstation (as admin) and the backbone connection > (for internet). > > I reinstalled both XPSP1 on my machine and 2KSP4 on the > server and the loading of user manager has increased to > the speed it used to be. But I am still finding that the > users that are logging in from the labs are still taking > a long time to load their roaming profiles. What used to > take 5-10 seconds now takes 4-5 minutes. > > We did analysis on the new master switch, and the primary > server (NTS1) seems to be getting packets from my > machine, but it takes a VERY long time to respond, like > 20+ seconds in some cases. > > I am still in the process of doing some testing (most > users profiles are different sizes, and this mornings > user may just have a large profile (20mb) though, it > should not take 4-5 minutes to load it. I am finding a > performance increase from my machine, but that's not to > say it's fixed everywhere. What I don't understand is > that I neither installed any new drivers/software onto > either my machine or the server to cause something like > this to happen. > > j > > >-----Original Message----- > >Is data transfer between devices on the same switch, but > transfers that need > >to go from the distribution switch, up to the core > switch, and down to the > >other distribution switch are sucky ? > > > >NuTs > > > >"jim mcgrath" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message > >news:65cd01c3e6a9$30b73380$(E-Mail Removed)... > >> Cisco 2950 is the new master switch. The rest (3 x > Cisco > >> 2900 and 1 x Cisco 2900XL and 1 x Cisco 2950) are > >> uplinked to it. > >> > >> j > >> >-----Original Message----- > >> >what kind of swtiches are you working with ? > >> > > >> >"Jim McGrath" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message > >> >news:648101c3e67c$1e566ee0$(E-Mail Removed)... > >> >> This was one of the first things that I had done, > along > >> >> with doing 2 hours of diagnostics on the new > switches > >> to > >> >> confirm that they were configured the same as the > >> >> previous "master" switch. It has no effect at all. > >> >> > >> >> j > >> >> > >> >> >-----Original Message----- > >> >> >have someone make sure that the switch ports are > not > >> set > >> >> to auto. I have > >> >> >seen lots and lots of problems with managed > switches > >> >> auto negotiating with > >> >> >clients. > >> >> > > >> >> >hardcode the ports on the swtiches to 100 Full, and > >> make > >> >> sure that the NIC > >> >> >on each client (server or workstation.. doesnt > >> matter) > >> >> is also configured > >> >> >for 100Full. > >> >> > > >> >> >This should help exponentially. > >> >> > > >> >> >NuTs > >> >> > > >> >> >"jim mcgrath" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message > >> >> >news:5acb01c3e5d1$05d0a030$(E-Mail Removed)... > >> >> >> I recently had 2 new switches installed at my > site > >> and > >> >> >> started having strange problems occure. Users > (who > >> use > >> >> >> roaming profiles) went from 5-10 seconds to > login, > >> to > >> >> >> about 5 MINUTES. When I try to access User > Manager > >> >> (from > >> >> >> NT4 server tools), it takes upwards of 5 minutes > to > >> >> load > >> >> >> the user list, where it used to take 2-3 seconds. > >> I am > >> >> >> getting random "windows delayed write" errors on > a > >> 2nd > >> >> >> server (NTS2), and network drives disappear > >> momentarily > >> >> >> and then come back. It takes forever to copy a > 2mb > >> >> file > >> >> >> to the network drive on the primary server > (NTS1), > >> it > >> >> >> will eventually stop and give a "path is too > deep" > >> >> >> error. Yesterday I sat with our communications > >> person > >> >> >> and tested the switch for 2 hours, which he > >> indicated > >> >> has > >> >> >> NO problems. I have been checking through > technet, > >> but > >> >> >> since I am not exactly what is happening, I am > >> finding > >> >> it > >> >> >> hard to find anything really relevant. Except > for > >> >> >> KB135464 (browsing errors with UDP forwarding), > >> these > >> >> >> have increased GREATLY since the switch was > >> installed. > >> >> >> The switch installer (a different guy) said that > the > >> >> new > >> >> >> ones were on VLAN2 instead of the current VLAN1 > the > >> >> rest > >> >> >> were on. I have nothing to do with switch > >> management, > >> >> >> but am wondering if this may have something to do > >> with > >> >> >> it? He indicated that the others (on VLAN1) > weren't > >> >> >> being changed. Plus the problem seems to be > >> >> >> intermittent. This morning it was fine, then > >> stopped > >> >> >> working, then was fine again, then stopped > >> working. I > >> >> >> have gone through the events logs on the servers > and > >> >> >> can't see anything that's indicating a problem, > >> other > >> >> >> than that above, where I am getting an event ID > of > >> 8003 > >> >> >> repeatedly. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> HELP! > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> >. > >> >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >. > >> > > > > > > >. > > |
|
||
|
||||
|
jim mcgrath
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I have the same performance issues loading profiles both
from other switches as well as the master switch from a workstation. There doesn't seem to be problems when working server to server when on the same switch though. I had corp IT check the switches, and they INSIST that there is nothing wrong. But I was on VLAN1 and they said they put the new switches on VLAN2, but I don't recall them reprogramming the other 4 switches to the new VLAN. I asked about it and was told they were too busy to check it - though it's their job to manage my switches. I am just flying blind trying to find SOME indication to where the problem is coming from. >-----Original Message----- >Ok.. > >Is inter-switch performance acceptable ? (server to server, or workstation >to workstation) > >NuTs > >"jim mcgrath" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message >news:6d3a01c3e74f$a00c0200$(E-Mail Removed)... >> All our labs are connected to their own switches (each >> one has it's own). These in turn are then uplinked to >> the master switch which contains the servers, printers, >> my workstation (as admin) and the backbone connection >> (for internet). >> >> I reinstalled both XPSP1 on my machine and 2KSP4 on the >> server and the loading of user manager has increased to >> the speed it used to be. But I am still finding that the >> users that are logging in from the labs are still taking >> a long time to load their roaming profiles. What used to >> take 5-10 seconds now takes 4-5 minutes. >> >> We did analysis on the new master switch, and the primary >> server (NTS1) seems to be getting packets from my >> machine, but it takes a VERY long time to respond, like >> 20+ seconds in some cases. >> >> I am still in the process of doing some testing (most >> users profiles are different sizes, and this mornings >> user may just have a large profile (20mb) though, it >> should not take 4-5 minutes to load it. I am finding a >> performance increase from my machine, but that's not to >> say it's fixed everywhere. What I don't understand is >> that I neither installed any new drivers/software onto >> either my machine or the server to cause something like >> this to happen. >> >> j >> >> >-----Original Message----- >> >Is data transfer between devices on the same switch, but >> transfers that need >> >to go from the distribution switch, up to the core >> switch, and down to the >> >other distribution switch are sucky ? >> > >> >NuTs >> > >> >"jim mcgrath" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message >> >news:65cd01c3e6a9$30b73380$(E-Mail Removed)... >> >> Cisco 2950 is the new master switch. The rest (3 x >> Cisco >> >> 2900 and 1 x Cisco 2900XL and 1 x Cisco 2950) are >> >> uplinked to it. >> >> >> >> j >> >> >-----Original Message----- >> >> >what kind of swtiches are you working with ? >> >> > >> >> >"Jim McGrath" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message >> >> >news:648101c3e67c$1e566ee0$(E-Mail Removed)... >> >> >> This was one of the first things that I had done, >> along >> >> >> with doing 2 hours of diagnostics on the new >> switches >> >> to >> >> >> confirm that they were configured the same as the >> >> >> previous "master" switch. It has no effect at all. >> >> >> >> >> >> j >> >> >> >> >> >> >-----Original Message----- >> >> >> >have someone make sure that the switch ports are >> not >> >> set >> >> >> to auto. I have >> >> >> >seen lots and lots of problems with managed >> switches >> >> >> auto negotiating with >> >> >> >clients. >> >> >> > >> >> >> >hardcode the ports on the swtiches to 100 Full, and >> >> make >> >> >> sure that the NIC >> >> >> >on each client (server or workstation.. doesnt >> >> matter) >> >> >> is also configured >> >> >> >for 100Full. >> >> >> > >> >> >> >This should help exponentially. >> >> >> > >> >> >> >NuTs >> >> >> > >> >> >> >"jim mcgrath" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message >> >> >> >news:5acb01c3e5d1$05d0a030$(E-Mail Removed)... >> >> >> >> I recently had 2 new switches installed at my >> site >> >> and >> >> >> >> started having strange problems occure. Users >> (who >> >> use >> >> >> >> roaming profiles) went from 5-10 seconds to >> login, >> >> to >> >> >> >> about 5 MINUTES. When I try to access User >> Manager >> >> >> (from >> >> >> >> NT4 server tools), it takes upwards of 5 minutes >> to >> >> >> load >> >> >> >> the user list, where it used to take 2-3 seconds. >> >> I am >> >> >> >> getting random "windows delayed write" errors on >> a >> >> 2nd >> >> >> >> server (NTS2), and network drives disappear >> >> momentarily >> >> >> >> and then come back. It takes forever to copy a >> 2mb >> >> >> file >> >> >> >> to the network drive on the primary server >> (NTS1), >> >> it >> >> >> >> will eventually stop and give a "path is too >> deep" >> >> >> >> error. Yesterday I sat with our communications >> >> person >> >> >> >> and tested the switch for 2 hours, which he >> >> indicated >> >> >> has >> >> >> >> NO problems. I have been checking through >> technet, >> >> but >> >> >> >> since I am not exactly what is happening, I am >> >> finding >> >> >> it >> >> >> >> hard to find anything really relevant. Except >> for >> >> >> >> KB135464 (browsing errors with UDP forwarding), >> >> these >> >> >> >> have increased GREATLY since the switch was >> >> installed. >> >> >> >> The switch installer (a different guy) said that >> the >> >> >> new >> >> >> >> ones were on VLAN2 instead of the current VLAN1 >> the >> >> >> rest >> >> >> >> were on. I have nothing to do with switch >> >> management, >> >> >> >> but am wondering if this may have something to do >> >> with >> >> >> >> it? He indicated that the others (on VLAN1) >> weren't >> >> >> >> being changed. Plus the problem seems to be >> >> >> >> intermittent. This morning it was fine, then >> >> stopped >> >> >> >> working, then was fine again, then stopped >> >> working. I >> >> >> >> have gone through the events logs on the servers >> and >> >> >> >> can't see anything that's indicating a problem, >> >> other >> >> >> >> than that above, where I am getting an event ID >> of >> >> 8003 >> >> >> >> repeatedly. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> HELP! >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >. >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >. >> >> > >> > >> > >> >. >> > > > >. > |
|
||
|
||||
|
nut cracker
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
If you are using different VLANS and having these problems, its a routing
problem between the VLANS. I am not a network hardware guy, so I cant even imagine how to instruct you to verify this. But, our environment has had these types of problems, and our network group said it was because the routing between the VLANS wasnt correct. Thats about all I can add to this discussion. NuTs "jim mcgrath" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:751301c3e817$5ee5b4b0$(E-Mail Removed)... > I have the same performance issues loading profiles both > from other switches as well as the master switch from a > workstation. There doesn't seem to be problems when > working server to server when on the same switch though. > I had corp IT check the switches, and they INSIST that > there is nothing wrong. But I was on VLAN1 and they said > they put the new switches on VLAN2, but I don't recall > them reprogramming the other 4 switches to the new VLAN. > I asked about it and was told they were too busy to check > it - though it's their job to manage my switches. I am > just flying blind trying to find SOME indication to where > the problem is coming from. > > > >-----Original Message----- > >Ok.. > > > >Is inter-switch performance acceptable ? (server to > server, or workstation > >to workstation) > > > >NuTs > > > >"jim mcgrath" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message > >news:6d3a01c3e74f$a00c0200$(E-Mail Removed)... > >> All our labs are connected to their own switches (each > >> one has it's own). These in turn are then uplinked to > >> the master switch which contains the servers, printers, > >> my workstation (as admin) and the backbone connection > >> (for internet). > >> > >> I reinstalled both XPSP1 on my machine and 2KSP4 on the > >> server and the loading of user manager has increased to > >> the speed it used to be. But I am still finding that > the > >> users that are logging in from the labs are still > taking > >> a long time to load their roaming profiles. What used > to > >> take 5-10 seconds now takes 4-5 minutes. > >> > >> We did analysis on the new master switch, and the > primary > >> server (NTS1) seems to be getting packets from my > >> machine, but it takes a VERY long time to respond, like > >> 20+ seconds in some cases. > >> > >> I am still in the process of doing some testing (most > >> users profiles are different sizes, and this mornings > >> user may just have a large profile (20mb) though, it > >> should not take 4-5 minutes to load it. I am finding a > >> performance increase from my machine, but that's not to > >> say it's fixed everywhere. What I don't understand is > >> that I neither installed any new drivers/software onto > >> either my machine or the server to cause something like > >> this to happen. > >> > >> j > >> > >> >-----Original Message----- > >> >Is data transfer between devices on the same switch, > but > >> transfers that need > >> >to go from the distribution switch, up to the core > >> switch, and down to the > >> >other distribution switch are sucky ? > >> > > >> >NuTs > >> > > >> >"jim mcgrath" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message > >> >news:65cd01c3e6a9$30b73380$(E-Mail Removed)... > >> >> Cisco 2950 is the new master switch. The rest (3 x > >> Cisco > >> >> 2900 and 1 x Cisco 2900XL and 1 x Cisco 2950) are > >> >> uplinked to it. > >> >> > >> >> j > >> >> >-----Original Message----- > >> >> >what kind of swtiches are you working with ? > >> >> > > >> >> >"Jim McGrath" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message > >> >> >news:648101c3e67c$1e566ee0$(E-Mail Removed)... > >> >> >> This was one of the first things that I had done, > >> along > >> >> >> with doing 2 hours of diagnostics on the new > >> switches > >> >> to > >> >> >> confirm that they were configured the same as the > >> >> >> previous "master" switch. It has no effect at > all. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> j > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >-----Original Message----- > >> >> >> >have someone make sure that the switch ports are > >> not > >> >> set > >> >> >> to auto. I have > >> >> >> >seen lots and lots of problems with managed > >> switches > >> >> >> auto negotiating with > >> >> >> >clients. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >hardcode the ports on the swtiches to 100 Full, > and > >> >> make > >> >> >> sure that the NIC > >> >> >> >on each client (server or workstation.. doesnt > >> >> matter) > >> >> >> is also configured > >> >> >> >for 100Full. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >This should help exponentially. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >NuTs > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >"jim mcgrath" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in > message > >> >> >> >news:5acb01c3e5d1$05d0a030$(E-Mail Removed)... > >> >> >> >> I recently had 2 new switches installed at my > >> site > >> >> and > >> >> >> >> started having strange problems occure. Users > >> (who > >> >> use > >> >> >> >> roaming profiles) went from 5-10 seconds to > >> login, > >> >> to > >> >> >> >> about 5 MINUTES. When I try to access User > >> Manager > >> >> >> (from > >> >> >> >> NT4 server tools), it takes upwards of 5 > minutes > >> to > >> >> >> load > >> >> >> >> the user list, where it used to take 2-3 > seconds. > >> >> I am > >> >> >> >> getting random "windows delayed write" errors > on > >> a > >> >> 2nd > >> >> >> >> server (NTS2), and network drives disappear > >> >> momentarily > >> >> >> >> and then come back. It takes forever to copy > a > >> 2mb > >> >> >> file > >> >> >> >> to the network drive on the primary server > >> (NTS1), > >> >> it > >> >> >> >> will eventually stop and give a "path is too > >> deep" > >> >> >> >> error. Yesterday I sat with our > communications > >> >> person > >> >> >> >> and tested the switch for 2 hours, which he > >> >> indicated > >> >> >> has > >> >> >> >> NO problems. I have been checking through > >> technet, > >> >> but > >> >> >> >> since I am not exactly what is happening, I am > >> >> finding > >> >> >> it > >> >> >> >> hard to find anything really relevant. Except > >> for > >> >> >> >> KB135464 (browsing errors with UDP > forwarding), > >> >> these > >> >> >> >> have increased GREATLY since the switch was > >> >> installed. > >> >> >> >> The switch installer (a different guy) said > that > >> the > >> >> >> new > >> >> >> >> ones were on VLAN2 instead of the current > VLAN1 > >> the > >> >> >> rest > >> >> >> >> were on. I have nothing to do with switch > >> >> management, > >> >> >> >> but am wondering if this may have something > to do > >> >> with > >> >> >> >> it? He indicated that the others (on VLAN1) > >> weren't > >> >> >> >> being changed. Plus the problem seems to be > >> >> >> >> intermittent. This morning it was fine, then > >> >> stopped > >> >> >> >> working, then was fine again, then stopped > >> >> working. I > >> >> >> >> have gone through the events logs on the > servers > >> and > >> >> >> >> can't see anything that's indicating a > problem, > >> >> other > >> >> >> >> than that above, where I am getting an event > ID > >> of > >> >> 8003 > >> >> >> >> repeatedly. > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> HELP! > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >. > >> >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> >. > >> >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >. > >> > > > > > > >. > > |
|
||
|
||||
|
|
|
| |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| SQL Server 2000 linked tables - slow performance since server transition | davenwhoutson@gmail.com | Microsoft Access External Data | 1 | 13th Aug 2007 11:24 PM |
| Slow 2000 Server and 2000/XP Pro Performance following Windows Updates | robert | Microsoft Windows 2000 | 2 | 12th Aug 2005 02:57 PM |
| slow network performance on windows 2000 server and xp pro desktop | =?Utf-8?B?TW9uemll?= | Microsoft Windows 2000 Networking | 12 | 5th May 2005 02:41 PM |
| 016100 - Windows 2000 USB drive driver problem | jim mcgrath | Microsoft Windows 2000 | 0 | 4th Oct 2004 06:45 PM |
| Slow performance on IIS 5.0 and Windows 2000 Server | TomyB | Microsoft Windows 2000 Networking | 2 | 24th Mar 2004 09:15 AM |
Powered by vBulletin®. Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc. |




